The Usage Of Modular-Rating Technology In The Educational Process Of Physical Culture

Abstract

The article presents the developed technology of complex rating-control for assessing the knowledge, motor skills and attainments of students engaged in aerobics in a technical university, criteria of estimation the independent work of students of a technical university on the specialization of Aerobics. The methodology of modular-rating control of students' motor activity in practical aerobics classes, rating evaluation tables is presented. The system of rating control on the specialization of Aerobics includes 4 modules, the implementation of which allows the student to score 100 points. The substantive part of each module is based on traditional methods and forms of organization of evaluation. The adapted bases of rating control to the specifics of the educational process on the discipline "Aerobics" are presented. The effectiveness of the developed evaluation criteria is given. A modular-rating control technology that allows to evaluate the quality of the student's aerobics activities, ensuring active, creative, joint activity of the teacher and student has been developed. The openness of the control system allows the student to control the level of his achievements and make informed decisions in the chosen form of motor activity independently. The rating control system allows the teacher to approach the training of each student in a different way, motivating him to achieve a specific result, thereby increasing the effectiveness of training.

Keywords: Criteria of estimationrating-control the independent work of students

Introduction

Under the conditions of modernization of tertiary education, the discipline "Physical Culture" needs a qualitative renewal, a search for new learning technologies (Lyakh, Rumba, & Gorelov, 2013; Politsinskaya, Sushko, & Semerenko 2016; Efremova, Ivanova, Plotnikova, & Chaykovskaya, 2016; Shchegolev, Lipovka, & Korshunov, 2016; Habil, 2017). The implementation in the educational process of innovative technologies creates the necessary conditions for students to have a creative approach in solving problems in their future professional activity. Innovative transformations in the specialization of Aerobics have a wide range of focus:

• updating and adjustment curriculum content;

• increasing of motivational activity of students to physical training, their adaptive well-being;

• monitoring of physical preparedness, functional and psychological state of students;

• creation of educational and methodological base, new generation benefits (Bushma, Zuikova, & Lipovka, 2017).

The effectiveness of innovations introduced in the university is assessed by results, which requires the development of appropriate forms of control and characterizes both the quality of the educational process and the student's learning activity in practical classes (Bushma, Volkova, & Zuikova, 2015; Steinberg, 2017). The introduction of the rating system organizes the educational process, strengthens the motivation of involved, provides for the possibility of a differentiated approach to teaching students, controlling their practical skills, contributing to the preservation and strengthening of the health of student youth (Mironova, Dementev, Pristav, Ustinova, & Grigorev, 2015; Nikolaenko, Grakhova, & Rakhimov, 2016; Lubysheva 2017).

According to many researchers, the rating method as a way of assessing knowledges, skills and attainments refers to the progressive methods of control. The application of the rating is a system that organizes the educational process and influences its effectiveness actively (Zagrevskaya, 2007; Starchekov, 2005).

Problem Statement

To develop a technology of complex rating-control for assessing knowledges, motor skills and attainments of students engaged in aerobics in a technical university

Research Questions

Purpose of the Study

Research Methods

Findings

The pedagogical experiment was conducted on the basis of the Institute of Physical Culture of Sport and Tourism of SPbPU on the specialization of Aerobics, 328 students of 1st and 2nd courses took part in it. The organization of the study was carried out in 3 stages.

At the first stage we developed evaluating modules and rating control scales that take into account the specifics of Aerobics, conducted a pedagogical survey, defined test tasks and criteria for their evaluation (Paulino, Sá, & Lopes, 2016; Zohreh, 2017; Yukiko, 2017).

The system of rating control on the specialization of Aerobics includes 4 modules, the accomplishment of which allows the student to score 100 points. The substantive part of each method relies on traditional methods and forms of organization of evaluation.

Module 1. Assessment of attendance during the term (table 01 ).

Conclusion

The final rating was compared with the initial results shown at the beginning of the first term. (Volkov, Volkova, & Lutchenko, 2014; Raitina, Yurmazova, Plankina, & Raitin, 2016; Sílvia, Bernardo, & Feliciano, 2017). The reliable changes and positive dynamics of the results of the final rating at the end of the second year of study on specialization should be noted. The questionnaire revealed an increase in the number of respondents, having health-improving motives and increasing their communicative activity in the field of physical culture and sports of 37%. There was a decrease in the number of students attending classes in order to obtain an exam in time of 42%. Therefore, the rationally organized process of training on the specialization of Aerobics, which includes a modular-rating technology for assessing the individual achievements of the student, contributes to the formation of a motivational and needful attitude to physical culture, improves the performance and attendance of training sessions.

• A modular-rating control technology that allows to evaluate the quality of the student's aerobics activity, ensuring active, creative, joint activity of the teacher and student has been developed.

• The openness of the control system allows the student to control the level of his achievements independently and make informed decisions in the selected form of motor activity, namely:

  • to determine the strategy of the educational vector of aerobics, taking into account the individual level of physical fitness;

  • to assess the degree of adaptive resources of the body;

  • to change the structure of motivational attitudes towards a healthy lifestyle;

  • to develop creative potential, realizing their individual abilities in performing the independent work;

  • to intensify learning activities, comparing their results with the results of fellow students

The rating control system allows the teacher to approach the training of each student in a different way, motivating them to achieve a specific result, thereby increasing the effectiveness of training.]

