European Proceedings Logo

Digital Education For Physical Culture And Sport: Views And Experience

Figure 11: Analysis of the contingency table by the relationship “Course * Gender” from the determinant “Gender” (feedback; %; p ≤ 0.05; by the criterion of agreement X2 Pearson with normalization of its value in relation to the size of the sample by criterion V Cramer) (filling “oblique cell” – 1st year graduate students (n = 12), filling “balls” – 2nd year graduate students (n = 11); 1 – male graduate students (n = 17), 2 – female graduate students (n = 6))

Analysis of the contingency table by the relationship “Course * Gender” from the determinant “Gender” (feedback; %; p ≤ 0.05; by the criterion of agreement X2 Pearson with normalization of its value in relation to the size of the sample by criterion V Cramer) (filling “oblique cell” – 1st year graduate students (n = 12), filling “balls” – 2nd year graduate students (n = 11); 1 – male graduate students (n = 17), 2 – female graduate students (n = 6))
< Back to article