The paper justifies the relevance of a key competence of an educational psychologist. The authors conducted philosophical and psychological-pedagogical analysis of the problem of interaction and concluded that the ability to interact is a fundamental factor within all areas of professional activity of an educational psychologist. The optimal psychological and pedagogical conditions at a higher educational institution ensuring the development of this important attribute of future experts require careful analysis of the term “interaction”, definition of modern requirements to educational psychologists within their professional activity and structuring of the studied ability. Theoretical and methodological study conducted by the authors allowed identifying the main and key structural components of the considered ability of an educational psychologist: cognitive-informational, empathic-communicative, andragogical-subjective, standard-behavioral components. Such system and structural approach facilitates the understanding of complex qualities, thus defining place and functionality of each component. The paper characterizes the identified components and criteria of their diagnostics, which are considered essential to select the best diagnostic methods and techniques in order to identify the maturity level regarding the ability of future educational psychologists to interact with specialists of educational institutions. The results of the study allowed defining the maturity level of each component of this complex integrated professional quality of an educational psychologist separately and the studied ability in general. The obtained data may be considered in the creation of special psychological and pedagogical conditions of the educational process and extracurricular activities of students studying within the program
Keywords: Educational psychologistabilityinteractioncognitive-informational
The relevance of the problem related to the development of the ability of a future educational psychologist to interact with experts of the educational process fulfilling educational objectives and problems, ensuring education and development of students is caused by the importance of the given quality within the professional activity of a psychologist. The Federal State Educational Standard (FSES) concerning the program
The ability to interact is one of the key professional abilities of an educational psychologist. Its maturity level determines the efficiency of awareness-building work, counseling, psychotherapy and psychocorrection. Complex interaction of an educational psychologist with all agents of teaching and educational process implies the ability of the former one to build relationship, to establish the necessary contacts, including professional communication with colleagues based on the principles of andragogy – mutual respect, cooperation, credibility. Besides, it is important to demonstrate sincere interest in people, benevolence, humanity, kindness (Minazova, 2016a).
The need of philosophical and psychological-pedagogical analysis of the interaction of educational psychologists with specialists of educational institutions, as well as with children and their parents is beyond any doubt since interaction is considered the “deepest source, the basis and the reason for formation and development of the interacting objects” (Gritsanov, 1998, p. 18). Ozhegov gives the following definition to “interaction”: “a) interrelation of phenomena and b) mutual support, coordinated actions” (as cited in Ozhegov & Shvedova, 1999, p. 98). The second part of Ozhegov’s definition – mutual support and coordinated actions – contains a deep meaning of the entire professional activity of an educational psychologist. The sociological encyclopedia defines the term “interaction” even closer to the understanding of content of the chosen competence – “the process of direct contacts, communication of group members among themselves; systematic influence of group members on each other; development of general values and standards of behavior …” (Semigin, 2003, p.74).
Psychology and pedagogics considers interaction alongside with relations and communication. Social psychology identifies the interactive aspect of communication (communication as interaction) focused on the general behavioral strategy in actions (Andreyeva, 2017). The Psychology Dictionary by Petrovsky and Yaroshevsky (1990) defines interaction as “the process of direct or mediated influence of objects (subjects) on each other thus fostering their mutual conditionality and communication” (p. 68). Bogomolova (2008) notes that “the individual influence is a process and result of change by one person of behavior of the other – his patterns, outlook, certain values, ideas, opinions, evaluations ...” (p. 55).
Pedagogical interaction is a key concept of pedagogics. Bim-Bud (2002) defines this term as follows: “interaction in pedagogical activity is the process between a teacher and a student during educational activity aimed at personal development” (p. 49). Pedagogical interaction implies numerous interrelations between subjects and objects of the educational process. In this particular case, it implies communication between educational psychologists and specialists of educational institutions engaged in training, education and development of students.
