European Proceedings Logo

Interaction Specifics Between Main Factors Of Grp Production (Russian Federation, Northern Russia)

Table 2: PF CES parameters (2) for 2000–2018, capital (p) and labor (q) substitution elasticity (p), R2 (4), AICc (3) (calculated by the authors using the data provided by the Federal State Statistics Department)

Region γ δ ρ ν s R2 AICc
Russian Federation 0.09 0.36 0.44 1.55 0.69 0.92 67.42
Republic of Karelia 5.60 1.03 21.04 0.68 0.14 0.74 77.90
Republic of Komi 4.00 0.56 1.92 0.67 0.23 0.89 65.42
Arkhangelsk region 1.89 1.01 20.89 0.69 0.06 0.75 110.11
Nenets Autonomous District 0.00 0.29 10.00 1.76 0.20 0.79 111.04
Murmansk region 36.09 1.02 60.33 0.18 0.05 0.20 71.09
Khanty-Mansi Autonomous District 6.47 1.00 64.97 0.71 0.02 0.46 103.45
Yamal-Nenets Autonomous District 0.02 0.07 -1.02 1.67 1.5x107 0.95 72.03
Republic of Tyva 19.43 0.67 0.98 0.42 0.46 0.87 71.82
Republic of Sakha 9.76 1.03 22.30 0.48 0.01 0.87 89.99
Kamchatka Krai 3.97 1.01 87.77 0.58 0.02 0.69 100.69
Magadan region 10.99 0.20 -1.03 0.78 6.9x107 0.77 67.87
Sakhalin region 0.00 0.39 2.66 5.88 0.24 0.71 145.55
Chukotka Autonomous District 11.44 1.01 19.67 0.53 0.11 0.67 152.22
< Back to article