Tax Officers’ Scepticism and Professional Judgment: The Mediation of Client Fraud Indicators Intensity
Table 1: Results of Bootstrapping for Assessment of Path Coefficients
Hypothesis | Path | Std. beta, β | Mean | Std Dev | t-value | p-value | Confidence Intervals | |
2.5% | 97.5% | |||||||
H1 | Scepticism -> Tax professional judgment | 0.146 | 0.148 | 0.059 | 2.464 | 0.007 | 0.055 | 0.243 |
H2 | Scepticism -> Client’s fraud indicators intensity | 0.705 | 0.707 | 0.028 | 25.04 | 0.000 | 0.658 | 0.749 |
H3 | Client’s fraud indicators intensity ->Tax professional judgment | 0.224 | 0.222 | 0.058 | 3.858 | 0.000 | 0.128 | 0.315 |
H4 | Scepticism ->Client’s fraud indicators intensity ->Tax professional judgment | 0.158 | 0.161 | 0.043 | 3.634 | 0.000 | 0.082 | 0.252 |