Justification Of Optimal Material And Technical Structure Of Agricultural Enterprise
Table 1: Development scenarios
| Index | Actual values, 2019 | Development scenario | ||
| Optimistic | Realistic | Pessimistic | ||
| Sown area structure, %: | 100,0 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| Cereals and legumes | 21,1 | 22,9 | 22,4 | 23,9 |
| - winter wheat | 10,5 | 11,4 | 11,1 | 11,9 |
| - corn for grain | 0,9 | 1,0 | 1,0 | 1,0 |
| - oats | 1,1 | 1,2 | 1,2 | 1,2 |
| - barley | 6,9 | 7,5 | 7,3 | 7,8 |
| Rice | 58,3 | 54,6 | 56,5 | 50,0 |
| Oilseeds | 0,5 | 0,6 | 0,6 | 0,3 |
| - winter rape | 0,5 | 0,6 | 0,6 | 0,3 |
| Fodder crops | 20,2 | 21,9 | 20,5 | 25,8 |
| - annual herbs | 1,8 | 1,9 | 1,8 | 2,3 |
| - perennial herbs | 13,0 | 14,1 | 13,2 | 16,6 |
| - corn for feed | 5,4 | 5,8 | 5,5 | 6,9 |
| Livestock of cattle, head | 400 | 484,0 | 421,0 | 389,0 |
| including cows | 400 | 484,0 | 421,0 | 389,0 |
| Fixed assets cost, million rubles | 309,6 | 356,1 | 340,3 | 339,6 |
| Profit, million rubles | 84,3 | 249,3 | 116,7 | 533,9 |
| Profitability level, % | 17,2 | 37,1 | 31,4 | 4,8 |