Digital Product Pricing Algorithm Development

Abstract

This study discusses the problem of pricing digital products related to the specifics of their creation, promotion and implementation. Most often high-tech companies, working with development and maintaining of digital products, use the methods, that have no way to objectively assess the price of such products as software, music, e-books, web-design elements etc. Also, there is a lack of research on the development of flexible methodology digital products pricing. Therefore, the main objective of this article is to create a more optimal and flexible method of pricing for digital products. The paper considers features of the digital products implementation and internal and external factors influencing pricing digital products. The authors analyse and compare the classical pricing approaches such as cost approach, profitable (parametric) and comparative approach. Based on this analysis authors highlight advantages and disadvantages for applying these approaches to digital products. Taking into account the features of the digital products implementation, an algorithm for their pricing is proposed. Due to considered internal and external factors for the IT-product price evaluating six stages of digital products pricing are developed. The algorithm proposed by the authors can be used to develop a digital product pricing tool for companies or projects in the early stages of development.

Keywords: Pricingdigital productpricing algorithmcostsvalue formationpricing policy

Introduction

In the context of transition to digital economy the share of gross domestic product (GDP) that is formed on the basis of digital products is increasing. The authors of the road map for ensuring sustainable economic growth of non-resource-based sector of Russian economy affirm that the share of digital sector in GDP will increase up to 5% by 2025. At the same time, the new technologies penetrate into all the spheres of economic life, accelerating the digital transformation of business, which, in its turn, shifts the points of value creation.

The problems of pricing for digital products, at any rate, are related to the difficulty of defining the factors, affecting the choice of the most real product price.

«Digital products» (hereinafter referred to as DP) are goods, works and services that are directly involving information handling and are realized using information systems and/or programs — everything that is created, developed and consumed in a digital environment.

From the point of view of theoretical economics digital products are public or collective goods which are provided privately (Demsetz, 1970). The ways to supply these goods determine their particular features and immediacy of the problem of their pricing. In other words, it is not the manufacturing costs, but rather the transaction costs that prevail in the structure of the prime cost of DP, which means the channels of product delivery to the consumer.

In the article (Kozyrev, 2020), digital products are divided into three groups based on the characteristics of their production and consumption: 1) products in a digital form that do not have a material prototype (for example, software, electronic books, films) or material copies. This products have the same value, which is different for different consumers (for example when one buys a cinema ticket or watches a film on a pirate web site); 2) digital copies of conventional products that retain the functional qualities of their prototypes (for example, copies of films that were originally shot materially, digitized books or works of art). These products are often of lower value than the original; 3) digital representations of conventional products that allow more efficient control of the consumption of the prototype product (for example, Uber, Airbnb, Booking). Each car (in the case of Uber) or apartments (in the case of Airbnb) corresponds to its digital image, which allows to optimize the process of using the service.

It should be noted that all three groups of digital products are characterized by the costs representing the losses from such negative phenomena as piracy, copyright and related rights protection, investment return into protected content and spreading of undesirable information, as well as additional tax assessment, installation of additional equipment for collecting information on the Internet users, etc. (Hui & Chau, 2002; Kozyrev, 2020).

The main problem of the majority of high tech companies (company group Speech Technology Center, AO Fiber-optic systems, etc.), working with development and maintaining of digital products, currently is the absence of a flexible methodology of a digital product pricing. Most often these companies use the methods, that have no way to objectively assess the price of such products as software, music, e-books, developments, web-design elements, as well as different design and architecture projects etc. The company management often makes a decision based on how much the customers are ready to pay, which does not seem to be a completely valid method. Therefore, the main objective of this article is to create a more optimal and flexible methodology of pricing for digital products.

Methods

At present there is a vast variety of pricing methods (Kryuchkova & Popov, 2002). Three main approaches to pricing of products are: cost-based, income-based (value-based, parametric) and comparative (market-based).

The cost-based approach, or pricing based on prime cost (derived from the English cost-based pricing), involves the addition of an extra charge to production costs on the product (Banker & Hansen, 2002; Shin et al., 2012). This approach is very common and is used both in wholesale and retail sales, however, when creating and launching an innovative product on the market, this approach is not always optimal due to the specific character of the product.

There are three main methods within the framework of the cost-based approach: the cost plus method, the break-even method and the direct cost method. The first method means calculating the cost of a product by adding a certain amount of profit to the current unit costs. The calculation can be made according to the formula (1):

Price = C ( 1 + R / 100 ) , (1)

where Price – selling price; C – total costs per production unit; R – expected (normative) rate of return.

