European Proceedings Logo

A Mixed Type Method For Assessing Regional Innovation Potential (Example Of Tatarstan)

Table 3:

Group Indicators Individual significance value Compound significance value
Scientific and human potential Share of R&D personnel (H1) 0,651 0,621
Share of doctors, candidates of sciences, graduate students, doctoral students in economically active population (Н2) 0,535
Proportion of graduate students completed a dissertation in the total number of graduates (N3) 0,475
Share of employees with higher education in economically active population (Н4) 0,789
Share of university students in economically active population (Н5) 0,657
Technical potential Share of imports of innovative technologies and products in the total exports of the region (T1) 0,792 0,639
Share of innovation-active companies in the total number of companies in the region (T2) 0,745
Share of organizations that used information and communication technologies in the total number of organizations in the region (T3) 0,478
Coefficient of renewal of fixed assets (T4) 0,652
Coefficient of validity of fixed assets (T5) 0,659
Share of costs for info-communication technologies in GRP (T6) 0,506
Financial and economic potential Ratio of investment in GRP (E1) 0,744 0,613
Ratio of costs for R & D and GRP (E2) 0,612
Share of innovative products in GRP (E3) 0,656
Share of intangible assets in GRP (E4) 0,569
Profitability of production (E5) 0,589
Share of profitable enterprises (E6) 0,509
Comfortable development of innovation potential 0,632
< Back to article