European Proceedings Logo

An Investigation of Decision Making Practice upon Sustainable Property Investment in Medan City, Indonesia

Table 1:

 No Statement Mean Std. Deviation
A2 Investment in sustainable property is not profitable 2.35 1.231
A3 Return and risk in sustainable property investment are balanced 2.425 1.238
B4 Return from sustainable properties is higher than interest rate 2.625 1.212
B5 Sustainable properties have short payback period than conventional property 3.45 0.749
C4 Sustainable property has high appreciated value 3.8 0.823
D1 Sustainable property is urgent to be realized 3.95 1.218
D2 Responsibility towards environment is important 4.475 1.085
D3 I will develop sustainable property 3.875 1.113
D4 Building with sustainable concept may safe energy efficiency 3.825 1.106
D5 Developer has a responsibility on environment 4.25 0.898
E2 Sustainable property is only a trend 2.95 1.085
E3 Sustainable property is suitable to be applied in high class housing 2.775 1.310
E4 Sustainability property is suitable to be applied in commercial building 3.35 1.350
F1 My team can develop sustainable property with efficient cost 3.65 1.098
F2 Developer team can develop sustainable property with good design 4.025 1.049
F4 I have experience in developing sustainable property 3.625 1.005
G1 The government policy supports sustainable property development 3.425 1.298
H3 There is an appreciation in the form of reward for developers that apply the sustainability concept 3.325 1.639
I1 I have developed sustainable property 3.125 1.471
I2 I have developed housing with water efficiency 3.425 1.238
I3 I put up green space in my property project 3.725 1.281
I4 I use the eco-friendly material 3.725 1.154
I6 Developer has developed quick access path 4.175 0.957
< Back to article