However, the fact that the product demand and competition on the market are not taken into account is a shortcoming of this method.

The method, based on the break-even analysis, estimates the level of sales necessary for an organization to receive target profit. The basis of the second method is the calculation according to formula (2).

Profit = Price × S - ( F C + V C × S ) (2)

where Profit – profit for period; Price – price of product / service; S – sales volume; FC – fixed costs; VC – variable costs.

The direct cost method determines the price as the sum of variable costs and anticipated profit.

According to the income-based approach, pricing is based on the utility of the product and purchasing power. In a particular case, according to this approach, production costs can be reflected through the rate of profitability and financial result (Gurina et al., 2018). The income-based approach includes a group of parametric pricing methods, namely: the method of relative indicators, assembly method and score method.

The method of relative indicators allows determining the price of similar products based on one common parameter, the change of which determines the price of the product. But this method is not suitable for products that have several characteristics determining the price; moreover it does not take into account market and consumer aspects or overlooks the demand for goods.

The assembly method is used for products consisting of separate products or standard components. When this method is used, the price includes the sum of the prices of the separate structural parts of the products with the addition of the cost of new parts and standard profit.

The score method uses expert appraisal in the form of scores for certain significant parameters of the basic and new products. Adding together these scores allows making an assessment of the technical and economic and market level of the product. The advantage of this method is the ability to give a qualitative assessment of parameters that cannot be quantified (taste, fashion, etc.).

However, a group of parametric methods is used for products that complement or expand the product line. In addition, this method does not take into account the demand for the product.

The essence of the income-based approach consists in managing the demand of consumers of products and services based on the formation and transformation of needs. A modern fact of the Russian DP market is the submission of manufacturers to the sphere of circulation, what we can see, analyzing the structure of Russian GDP, based on production volumes (2014, 2017 and 2018), which in its turn is determined by the level of quality of technology development that can produce absolutely any product based on knowledge of needs (Burykin, 2017; Bulletin of current trends in the Russian economy…, 2019). The income-based approach can be defined as a base for forming the value of needs of direct buyers and their ability to purchase specific products (for example asset assessment of AO RVC (Russian venture company) or AO Rosnano etc.)

A comparative approach sets in motion a group of market methods of product pricing, when pricing is based on an analysis of various factors, taking into account the elasticity of demand and the value perception of products by the buyer. The group of market methods includes: the method of perceived value, the method of price barriers, the method of pricing based on competitors.

The method of perceived value consists in studying the consumer's perception of the price of a product through, for example, a focus group and establishing an acceptable level of price. The method of price barriers establishes the price of a product according to the identified price clusters, which the consumer creates based on the quality of the product and the product image component, for example, “cheap”, “common”, “expensive” and “elite”. The method of pricing based on competitors uses the analysis and comparison of the power of differentiation of the organization’s products with competitors. This takes into account the competitive situation in a one particular market and the competitive position of the company itself.

The comparative approach takes into account factors that adversely affect product pricing. For example, the market value of an analogue product (cost from competitors) or the extra charge of the project initiators are taken into account, but the purchasing power of the consumer is not considered. Thus, this method can exclude the desired part of the target audience.

At present, the final evaluation of price of the enterprise`s digital products is performed using the main approaches given above (Hinterhuber & Liozu, 2012; Krishnan et al., 1999; Nylén & Holmström, 2015). Main advantages and disadvantages of each of the approaches are given in the table I (Baimova & Yolkina, 2018).

Table 1 -
See Full Size >

Thus, it can be noted that when introducing a new digital product to the market, it is necessary to consider specific factors related to the characteristics of the external and internal environments of the organization, and also to develop pricing policies and strategy in advance.

The pricing process in the digital products and services market, without doubt, has some particular features that are only characteristic to this kind of market. As a whole the method for determining an optimal price for information product as an object of purchase and sale from the point of view of the manufacturing enterprise can be presented in a form of several successive stages (see Table II).

Table 2 -
See Full Size >

At the initial stage it is necessary to find out the pricing factors, which influence the price of information product that the company wants to bring to the market. They can be divided into several groups: environment, demand, consumer choice, offers an alternative manufacturing capabilities (Pfouts, 1961; Piryazev, 2005). The table III describes the prime cost factors that influence the DP price.