References

1. Bushma, T. V., Zuikova, E. G., & Lipovka, A. Yu. (2017). Technology of designing of educational programs of aerobics for students of technical University. Scientific magazine "Scientific notes of University named after P.F. Lesgaft", 3 (145), 34-40.
2. Bushma, T.V., Volkova, L.M., & Zuikova, E.G. (2015). Organization and content of the independent work of students specializing in aerobics. Theory and Practice of Physical Culture, 2, 8.
3. Efremova, O.N., Ivanova, T.O., Plotnikova, I.V., & Chaykovskaya, О.N. (2016). Innovative computer technologies as an implementer of active methods of training. RPTSS 2015, SHS Web of Conferences, 28, 01031. doi: 10.1051/shsconf/20162801031
4. Habil, A.B. (2017). The Most Preferred Methods in Higher Education. The European Proceedings of Social & Behavioural Sciences, 31, 305-319. doi:  10.15405/epsbs.2017.10.29
5. Lubysheva, L.I. (2017). Modern sports science: from stagnation to a new paradigm of development. Theory and Practice of Physical Culture, 5, 3-5. ISSN 0040-3601/ISSN 2409-4234
6. Lyakh, V.I., Rumba, O.G., & Gorelov, A.A. (2013). Criteria and methods of human motor activity (overview). Theory and Practice of Physical Culture. 10, 25.
7. Mironova, O.V., Dementev, K.N., Pristav, O.V., Ustinova, O.N., & Grigorev, V.I. (2015). Fitness resources to ensure competitive physical education of students. Theory and Practice of Physical Culture, 9, 3.
8. Nikolaenko, V.S., Grakhova, E.A., & Rakhimov, T.R. (2016, June 15). Improving the Efficiency of the Educational Process Using Interactive Teaching Methods. RPTSS 2015, SHS Web of Conferences, 28, 01073. doi: 10.1051/shsconf/20162801073
9. Obraztsov, P.I., Uman, A.I., & Fedorova, M.A. (2018). Students' Information Culture Development As Part Of Self-Learning Activities In Higher Education. The European Proceedings of Social & Behavioural Sciences, 35, 1010-1017. doi: 10.15405/ epsbs.2018.02.118
10. Paulino, P., Sá, I., & Lopes da Silva, A.S. (2016). Regulation of motivation: Contributing to students’ learning in middle school. The European Proceedings of Social & Behavioural Sciences, 8, 1-6. doi: 10.15405/epsbs.2016.05.1
11. Politsinskaya, E.V., Sushko, A.V., & Semerenko, I.A. (2016). Formation of the Professional Competence of a student within the framework of the problem-oriented approach to training. RPTSS 2015, SHS Web of Conferences, 28, 01083. doi: 10.1051/shsconf/20162801083
12. Raitina, M., Yurmazova, T., Plankina, M., & Raitin, M. (2016, June 15). The backbone of research in modern education in the context of the competence approach. RPTSS 2015, SHS Web of Conferences, 28, 01085. doi: 10.1051/shsconf/20162801085
13. Shchegolev, V. A., Lipovka, A. Yu., & Korshunov, A.V. (2016). Applied orientation of physical culture and sports with the students as a way of forming their readiness to implement the standards and requirements of the trp. Theory and Practice of Physical Culture, 6, 21-23.
14. Sílvia, A., Bernardo, V.F., Feliciano, H.V. (2017). Student Motivation And Self-Concept: Is There A Connection? The European Proceedings of Social & Behavioural Sciences, 31, 203-213. doi: 10.15405/ epsbs.2017.10.19
15. Starchekov, M.M. (2005). Rating score as a means of increasing the students' motivation for physical exercises. Theory and methods of physical education, sports training, health-promoting and adaptive physical training, 7, 33-36.
16. Steinberg, Y. (2017). “School Personality” – A Model For Systemic Evaluation And Intervention. The European Proceedings of Social & Behavioural Sciences, 31, 83-91. doi: 10.15405/epsbs.2017.10.9
17. Volkov, V.Y., Volkova, L.M., & Lutchenko, N.G. (2014). E-book on the discipline "Physical education". Theory and Practice of Physical Culture. 7, 33-36.
18. Wójcik, M. (2017). The Latest Information And Communication Technologies In LIS Education. The European Proceedings of Social & Behavioural Sciences, 31, 43-47. doi: 10.15405/epsbs.2017.10.5
19. Yukiko, Inoue-Smith (2017). Evaluating The Plus/Minus Grading System For Undergraduate Courses. The European Proceedings of Social & Behavioural Sciences. 32, 58-67. doi: 15405/epsbs.2017.11.6
20. Zagrevskaya, A.I. (2007). Rating system for assessing the quality of education in physical culture. Theory and Practice of Physical Culture, 3, 9-13.
21. Zohreh, M. (2017). Effectiveness Of Second Person And Self-Monitoring Approaches In Academic Achievement. The European Proceedings of Social & Behavioural Sciences, 31, 1-7. doi: 10.15405/epsbs.2017.10.1