European Proceedings Logo

Positive Behaviour Support To Manage Challenging Behaviour Of Children On Autism Spectrum

Table 1:

Six primary quality indicator PI score Six secondary quality indicator SI score
Study PC IV DY BC VA EC Max.6 IOA Kp F BR GM SY Max.6 Quality Rating
Becker-Cottrill (2003) 1 1 1 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 Weak
Binnendy (2009) 1 1 1 1 1 0 5 1 0 0 0 1 1 3 Adequate
Blair (2011) 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 1 0 1 0 1 1 4 Strong
Cheremsbynski (2013) 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 1 0 1 0 1 1 4 Strong
Dunlap (1999) 1 1 1 1 1 0 5 1 0 0 0 0 2 Adequate
Lee (2007) 0 1 1 1 1 1 5 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 Adequate
Lucyshyn (2007) 1 1 1 1 1 0 5 1 0 0 0 1 1 3 Adequate
Marshall (2002) 1 1 1 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 Weak
McClean (2012} 1 1 1 0 1 1 5 0 0 1 0 1 1 3 Adequate
Notes: Six primary quality indicators: PC participant characteristics, IV independent variable, DV dependent variable, BC baseline condition, VA visual analysis, EC experimental control, PI score: total score for the primary quality indicators.
Six secondary quality indicators: IOA inter-observer agreement, Kp kappa, F fidelity, BR blind raters, GM generalization and/or maintenance, SV social validity, SJ score: total score for the secondary quality indicators.
Quality rating criteria: Strong: scores on all six primary quality indicators and at least three secondary quality indicators; Adequate: scores on at least four primary quality indicators and at least two secondary quality indicators; Weak: scores on less than four primary quality indicators and less than two secondary quality indicators.
< Back to article