Table 3 -
See Full Size >

Factors of environment reflect the impact of external conditions on doing business. Factors of demand determine the price for the product that the buyer suggests. Describing the third factor, it is worth noting its significant role in determining the competitiveness of a product in the market of analogue products. Factors of offer primarily determine the cost of the product that the seller wants to have. Alternative manufacturing capabilities characterize the quantity of another product, the manufacturing of which had to be stopped, in order to manufacture an additional unit of product.

However, in practice, organizations most often focus on several key factors when they form pricing policies: costs, profits, competitors, public opinion and product value. Whereas it is necessary to take into account both external and internal factors for assessing the value, the classification of which is shown in table IV (Yakovleva & Kolyshkin, 2019).

Table 4 -
See Full Size >

Socio-demographic and technological trends in the digitalization of the economy and the business community, which have a greater impact on the creation of conditions for the digital transformation of enterprises, determine the common system of internal and external factors. In their turn, these factors influence the process of transition from one principle of doing business and evaluating the company products to a new mechanism, which is the most transparent and has the highest quality.

Results

Gribanov (2019) identified the factors of the environment that limit the ability to conduct a quality evaluation of the cost of DP: state regulation, technologies and competition; resources, human factor, psychological and organizational barriers.

According to this classification we can identify: a) a state barrier including economical uncertainty and volatility of ruble, as well as normative limitations and absence of a list of standards for digital products usage and pricing; b) technological obstacles, such as lack of solutions in the field of pricing of digital products, that would take into account technological effectiveness, innovativeness of the digital products, as well as a low level of security of digital technologies (Dutta et al., 2003); c) resource barriers (monetary funds, materials, people and knowledge) that affect an artificial overpricing of a product, which has a negative effect on its sales; d) human factor that includes a lack of qualification of the employees, who form the value of a digital product. Thus, for the most clear and correct pricing for a digital product, an algorithm for calculating the price should be formed taking into account the expanded set of prime cost factors and factors of environment.

As the first stage we propose an evaluation of all the costs that make part of the process of a digital product creation, taking into account several limitations which are inherent to every separate case. The examples of calculation of costs for digital solutions can be found in the works (Bariev, 2011; Grunichev, 2009; Tokaeva & Alborova, 2018). As a result of the first stage we will determine the minimum price of a digital product (MP). At the second stage we will find a minimal acceptable price (MPD), which is formed based on the value of the minimum product price (MP) and the distributed minimum income from low-risk investments (D). At the third stage we make a forecasting of the expected demand for the product, taking into account the potential decline in demand due to the possible emergence of substitute products and the non-linear growth in the number of customers. To do this we must consider two factors as a basis: a stage of the product life cycle and the level of competition. These factors are quite provisional, because they largely depend on the product marketing and must be determined separately for each case (Huang & Sundararajan, 2011; Mysen & Chen, 2012). At the fourth stage we determine the level of a minimum acceptable income of company from the digital product realization (MPC), that will satisfy the requirements of the company to development and realization profitability, based on the company price policy. At this stage it is evident that MPC > MPD, according to the definitions of the variables given above. At the fifth stage we establish the final product price (PRC) by finding out the maximum product price, which the consumer will be ready to pay for the digital product taking into account the incomes of consumers (CP). PRC is defined as the average between MPD and CP. In case if MPD is higher than PRC it is necessary to calculate a possible costs reduction. At the sixth stage we perform analysis of competitors and calculate an average price throughout the market among the direct competitors (PC). At the same time PRC should be commensurate with PC, because if PC < PRC, there will be a difficulty to sell the product due to an unfavourable position on the market, whereas in case of an opposite situation (PC > PRC) there will be short-received profits, which is a contradiction for the company.

Consequently, the formula for calculating the price of a digital product will comprise several variables, such as the minimum price, the minimum acceptable price, the minimum acceptable income from realization, the highest possible price, as well as the average price throughout the market and the coefficient of decline in demand for a particular product. The relationship between the variables may vary due to different pricing policies of companies and due to the market conditions (Goldberg et al., 2006; Tan & Carrillo, 2017).

Discussion

When performing pricing for a digital product both the internal and external factors of the environment should be considered. The algorithm of digital product pricing received as a result of our research can be used for the initial selection of the price of the product of companies operating in the IT market and, in case of absence of a rigid mechanism of state regulation of prices, it can be also used for products of a similar type. After determining the initial price, the price can vary during the product life cycle to achieve market equilibrium and the best sales figures.

The results of this paper will become a foundation for development of a digital product pricing method, which, when it is automated, will provide an instrument for managing the development of small and medium-sized businesses in the field of ICT.

