In modern conditions, legal systems interact closely and influence each other. This influence becomes especially noticeable in the process of serious reform. However, such a process cannot proceed smoothly, the main problem is primarily in connection with the adoption and implementation of the experience of foreign states. The main feature of this process is that the adoption of the best foreign practices occurs haphazardly, chaotically and taking into account certain political interests, without taking into account the interests of the state and national interests. This situation arises when studying international and European law, comparing the standards of regulation of certain public relations. Knowledge of the essence of these norms, the possibility of their compatibility with national norms, the ways of their harmonious interaction should become systemic. The legal reality of our time is determined by the process of mutual influence of various legal systems, a dialogue of cultures, a combination of traditions and innovations in legal consciousness and legal development. All this gives a powerful impetus for comparative legal research, including in the Russian Federation. In this context, the need to address fundamental issues in the methodology of comparative legal research becomes especially urgent. The need to solve this problem is due to the search for ways to improve the methodology of comparative jurisprudence, which is even more actualized in our time against the background of the gradual scientific institutionalization of this area of legal research. Comparative jurisprudence is the only discipline that can accomplish this task.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
About this article
29 November 2021
Print ISBN (optional)
Cultural development, technological development, socio-political transformations, globalization
Cite this article as:
Kagermanov, A. S., Idilov, I. I., & Dadaev, H. M. (2021). On The Question Of The Main Directions Of Comparative Jurisprudence. In D. K. Bataev, S. A. Gapurov, A. D. Osmaev, V. K. Akaev, L. M. Idigova, M. R. Ovhadov, A. R. Salgiriev, & M. M. Betilmerzaeva (Eds.), Social and Cultural Transformations in The Context of Modern Globalism, vol 117. European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences (pp. 2161-2168). European Publisher. https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2021.11.285