European Proceedings Logo

Method Of Assessing The Location Attractiveness Of The Warehouse Market

Table 3: Ranking of location attractiveness based on the indicator

No. Location Value of the indicator Level of location attractiveness Limit values (SI)
1 Silesian conurbation 0,658 Highest (A) x - + 1 * σ > 0,498 4
2 Lodz agglomeration 0,554
3 Warsaw region 0,536
4 Krakow agglomeration 0,498 High (B) x - + 0,5 * σ > 0,4569
5 Częstochowa 0,486
6 Warsaw (city) 0,481
7 Wrocław agglomeration 0,478
8 Radom 0,477
9 Poznań agglomeration 0,463
10 Legnica 0,456 Mediocre (C) x - + 0,5 * σ < 0,4569
11 Kutno 0,454
12 Kielce 0,405
13 Tarnów 0,401
14 Włocławek 0,398
15 Kalisz 0,392
16 Zielona Góra 0,392 x - - 0,5 * σ > 0,3737
17 Opole 0,388
18 Rzeszów 0,381
19 Gorzów Wlkp. 0,380
20 Bydgoszcz-Toruń 0,377
21 Elbląg 0,375 Low (D) x - - 0,5 * σ < 0,3737
22 Konin 0,372
23 Lublin 0,357
24 Tri-City 0,347
25 Świebodzin-Słubice 0,340
26 Olsztyn 0,313 Lowest (E) x - - 1 * σ < 0,3323
27 Szczecin agglomeration 0,312
28 Białystok 0,291
29 Piła 0,280
< Back to article