Project Management As A Factor Of Effectiveness Improving Of Regulatory Impact Assessment
Table 2:
| 2016 | Points | Municipal district, city district | 2017 | Points | Municipal district, city district |
| Highest level | 73 | Okulovsky | Highest level | 73 | Novgorod |
| 66 | Novgorod | 72 | Okulovsky | ||
| Good level | 65 | Batetsky | 70 | Chudovsky | |
| 65 | Chudovsky | 69 | Malоvishersky | ||
| 63 | Malоvishersky | 64 | Marevsky | ||
| 63 | Moshenskoy | 64 | Borovichsky | ||
| 63 | Parfinо | 63 | Parfinо | ||
| 62 | Marevsky | 63 | Batetsky | ||
| 59 | Volotovsky | 62 | Veliky Novgorod | ||
| 55 | Veliky Novgorod | Good level | 60 | Valdai | |
| 52 | Pestovsky | 59 | Volotovsky | ||
| 51 | Krestetsky | 58 | Demyansky | ||
| Satisfactory level | 49 | Soletsky | 57 | Krestetsky | |
| 47 | Demyansky | 57 | Lubytinsky | ||
| 47 | Lubytinsky | 57 | Moshenskoy | ||
| 43 | Staroryssky | 55 | Pestovsky | ||
| 39 | Borovichsky | 55 | Poddorsky | ||
| 38 | Valday | 54 | Soletsky | ||
| 38 | Shimsky | 48 | Staroryssky | ||
| 34 | Holmsky | 48 | Hvoininsky | ||
| Unsatisfactory level | 32 | Poddorsky | 44 | Holmsky | |
| 26 | Hvoininsky | Satisfactory level | 38 | Shimsky |
