Education for Sustainability: Current Status, Prospects, and Directions


Sustainability is a complex concept that is addressed by most companies, and is the direction of their development. Culture and education for sustainable development must start from higher education. At the level of higher education, the presence of sustainability subjects was mainly assessed in the curricula of study and also the understanding of the concept among students. In Romania these studies are not defined in depth. Also a comparative analysis of students' knowledge and understanding of the concept in business (after graduating higher education) has yet to be made. The purpose of this paper is to highlight the current level of education for students and the business environment basedon the sustainability principles. The first objective of this paper was to review and present the previous research on Education for Sustainable Development (ESD). The second objective was to identify and assess the current level of ESD in Romania.

Keywords: Higher educationsustainable developmentbehavior changeattitude


Traditionally companies have no concerns beyond those strictly related to business activity, all

resource allocations being designed to achieve their economic objectives and reflected ultimately in

profit. Lately this business behaviour began to change, with the focus on sustainability and aligning with

European requirements on environmental, social and economic dimensions. In recent studies (Baleanu et

al., 2014; Viegas et al., 2016) it is pointed out that companies are starting to become increasingly

involved in the sustainable development and understand the meaning of the concept in its entirety.

An important role in promoting the concept of sustainability is held by institutions of higher

education and especially at the post-graduate level (Baleanu et al., 2010; Moraru et al., 2014). In the case

when the post-graduate students perceive and understand what the concept is, then sustainability reporting

in companies where they work or will work has no longer any barrier.

This paper aims to identify the current level of involvement in the sustainable development of

communities in Romania and assess the level of understanding of the concept for students in higher


Problem Statement

A growing number of organizations seeking to develop sustainable operations and align with

international requirements. Moreover, expectations that long-term profitability is directly proportional to

social responsibility and environmental protection, are advancing. Involvement in sustainability reporting

helps organizations to set goals, to measure performance and manage change in order to achieve

sustainable operations. A sustainability report submits information on the impact of an organization, be it

positive or negative, on the environment, society and economy (Mocan et al., 2015). Involvement in

sustainability reporting contributes to long-term development of the organization, but also to improving

the image in front of the stakeholders. The reporting environment can be chosen by the organization.

Electronic or online reports and reports on paper are two appropriate media for reporting. Organizations

can choose to use a combination of web and reports on paper or use only one medium. From this

perspective, researching the awareness and adoption of this concept is helpful. To investigate the

awareness and adoption, the research is based on the degree of learning of the concept of sustainable

development among undergraduate and graduate students, and among the companies in Romania.

So, the students represent the human resource that will contribute to business development (Popa

et al., 2015; Vassigh et al., 2014). The students do not have the basic elements of education for

sustainable development (ESD). A number of studies highlight the fact that students do not have the

sustainability knowledge (Viegas et al., 2016; Chaiwichit, 2016). In Barth's and Rieckmann study in

2012, it is noted that students should acquire skills for sustainable living and be able to understand the

link between interaction and consequences over a long period of time. In 2013, Boutou confirms that

future professionals must be prepared from the perspective of sustainability to be competitive and be

hired easily by companies. In the studies Godemann et al. (2014), Amaral et al. (2015), and Haskova et

al. (2016) it is shown the important role that sustainable development plays in the curriculum of the


Therefore, knowledge on sustainable development is needed among students. With this purpose a

questionnaire was developed that was first applied to students in higher education to identify the level of

knowledge of the concept. The second survey was carried out for companies in Romania, being applied to

identify the involvement of these companies in sustainable development. Therefore, the research is based

on two directions:

§The questionnaire survey applied in academia, and

§The questionnaire survey applied to business.

Research Questions

This research aims to answer the questions: “What are the sustainability principles to be followed?

What are the future directions in terms of ESD?”, and to highlight the degree to which human resource

and companies are interested in these principles and directions of development.

Sustainability Principles

The involvement in sustainable development is a concern for many companies in Romania as there

is little understanding of how it is perceived by companies and by human resource. Among the basic

principles of sustainable development set forth in the Rio Declaration on Environment and Development

(UNEP, 2016) are:

§Development of the companies must involve not only concern for the environment, it must

involve respect for society and the balance of financial resources.

§Environmental protection must be an integral part of development processes and no individual

activities should be taken for its protection. Companies must equitably support poverty

eradication and gender equality in the workplace.

§Companies and businesses should meet most people's needs in a balanced way, with no

differences between human resources.

§Environmental issues need to be approached by involving all stakeholders.

§There must be international cooperation to promote an open international economic system that

will lead to economic growth and sustainable development in all countries, with no differences.

§The involvement of women and youth, courage, creativity and knowledge of people are the

dimensions that are supporting the sustainable development.

