Effect Of Marketing And Handling Student Complaints Onstudent Satisfaction And Loyalty
Table 1:
| Constructs/Items | Loadings | Composite reliability | Average variance extracted | Variance inflation factor |
| Student Loyalty 1 | .809 | .946 | .687 | |
| SL2 | .879 | |||
| SL3 | .849 | |||
| SL4 | .845 | |||
| SL5 | .841 | |||
| SL6 | .692 | |||
| SL7 | .862 | |||
| SL8 | .838 | |||
| Student Satisfaction 1 | .838 | .933 | .700 | 3.571 |
| SS2 | .830 | |||
| SS3 | .852 | |||
| SS4 | .832 | |||
| SS5 | .845 | |||
| SS6 | .822 | |||
| Handling student complaints 1 | .840 | .949 | .673 | 3.361 |
| HSC2 | .725 | |||
| HSC3 | .827 | |||
| HSC4 | .864 | |||
| HSC5 | .790 | |||
| HSC6 | .831 | |||
| HSC7 | .825 | |||
| HSC8 | .847 | |||
| HSC9 | .826 | |||
| Relationship Marketing 1 | .755 | .880 | .516 | 3.245 |
| RM2 | .576 | |||
| RM3 | .571 | |||
| RM4 | .817 | |||
| RM5 | .795 | |||
| RM6 | .697 | |||
| RM7 | .774 |
