Evaluation Of The Financial Security Of The Competitive Environment Of The Firm
Table 2:
| Indicators | Construction firms | |||||||
| AB | DE | GH | LM | NO | QR | TV | XZ | |
| 1. Distance to the standard:1.1 CATR | 53 | 100 | 7 | 93 | 20 | 0 | 33 | 40 |
| 1.2. RWCT | 44 | 33 | 77 | 0 | 56 | 100 | 67 | 56 |
| 1.3. EBLG | 76 | 51 | 18 | 0 | 29 | 67 | 100 | 39 |
| 1.4. POST | 22 | 14 | 47 | 100 | 77 | 16 | 0 | 35 |
| 2. The sum of the distances | 195 | 198 | 149 | 193 | 182 | 183 | 200 | 170 |
| 3. Company rank | 6 | 7 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 8 | 2 |
| 4. The remoteness of the company | 46 | 49 | 0 | 44 | 33 | 34 | 51 | 21 |
| 5. Ranks | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
| 5. Firms | GH | XZ | NO | QR | LM | AB | DE | TV |
| 5. Distance scale | 0 | 41 | 65 | 67 | 87 | 90 | 95 | 100 |
