Criteria |
PHH |
PF |
Status of the herder in the household (organization) |
Individual |
HeadofthePF, memberofthePF, withoutformal work agreement, personal labor participation |
Legislation regarding the herder in the OLF |
Exists outside the legal framework |
Commercialactivity, agriculturalproducer |
Alignment with the family and ancestral household economy |
In alignment |
In alignment |
Ownership of reindeer |
Individual, informally distributed among the members of the family |
Private, distributed among the members of the family based on an agreement |
Employment |
Unemployed |
Employed, fromage 16 afamilymembermay join the PF |
Taxes |
Does not pay |
5 yearsreleasefromIIT, paymentstopensionandmedical fund (36,000 rubles) |
Transaction costs |
None |
None |
State retirement plan |
None |
Yes |
Medical insurance |
None |
Yes |
Statistical records |
None, existing systems of record-keeping are not applicable |
Yes |
Data credibility |
Low |
High, comes under personal responsibility |
Manageability |
Low |
High |
Land in use |
Not provided |
Possible, depending on deer numbers |
Opportunity for pasture rotation |
None |
In the event of agricultural cooperative formation |
Fish quotas |
Not provided |
Provided |
State support measures |
Not applicable |
As to agricultural producers and small entrepreneurs, also others |
Discussion |
|
|
Pros and cons for the region and the household |
Pros:nonefortheregion, relativefreedomfor the householdCons:hiddenemployment, lackofinsurance, lackofrightstosupportandresources, uncontrollable pasture rotation, impossibility of defending the interests of the household in court |
Pros:fullemployment, insurance, righttosupportandresources, legalized record, channels of managementCons:needforaccountingandtaxpayment, stronger oversight |
Mechanisms for resolving negative consequences |
Legalization through a single OLF |
Creationofcompetencecenterswhichcanperformalllegallyrequiredactions without the personal involvement of the head of household |