Cambridge Compromise As A Method Of Degressively Proportional Distribution Of Goods
Table 2:
| b = 1 | b = 2 | |
| 10 | 3 | 3 |
| 18 | 3 | 4 |
| 40 | 6 | 5 |
| 40 | 6 | 5 |
| 60 | 6 | 6 |
| Total: 170 | Total: H = 22 | Total: H = 22 |
| b = 1 | b = 2 | |
| 10 | 3 | 3 |
| 18 | 3 | 4 |
| 40 | 6 | 5 |
| 40 | 6 | 5 |
| 60 | 6 | 6 |
| Total: 170 | Total: H = 22 | Total: H = 22 |