Thus, the development of the ability for effective interaction with specialists of educational institutions is a relevant problem in psychological practice and pedagogical science caused by modern requirements to professional activity of educational psychologists, specifics of the profession and FSES requirements to graduates in psychology and pedagogics. To define the most effective psychological and pedagogical conditions at any higher educational institution thus optimizing the ability of students to interact with specialists of educational institutions there is a need to analyze the development of certain competences or structural components of this ability among future educational psychologists.
The ability to interact, to influence, and hence to change the other person and yourself is a complex integrated attribute of a future educational psychologist, which understanding requires thorough structuring, division of this quality into separate components with further systematization, i.e. future coordination of certain elements to achieve a more effective result. The analysis of the term “interaction”, modern requirements to educational psychologists within professional activity (Minazova, 2016a), as well as structural and functional approach (Coser, 1956; Romanenko, 2008) made it possible to conclude that the main and essential structural components of the studied ability of educational psychologists are as follows: cognitive-informational, empathic-communicative, andragogical-subjective, standard-behavioral components.
To understand what qualities reflect the identified components and what shall be formed and instilled in future educational psychologists, let us briefly address the characteristic of each component (Minazova, 2016b).
The cognitive-informational component reflects the ability of an educational psychologist for professional information search; vigorous cognitive activity to acquire professional knowledge; possession of various techniques and technologies of effective teamwork.
The empathic-communicative component reflects the ability and readiness of an educational psychologist to sympathize, empathize and understand the emotional condition of a client. The empathy of interpersonal communication allows an educational psychologist understanding the inner world of a client having taken on the role of another person, to find a way out of a difficult situation from his personal perspective. This valuable feature fosters mutual trust thus making the communication process pleasant. As a rule, empathy makes human interactions flexible. In the psychology of education, empathy is defined as “the ability to communicate so that the audience gets the feeling of being understood” (Mikheeva, Gorodilova, Brykina, Fabrikov, & Usmanova, 2018, p. 669).
The andragogical-subjective component emphasizes the need to consider andragogical principles within the interaction of an educational psychologist with other experts of the educational process: equality of relations; minimization of authority; sight of respect, understanding and interest in colleagues; principle of professional teamwork; support of equality of parties at all stages of activities of an educational psychologist.
The standard-behavioral component implies professional behavior and activity of an educational psychologist based on the regulatory framework governing the activity and behavior of an educational psychologist within the education system.
Purpose of the Study
The purpose of the study is to select the battery of diagnostic methods and techniques for further identification of the maturity level regarding the ability of future educational psychologists to interact with specialists of educational institutions and to carry out diagnostics of the considered ability among students.
The diagnostic study was based on the following methods: observations; polling and conversation with students on their understanding of such important professional quality as the ability to interact with teachers of educational institutions concerning students’ development; content analysis; methods of mathematical statistics. The study was conducted in 2018 at the Department of Philology of Chechen State University. Full-time and part-time students of the 2nd and 3rd years of study within the program
Let us describe the results obtained through the test of the maturity level of each component of the studied ability of future educational psychologists.
The analysis of obtained data on the development of the
Then, we tried to identify the maturity levels of the
The study of the
In order to diagnose the maturity level of the
According to the results of the survey, the students were split into three groups, each corresponding to a certain maturity level of the given personal quality. The students that put “yes” against the first group of factors (establishing equal and polite contact) demonstrated the
The diagnostics of the
The test contained over 25 questions and more than 70 approximate answers. The analysis of students’ answers made it possible to conclude that students are not really aware of the main documents and legal terms regulating their future professional activity; it is not clear for them what does the Regulatory Framework regulating their activity is based on; they do not attach importance to the knowledge of the Regulatory Framework, etc. The future educational psychologists demonstrated especially weak knowledge regarding their interaction with specialists of educational institutions. Hence, only 4% of students demonstrated the high level of standard-behavioral component; 20% – medium level; 76% – low level. The obtained results illustrate the need to increase the knowledge of regulatory framework as well as legal and ethical behavior of students – future educational psychologists.