References

  1. Baimova, L. A., & Yolkina, L. G. (2018). Pricing for an innovative product. Science Alley, 8(5), 569-573.
  2. Banker, R. D., & Hansen, S. C. (2002). The adequacy of full-cost-based pricing heuristics. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 14(1), 33-58.
  3. Bariev, B. F. (2011). Principles of building cost accounting and pricing in an IT outsourcing company. Actual problems of economics and law, 4(20).
  4. Bulletin of current trends in the Russian economy. Dynamics and structure of Russia's GDP. Analytical Center under the Government of the Russian Federation. (2019). https://ac.gov.ru/files/publication/a/21974.pdf
  5. Burykin, A. D. (2017). Value approach in pricing. Modern trends in the development of science and technology, 3(13), 23-25.
  6. Curlo, E. (1999). Marketing strategy, product safety, and ethical factors in consumer choice. Journal of Business Ethics, 21(1), 37-48.
  7. Demsetz, H. (1970). The Private Production of Public Goods. Journal of Law and Economics, 13, 293-306.
  8. Dutta, S., Zbaracki, M. J., & Bergen, M. (2003). Pricing process as a capability: A resource‐based perspective. Strategic management journal, 24(7), 615-630.
  9. Goldberg, A. V., Hartline, J. D., & Wright, A. K. (2006). U.S. Patent No. 6,985,885. Patent and Trademark Office.
  10. Gribanov, Yu. I. (2019). Factors and conditions for the digital transformation of socio-economic systems. Bulletin of the Altai Academy of Economics and Law, 2(2), 253-259.
  11. Grunichev, Yu. A. (2009). Evaluation of the cost-effectiveness of outsourcing IT services. Century of quality, 5, 54-56.
  12. Gurina, E. V., Sologub, A. A., & Ruban, A. A. (2018, November 14-16). Modern approaches to pricing. Instrument-making-2018: materials of the 11th International Scientific and Technical Conference, Minsk, Republic of Belarus. In O.K. Gusev (chairman), et al. (Eds.), (pp. 463-465). BNTU.
  13. Hinterhuber, A., & Liozu, S. (2012). Is it time to rethink your pricing strategy? MIT Sloan management review, 53(4), 69.
  14. Huang, K. W., & Sundararajan, A. (2011). Pricing digital goods: Discontinuous costs and shared infrastructure. Information Systems Research, 22(4), 721-738.
  15. Hui, K. L., & Chau, P. Y. K. (2002). Classifying digital products. Communications of the ACM, 45(6), 73-79.
  16. Kozyrev, A. N. (2020). Digital products and digital transformation of business. CEMI-RAS Central Economics and Mathematics Institute of CEMI. https://medium.com/cemi-ras/digital-products-digital-transformation-business-b67c585e4875 (accessed: 10.02.2020).
  17. Krishnan, T. V., Bass, F. M., & Jain, D. C. (1999). Optimal pricing strategy for new products. Management Science, 45(12), 1650-1663.
  18. Kryuchkova, O. N., & Popov, E. V. (2002). Classification of pricing methods. Marketing in Russia and abroad, 4, 32-53.
  19. Mysen, C. C., & Chen, J. (2012). U.S. Patent No. 8,332,260. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
  20. Nylén, D., & Holmström, J. (2015). Digital innovation strategy: A framework for diagnosing and improving digital product and service innovation. Business Horizons, 58(1), 57-67.
  21. Pfouts, R. W. (1961). The theory of cost and production in the multi-product. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 650-658.
  22. Piryazev, M. S. (2005). Features of pricing in the market of information products and services. Journal of Economic Theory, 1, 127-132.
  23. Shin, J., Sudhir, K., & Yoon, D. H. (2012). When to “fire” customers: Customer cost-based pricing. Management Science, 58(5), 932-947.
  24. Tan, Y., & Carrillo, J. E. (2017). Strategic analysis of the agency model for digital goods. Production and Operations Management, 26(4), 724-741.
  25. Tokaeva, S. K., & Alborova, A. V. (2018). Cost and taxation in the digital economy. Scientific News, 12, 81-83.
  26. Yakovleva, T. V., & Kolyshkin, A. V. (2019). Problems of digital transformation in Russian enterprises. Editorial board, 113-117.

Copyright information

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

About this article

Cite this paper as:

Click here to view the available options for cite this article.

Publisher

European Publisher

First Online

08.03.2021

Doi

10.15405/epsbs.2021.03.65

Online ISSN

2357-1330