European Proceedings Logo

The Influence of Anti-Smoking Campaign Among University Students

Table 6: The Quit Smoking Hierarchy Regression Model

  R R2 R2 B Std. β t
      Change    Error    
Block 1 .114 .013*
Age -.030 .014 -.082* -2.103
Education -.122 .125 -.042 -.982
Income .163 .071 .097* 2.289
Block 2 .457 .219*** .196***
Age -.021 .013 -.058 -1.657
Education -.281 .112 -.098* -2.504
Income .144 .064 .085* 2.254
Belief in message .130 .010 .448*** 12.971
Block 3 .459 .221*** .002***
Age -.025 .013 -.068 -1.884
Education -.278 .112 -.097* -2.479
Income .141 .064 .084* 2.208
Belief in message .130 .010 .448*** 12.962
Attitude on campaign -.023 .019 -.041 -1.161
Block 4 .466 .228*** .007***
Age -.033 .014 -.090* -2.433
Education -.290 .112 -.101** -2.586
Income .136 .064 .080* 2.129
Belief in message .123 .010 .424*** 11.877
Attitude on campaign -.020 .019 -.036 -1.034
Smoking frequency     .042 .017 .089* 2.449
Note. Statistical significance: *p < .05; **p < .01; ***p < .001
< Back to article