Using the data on each component, we calculated the indicators of maturity level of the ability of future educational psychologists to interact with specialists of educational institutions:
high level – 8.5% of the total number of students;
medium level – 33% of the total number of students;
low level – 58.5% of the total number of students.
Thus, the task to reveal the maturity level of future educational psychologists regarding the ability to interact with specialists of educational institutions made it possible to identify a series of diagnostic methods and techniques. They include the following: development of questions for future educational psychologists (How do you understand the ability of an educational psychologist to interact with specialists of educational institutions? and What qualities shall an educational psychologist have for efficient interaction with specialists of educational institutions in order to transfer the psychological knowledge?).
The obtained data demonstrating relatively low level of future educational psychologists regarding their ability to interact with specialists of educational institutions are focused on and aimed at the need to create special psychological and pedagogical conditions of the educational process and extracurricular activities of students. In our opinion, it is critical to introduce additional elective courses, and take some practical measures that would change the initial indicators of the above ability in the long-term perspective thus becoming a subject of our further research.
- Andreyeva, G. M. (2017). Social psychology. Moscow: Aspect Press.
- Bim-Bud, B. M. (2002). Pedagogical encyclopedic dictionary. Moscow: Great Russian encyclopedia.
- Bogomolova, N. N. (2008). Social psychology of mass communication. Moscow: Aspect Press.
- Coser, L. A. (1956). Functions of Social Conflict. Hostility and Tensions in Conflict Relationships. Retrieved from: https books.google.ru
- Gritsanov, A. A. (1998). Latest philosophical dictionary. Minsk: V.M. Skakun.
- MES RF (2015). Federal state educational standard of higher education. Higher education. Bachelor degree. Major 44.03.02 Psychology and Pedagogics (approved by the decree No. 1457 of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation of 14 December 2015). Moscow: Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation.
- Mikheeva, L. N., Gorodilova, S. A., Brykina, E. K., Fabrikov, M. S., & Usmanova, L. T. (2018). Features of emotional intelligence of university students prone to manipulative behavior. Astra Salvensis, 6, 664–678.
- Minazova, V. M. (2016a). Requirements to professional training of future educational psychologists in interaction with teachers of correctional educational institution. Problems of modern pedagogical education, 52(7), 283–289.
- Minazova, V. M. (2016b). Structure of a psychologist’s ability to interact effectively with social teachers of correctional educational institutions regarding educational matters. The world of education – education in the world, 3(63), 256–262.
- Ozhegov, S. I., & Shvedova, N. Yu. (1999). Explanatory dictionary of the Russian language. Moscow: Azbukovnik.
- Petrovsky, A. V., & Yaroshevsky, M. G. (1990). Psychology. Dictionary. Moscow: Politizdat.
- Raygorodsky, D. Ya. (2001). Practical psychodiagnostics. Techniques and tests. Samara: Bakhrakh-M.
- Romanenko, N. M. (2008). System and structural approach to intellectual development of students. Modern study of humanities, 2, 217–219.
- Semigin, G. Yu. (2003). Sociological encyclopedia. Moscow: Mysl.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
About this article
21 January 2020
Print ISBN (optional)
Sociolinguistics, linguistics, semantics, discourse analysis, science, technology, society
Cite this article as:
Minazova*, V., Lechiyeva, M., Muskhanova, I., Bashayeva, S., & Magomedova, Z. (2020). Diagnostics Of Ability Of Future Educational Psychologists To Interact With Specialists. In D. Karim-Sultanovich Bataev, S. Aidievich Gapurov, A. Dogievich Osmaev, V. Khumaidovich Akaev, L. Musaevna Idigova, M. Rukmanovich Ovhadov, A. Ruslanovich Salgiriev, & M. Muslamovna Betilmerzaeva (Eds.), Social and Cultural Transformations in the Context of Modern Globalism, vol 76. European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences (pp. 2269-2275). Future Academy. https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2019.12.04.302