The Technology Of Rotation Model Of Blended Learning Method In Technical Institutions
Table 2: Comparison between the efficiency and relation to Group under Control and Experimental Group
| Group | Mean Score | Data | Efficiency value | Size of Effect | |||
| Efficiency | Before test | Control | 10.03 | 2.50 | -0.363 (NS) | 0.069 | |
| Experim | 9.80 | 3.99 | |||||
| After test | Control | 29.27 | 3.99 | 3.341 (S) | 0.794 | ||
| Experim | 32.37 | 3.13 | |||||
| Relation Toward EFL | Personal Assurance | Before test | Control | 3.43 | 0.45 | -0.059 (NS) | 0.027 |
| Experim | 3.40 | 0.32 | |||||
| Usefulness | Control | 3.45 | 0.40 | 0.473 (NS) | 0.118 | ||
| Experim | 3.49 | 0.29 | |||||
| Teacher’s Relation | Control | 3.64 | 0.37 | 0.100 (NS) | 0.026 | ||
| Experim | 3.64 | 0.39 | |||||
| Personal Assurance | After test | Control | 3.50 | 0.78 | 2.803 (S) | 0.786 | |
| Experim | 4.04 | 0.49 | |||||
| Usefulness | Control | 3.49 | 0.46 | 3.165 (S) | 0.809 | ||
| Experim | 3.95 | 0.51 | |||||
| Teacher’s Relation | Control | 3.94 | 0.64 | 0.482 (NS) | 0.139 | ||
| Experim | 4.01 | 0.54 | |||||
| Note. C– Considerable InS – Insignificant | |||||||
