| Region |
Overall indicator |
Group indicator of competitive potential by attribute |
| «Economic growth» |
«Innovative development» |
«Quality of life» |
«Human development» |
| Group 1. Regions with a high level of competitive potential(10 regions with the highest level) |
| Moscow city |
243 |
73 |
75 |
46 |
49 |
| Saint-Petersburg city |
164 |
47 |
25 |
51 |
41 |
| Tyumen region |
159 |
49 |
23 |
41 |
46 |
| Moscow region |
158 |
46 |
25 |
46 |
41 |
| Sverdlovsk region |
140 |
36 |
9 |
50 |
45 |
| Republic of Bashkortostan |
129 |
34 |
4 |
50 |
41 |
| Republic of Tatarstan |
125 |
37 |
9 |
39 |
40 |
| Voronezh region |
124 |
34 |
24 |
33 |
33 |
| Nizhny Novgorod region |
123 |
35 |
19 |
33 |
36 |
| Krasnodar region |
122 |
37 |
10 |
36 |
39 |
| Group 2. Regions with a median level of competitive potential(10 regions with the median level) |
| Kaluga region |
98 |
35 |
4 |
30 |
29 |
| Altai region |
97 |
33 |
4 |
29 |
31 |
| Tambov region |
97 |
27 |
9 |
31 |
30 |
| Chukotka Autonomous district |
97 |
41 |
3 |
23 |
30 |
| Arkhangelsk region |
96 |
29 |
4 |
28 |
35 |
| Novgorod region |
96 |
32 |
7 |
25 |
32 |
| Orenburg region |
96 |
30 |
4 |
29 |
33 |
| Tver region |
96 |
32 |
5 |
29 |
30 |
| Kirov region |
95 |
31 |
4 |
27 |
33 |
| Kostroma region |
95 |
32 |
9 |
26 |
28 |
| Group 3. Regions with a low level of competitive potential(10 regions with the lowest level) |
| Republic of Crimea |
84 |
31 |
4 |
22 |
27 |
| Chechen Republic |
84 |
23 |
3 |
20 |
38 |
| Amur region |
83 |
31 |
4 |
22 |
26 |
| Kabardino-Balkarian Republic |
81 |
23 |
4 |
18 |
36 |
| Republic of Adygeya |
81 |
34 |
4 |
20 |
23 |
| Tuva Republic |
80 |
25 |
5 |
20 |
30 |
| Republic of Kalmykia |
79 |
26 |
4 |
19 |
30 |
| Jewish Autonomous region |
76 |
29 |
4 |
15 |
28 |
| The Republic of Ingushetia |
75 |
17 |
4 |
17 |
37 |
| Karachayevo-Circassian Republic |
74 |
27 |
4 |
14 |
29 |