The directions of sustainable development

In order to assess the degree of involvement in the sustainable development of a number of

organizations conduct evaluations performed without the use of international reporting standard. There is

no legislation to impose sustainability reporting under a standardized form, so due to the complexity of

international reporting many organizations choose a simple evaluation of all activities. According to the

last version of sustainable development reporting, Global Report Initiative - GRI G4, the main

development directions are presented below in Table 01 :

Table 1 -
See Full Size >

Purpose of the Study

The purpose of this paper is to highlight the current level of education for students and the

business environment on the sustainability principles. The first objective of this paper was to review and

present the previous research on ESD. The second objective was to identify and assess the current level of

ESD in Romania. Based on the principles and directions of sustainable development, this research used

two questionnaires that were applied among students (600 students) and companies in Romania. (100


Research Methods

Focus groups were conducted in this study to identify the current level of education in terms of

sustainability. For the business environment a questionnaire was applied to identify the level of

knowledge of this process of sustainable development.

The questionnaire survey applied to the academic environment

To assess the level of education in terms of sustainability in academia a questionnaire survey was

used, emphasizing the closed questions due to the complexity of the concept. The questionnaire is

structured in three main directions:

§Assessment of subjects in the curriculum - preferences, learning styles and teaching methods.

§Knowledge of sustainability concept - the degree of perception of this complex concept.

§Students’ adaptability to business requirements, desire for knowledge and involvement in of

the students in organizations.

The questionnaire survey applied to companies in Romania

The research directions of this questionnaire are:

§Company identification through various elements - to outline the profile of the organization.

§ Risk management in organizations - sustainable development involves risk assessment

because it is present in every activity and there is no durability without hazard and threats


§Standardization and globalization - sustainability leads to standardization of processes and the

implementation of international standards.

§Sustainability - perception and implementation of sustainability principles and directions.

The entire research design is shown in Figure 01 below, starting from directions and theoretical

principles, evaluating the perception of sustainability in business and among students and directions are

obtained to be followed for global sustainable development.

Figure 1: Research structure
Research structure
See Full Size >


The study outlines that inclusion of courses on sustainable development contributes to the

development of a sustainable business, sustainable companies and of sustainable jobs. The results of

applying the questionnaires are collated below.

Interpretation of results obtained in academia

From the questionnaire applied to academia some information was obtained that is consistent with

the international direction. As underlined by Barth and Rieckmann (2012), students should possess basic

information on sustainability because knowledge in this area is minimal. The centralisation of results

obtained are presented in Table 2 .

Table 2 -
See Full Size >

After analysing the results obtained the following can highlighted:

§39% of respondents prefer as the method for problem solving the stimulating of creativity and

only 15% prefer individual study.

In terms of typology of teachers, 68% of respondents want the teacher to take the role of

initiator in teaching.

§Of the respondents 87% are defined by the visual style, 28.2% the auditory style, 7.7% tactical

and 2.6% kinaesthetic.

§In terms of study subjects, economic subjects are covering 33% of the curriculum, and those

relating to environmental and social practices are not covered very well.

§From the perspective of sustainability, very few respondents were able to define the concept of

sustainability, and its implications have not been identified.

§18% of students are employed (those in final years) and 52% apply the theoretical knowledge

in the workplace.

§Study visits are present starting with the 2nd year of study, being performed annually, together

with internships.

Interpretation of results obtained in business

After analysing the results obtained after applying the questionnaire to 100 companies in Romania

it is seen that most know the concept of sustainability and perform various activities in this direction. The

results are summarized in Table 03 and are discussed below.

Table 3 -
See Full Size >

From the results obtained from the business environment on the 100 companies it is observed that:

§In 52% of these there is a risk manager and 91% of them consider as important the risk

management for the organization.

§32% of organizations bear the financial consequences directly, using borrowed or own funds,

and 68% transfer the risk, that means that they have an insurance contract.

§Most companies have implemented at least the quality standard, registering a proportion of


§61% of the organizations are involved in international efforts that lead to global development

and are contributing directly to the development of the company.

§From the perspective of sustainability, it is noticed that lately the concept of sustainability is

fully understood by most organizations, registering 75% percent.

§Sustainability defining was done correctly by 69%. They correctly identified the 3

responsibilities of sustainability: economic, social and environmental.

§Over 90% of respondents develop activities to protect the environment and all companies

support the society.

§Financial analyses are performed mainly at the end of the year, and costs and benefits analysis

is performed by most companies, i.e. 92%.

§Reporting sustainability is achieved by 85% of companies and only 43% of them use the

Global Report Initiatives - GRI.


Finally, it can be concluded that inclusion of materials on sustainable development contributes to

the development of a sustainable environment and sustainable businesses. The relationship between

education and sustainable development is a directly proportional one.

From the analysis conducted in this paper, in Romania, the following can be concluded:

§The concept of sustainability is perceived by most companies, but reporting is not realized in

standardized form. This could be complemented by a series of courses that can be achieved in

the years of study.

§Respect for the environment and society can be shaped even during the years of study so that

when the student is hired this mind set is already intact.

