| №№ |
Criteria for evaluation |
Points |
| Content of the task |
| 1 |
The arguments (counterarguments) are directly related to the topic |
10 |
| 2 |
Some of the arguments (counterarguments) are directly related to the topic |
5 |
| 3 |
Strong arguments (counterarguments) (accurately established and interrelated facts, eyewitness accounts, statements by authoritative personalities, statistical information) |
10 |
| 4 |
Weak arguments (counterarguments) (analogies and non-demonstrative examples, personal arguments, incomplete statistics) |
5 |
| 5 |
Logical sequence is observed when presenting arguments (counterarguments) |
10 |
| 6 |
Logical sequence is broken when presenting arguments (counterarguments) |
5 |
| Team work |
| 1 |
The team demonstrates teamwork in full (collective decision, partnerships, delegation of authority, acceptance of constructive criticism) |
10 |
| 2 |
The group partially demonstrates teamwork (serious disagreements are possible, internal team struggle for authority, insufficiently clear distribution of responsibilities) |
5 |
