Project Management As A Factor Of Effectiveness Improving Of Regulatory Impact Assessment
Table 2:
2016 | Points | Municipal district, city district | 2017 | Points | Municipal district, city district |
Highest level | 73 | Okulovsky | Highest level | 73 | Novgorod |
66 | Novgorod | 72 | Okulovsky | ||
Good level | 65 | Batetsky | 70 | Chudovsky | |
65 | Chudovsky | 69 | Malоvishersky | ||
63 | Malоvishersky | 64 | Marevsky | ||
63 | Moshenskoy | 64 | Borovichsky | ||
63 | Parfinо | 63 | Parfinо | ||
62 | Marevsky | 63 | Batetsky | ||
59 | Volotovsky | 62 | Veliky Novgorod | ||
55 | Veliky Novgorod | Good level | 60 | Valdai | |
52 | Pestovsky | 59 | Volotovsky | ||
51 | Krestetsky | 58 | Demyansky | ||
Satisfactory level | 49 | Soletsky | 57 | Krestetsky | |
47 | Demyansky | 57 | Lubytinsky | ||
47 | Lubytinsky | 57 | Moshenskoy | ||
43 | Staroryssky | 55 | Pestovsky | ||
39 | Borovichsky | 55 | Poddorsky | ||
38 | Valday | 54 | Soletsky | ||
38 | Shimsky | 48 | Staroryssky | ||
34 | Holmsky | 48 | Hvoininsky | ||
Unsatisfactory level | 32 | Poddorsky | 44 | Holmsky | |
26 | Hvoininsky | Satisfactory level | 38 | Shimsky |