Effect Of Marketing And Handling Student Complaints Onstudent Satisfaction And Loyalty
Table 1:
Constructs/Items | Loadings | Composite reliability | Average variance extracted | Variance inflation factor |
Student Loyalty 1 | .809 | .946 | .687 | |
SL2 | .879 | |||
SL3 | .849 | |||
SL4 | .845 | |||
SL5 | .841 | |||
SL6 | .692 | |||
SL7 | .862 | |||
SL8 | .838 | |||
Student Satisfaction 1 | .838 | .933 | .700 | 3.571 |
SS2 | .830 | |||
SS3 | .852 | |||
SS4 | .832 | |||
SS5 | .845 | |||
SS6 | .822 | |||
Handling student complaints 1 | .840 | .949 | .673 | 3.361 |
HSC2 | .725 | |||
HSC3 | .827 | |||
HSC4 | .864 | |||
HSC5 | .790 | |||
HSC6 | .831 | |||
HSC7 | .825 | |||
HSC8 | .847 | |||
HSC9 | .826 | |||
Relationship Marketing 1 | .755 | .880 | .516 | 3.245 |
RM2 | .576 | |||
RM3 | .571 | |||
RM4 | .817 | |||
RM5 | .795 | |||
RM6 | .697 | |||
RM7 | .774 |