§Various financial analyses are performed at the superficial level or only on the final financial

results, which could be supplemented by courses in academia.

§To apply the theoretical knowledge as many agreements with companies should be concluded

to increase employability percentage in final year of study.

§Introducing new trends and directions concerning the development of the business


In conclusion, it can be said that the business environment in Romania is in continuous

development and is aligning with international requirements. The students are interested in business

requirements and prefer to be employed after graduation. This is supported also by the idea that during

the years of study, hiring students is done without the necessary qualifications and thus the pay is low.


  1. Aleixo, A.M., Leal, S., Azeiteiro, U.M. (2016). Conceptualization of Sustainable Higher Education Institutions, Roles, Barriers, and Challenges for Sustainability: An exploratory Atudy in Portugal, Journal of Cleaner Production (2016), DOI: 10.1016/ j.jclepro.2016.11.010
  2. Amaral, L.P., Martins, N., Gouveia, J.B. (2015). Quest for a Sustainable University: A Review. Int. J. Sustain. High. Educ. 16, 155-172, Available at DOI: 10.1108/IJSHE- 02-2013-0017.
  3. Baleanu, V., Irimie, S., Ionica, A.C., Irimie, S.I. (2010). Student Support Services Enabling Quality and Sustainability in Higher Education: Academic Advising, 6th International Seminar on the Quality Management in Higher Education, 39-42.
  4. Baleanu, V, Irimie, S., Irimie S. (2014). Corporate Social Responsibility in Romania: From Conceptual Frameworks to Concrete Actions, 4th Review of Management and Economic Engineering International Management Conference, 150-157.
  5. Barth, M., Rieckmann, M. (2012). Academic staff development as a catalyst for curriculum change towards education for sustainable development: an output perspective. Cleaner Production Journal, Vol. 26, 28-36.
  6. Boutou, A. (2013). Sustainability in Higher Education. Benefits and Career Prospects with an Interdisciplinary Higher Education Degree. Master Thesis in Environmental Studies and Sustainability Science. LUCSUS, Lund University, Sweden.
  7. Chaiwichit, C. (2016). Developing of the Measurement Model of Self-Directed Learning Characteristics, 4th Annual International Conference on Cognitive - Social, and Behavioural Sciences, Vol.8, 7-17.
  8. Godemann, J., Bebbington, J., Herzig, C., Moon, J. (2014). Higher education and sustainable development: exploring possibilities for organisational change. Account. Auditing Account. Journal, Vol. 27, 218-233. DOI: 10.1108/AAAJ-12- 2013-1553.
  9. Global Report Initiatives – GRI G4 (2016). Available at
  10. Haskova, A., Dvorjakova, S. (2016). Analysis of Technology Education Development at Schools in Slovakia, 4th Annual International Conference on Cognitive - Social, and Behavioural Sciences, Vol.8, 236-245.
  11. Mocan, M., Rus, S., Draghici, A., Ivascu L., Turi, A. (2015). Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility Practices on The Banking Industry in Romania, 2nd Global Conference on Business, Economics, Management and Tourism, Vol. 23, 712-716.
  12. Moraru, R.I., Babut, G.B., Cioca, L.I. (2014). Rationale and Criteria Development for Risk Assessment Tool Selection in Work Environments. Environmental Engineering and Management Journal, Vol. 13(6), 1371-1376.
  13. Popa, F., Guillermin, M., Dedeurwaerdere, T., (2015). A Pragmatist Approach to Transdisciplinarity in Sustainability Research: From Complex Systems Theory to Reflexive Science. Futures Journal, Vol. 65, 45-56.
  14. United Nations Environment Programme (2016). Principles of Sustainable Development, Available at of_Sustainable_Development.pdf
  15. Vassigh, S., Spiegelhalter, T., (2014). Integrated Design Pedagogy for Energy Efficient Design Tools for Teaching Carbon Neutral Building Design. Energy Procedia, Vol. 57, 2062-2069.
  16. Viegas, C.V., Bond, A.J., Vaz R.C., Borchardt, M., Medeiros Pereira, G., Selig, P.M., Varvakis, G. (2016). Critical attributes of Sustainability in Higher Education: A Categorisation from Literature Review. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 126, 260-276.

Copyright information

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

About this article

Publication Date

27 January 2017

eBook ISBN



Future Academy



Print ISBN (optional)


Edition Number

1st Edition




Child psychology, developmental psychology, occupational psychology, industrial psychology, ethical issues

Cite this article as:

Ivascu, L., Tămășilă, M., Tăucean, I., Cioca, L., & Izvercian, M. (2017). Education for Sustainability: Current Status, Prospects, and Directions. In Z. Bekirogullari, M. Y. Minas, & R. X. Thambusamy (Eds.), Cognitive - Social, and Behavioural Sciences - icCSBs 2017, January, vol 20. European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences (pp. 259-267). Future Academy.