Resilience Of Social Networking Groups: Analysis Of Content Using Grounded Theory Method
Table 1: Relative frequency of discursive features of various components of resilience, identified in social networking groups
Social networking group name | Detection and compensation ofundesirable tendencies | Change monitoring | Antifragility | Positive attitude and satisfaction | Overcoming through self-development | Activity as a way to overcome difficulties | General resilience | External evaluation indicators |
Bittsa | 0.34 | 0.37 | 0.27 | 0.35 | 0.27 | 0.48 | 0.36 | 1 |
Ales | 0.42 | 0.23 | 0.45 | 0.43 | 0.28 | 0.21 | 0.33 | 1 |
Together | 0.11 | 0.55 | 0.16 | 0.31 | 0.21 | 0.19 | 0.25 | 1 |
Рaleo Рlanet | 0.13 | 0.20 | 0.29 | 0.45 | 0.08 | 0.47 | 0.27 | 1 |
Bubble | 0.24 | 0.31 | 0.93 | 0.62 | 0.39 | 0.36 | 0.47 | 2 |
Antarctica | 0.34 | 0.46 | 0.29 | 0.40 | 0.12 | 0.54 | 0.36 | 2 |
Dog and Cat | 0.41 | 0.21 | 0.29 | 0.84 | 0.56 | 0.46 | 0.47 | 2 |
BJDClub | 0.35 | 0.36 | 0.41 | 0.45 | 0.04 | 0.22 | 0.31 | 2 |
Varlamov | 0.46 | 0.72 | 0.57 | 0.43 | 0.35 | 0.40 | 0.50 | 3 |
League of Lawyers | 0.54 | 1.13 | 0.83 | 0.73 | 0.85 | 0.31 | 0.74 | 3 |
Detroit | 0.41 | 0.64 | 0.63 | 0.81 | 0.14 | 0.56 | 0.53 | 3 |
LizaAlert | 0.72 | 0.71 | 1.13 | 0.81 | 0.86 | 0.22 | 0.75 | 3 |