| No |
Author |
Findings |
| 1 |
Nalband and Al Kelabi (2014) |
The author proposed the latest Universal CSR model by indorsing that legal responsibility as the basic obligation of the business social responsibility, even though Carroll (1999) disagreed with this idea. Carroll’s contended that company’s social responsibility is not only to conform the elementary law. Furthermore, this model does not illustrate how the businesses ought to act to protect the environment. |
| 2 |
Les Tien-Shang Lee (2012) |
The author validated social responsibility model on environmental performance where, the indirect effects through corporate environmental responsibility is directly influenced by instrumental motives and political motives. The results also confirm that these cause-effect relationships leads to the corporate environmental responsibility. Besides, it was presented that instrumental drives have marginal effects on both corporate environmental responsibility and environmental performance, and the marginal effects of political drives on environmental performance are also certainly shown. |
| 3 |
Agyekum-Mensah et al. (2012) |
Agyekum-Mensah et. al. (2012) proposed a sustainability model in achieving sustainable construction. They offered an additional meaning to the classification of sustainable development, as the present delineations appear to be ambiguous. However, the model fails to describe how sustainable construction would help in terms of ethical environmental protection issue. |
| 4 |
Delai and Takahashi (2011) |
Delai and Takahashi (2011) established a model to observed corporate sustainability elements into organization’s structure in order to assist them to embed sustainability into daily activities and whole culture. Nevertheless, the model presents a broad review of sustainability concepts without focusing on the strengths and shortcomings of each sustainability initiative especially in the environmental protection’s perspective. |
| 5 |
Visser (2010) |
Visser (2010) offered CSR 2.0 model, focused on implementing an essentially ecological and accountable business model, reinforced by a transformed monetary system. Obviously, the model was most dedicated with financial purpose to confirm the feasibility of the model rather than environmental protection as the central importance. |
