The Role of Monitoring Raters in Ensuring Accurate and Meaningful Test Scores. Case Study: RFL Examinations
Table 3:
| Rater 1 | Rater 2 | |
| Candidate 1 | 5 | 4 |
| Candidate 2 | 4 | 4 |
| Candidate 3 | 4 | 5 |
| Candidate 4 | 3 | 5 |
| Candidate 5 | 2 | 3 |
| Candidate 6 | 1 | 1 |
| Candidate 7 | 3 | 3 |
| Candidate 8 | 3 | 4 |
| Candidate 9 | 4 | 4 |
| Pearson correlation coefficient | 0.73598 | |