Abstract
This article presents the results of the small-scale research on the pedagogical challenges and emotional issues of teachers who have trained in mainstream education, with at-risk and socially excluded youth in Israel. The purpose of the study is to gather information about these challenges in order to prepare them for work with at-risk and socially excluded youth with the help of professional s Support and mentoring that will improve their work and even provide a better and more effective response to youth. The study adopted a qualitative research approach, using semi-structured interviews. The findings show that teachers who have trained in mainstream education, people at risk and adolescents experience pedagogical challenges that are reflected in working with the learner and their experiences, with the educational staff and in the face of demand from the education system. Also, these teachers experience many emotional issues that are reflected by physical and psychological factors.
Keywords: At-risk youthtechnology education centerteacher challengespedagogical challengesemotional issues
Introduction
In Israel, more than 2 million children live, of whom 330,000 children and adolescents are at risk and in distress, with some of the risk situations being manifested in detachment from normative frameworks (Children and Youth at Risk - Ministry of Labor, Welfare and Social Services in Israel, 2018). In the last decade, reforms have been introduced in the vocational education systems of developed countries according to the outlines of the World Labor Organization (n.d.), with one of its goals being to prevent dropouts from schools. In light of this, alternative educational frameworks have been established with the aim of providing a solution to the population at risk who have dropped out of the system. Technology education centers are one of the alternative education frameworks, under the supervision of the Ministry of Education, which provide a solution to the population at risk who have dropped out of the regular framework. Cohen-Navot et al. (2001), stated that the professional training of teachers who teach in these settings is normal and not adapted to work with a population at risk that needs a different therapeutic and pedagogical response and as a result encounter many challenges in their work. In this article, we will try to understand what pedagogical and emotional issues these teachers face, through their personal stories and experiences. It opens with a theoretical background that deals with at-risk youth in Israel, their characteristics and directions for action to reduce the phenomenon, as well as their integration in technological education centers the importance of professional development among teachers.
Youth at risk in Israel - Definition, Characteristics and Action directions
In 2008, the Israeli government adopted a uniform definition of children and youth at risk. The definition was formulated by the Schmid Committee (2006), the public committee for examining the situation of children and adolescents at risk and distress, headed by Professor Hillel Schmid, which was based on the Convention on the Rights of the Child and accepted definitions in the professional literature and policy makers in Israel. By definition, children and youth are at risk of life in situations that endanger them in their family and environment, and as a result of these situations their ability to exercise their rights in seven areas of life is impaired - in each area several situations are defined that indicate risk in this area:
This report was submitted to the Government of Israel as a strategic action plan for the years 2006-2010 for the improvement of the well-being of children and youth at risk and in distress. Its aim was to reduce the extent of risk and distress as much as possible, and in the ways proposed in it to return children and adolescents to the normal and normative cycle of life.
Emphasizing one of the risk situations that appear in Schmid's (2006) definition, learning and acquiring skills, a direct link was found between dropping out of school and its far-reaching negative consequences for the lives and futures of boys and girls (Richman & Bowen, 1997). The youth, who fail to get the most out of the education system, have led to the development of many programs in the education systems. Donmoyer and Kos (1993), distinguished between two approaches to these programs: "complementary" approaches, aimed only at needy students versus approaches aimed at improving the education of the general population, so that the weak students benefit along with the rest of their classmates.
In the next chapter, we will discuss one of the frameworks according to the "complementary" approach, as an alternative educational framework - which will refer to a technological educational center.
Alternative educational framework - Technological Educational Center
Education centers are another important national service in the alternative education system. These frameworks, which are operated by local authorities and various education networks, under the supervision of the "Shahar" Division of the Ministry of Education, are intended to serve youth who have dropped out of the regular system. These are relatively small schools with a combination of academic and vocational education, Students with normal abilities and intelligence will be accepted, characterized as students with multiple needs and at risk, who need a multidisciplinary holistic therapeutic educational system and were referred on the recommendation of a local community center / perseverance committee for this framework. The main objectives of the education centers are: a. Preventing students from dropping out of the education system and ending 12 years of schooling. b. Giving a significant certificate as part of a social and occupational concept. c. Completion of educational gaps (for ninth graders). d. Strengthening self-image and raising personal sense of competence. e. Social mobility: preparation for military service / national service or civil service and integration into the world of employment and academia. f. Involvement and contribution to a community known to have a positive impact on students' social and academic achievement, strengthening their confidence, reducing risky behaviors, and increasing the degree of happiness in their lives (Ministry of Education, State of Israel, 2020)
Issues in the professional development of teachers in Israel
The professional development of teachers in Israel raises many issues due to different perceptions of staff and policy makers, school principals and teachers. These create unregulated and unsupervised competition for the time and resources of the lucrative teacher. The Ministry of Education and school principals have their own demands for internships and advanced training, and as a result the teacher's professional development lacks a clear guideline that guides him step by step and gradually builds his expertise (Abdor, 2008).
Many teachers have reported changes in their careers (beyond teaching at a different level of education; entering the role of a classroom educator; a change in the teaching profession, changes that undoubtedly require learning, training, and development. Instead, they learn their new roles within the school, in its frameworks and through more experienced faculty members or with the help of outside instruction that comes into the school. Sometimes, most likely, they simply learn on their own, from their own experience (Kfir et al., 2008).
Problem Statement
There are issues and dilemmas that occupy the alternative frameworks due to the special needs of the students, vis-à-vis the education system, vis-à-vis industry but also vis-à-vis the teachers who teach in the system. In these settings, many teachers have difficulty knowing how to teach students so that they can achieve significant academic achievement - that is, break the patterns of covert dropout, which often formed the background for overt dropout. Technology school teachers, most of them, have received their pedagogical training in colleges of education and university programs, and do not have enough tools to work with the weak population studying in these schools. In addition, all alternative schools employ professional teachers, or professional counselors whose training in the field of education and care for adolescents with adjustment problems is usually even more limited. This group of educators also needs help and tools in dealing with the needs of the population. In general, most staff members need training and counseling in dealing with the difficulties of adolescents emotionally and socially and with the difficulties they experience in relationships with their parents and family members (Cohen-Navot et al., 2001)
Research Questions
What are the pedagogical and emotional issues of teachers trained for mainstream education working with at-risk and socially excluded youths in high school in Israel?
Purpose of the Study
This study will identify the pedagogical challenges and emotional issues of teachers trained for mainstream education working with at-risk and socially excluded youths in high schools in Israel;
Research Methods
This research will include the qualitative research method, with its research approach being interpretively naturalistic. This approach allows the researcher to examine people's experiences from their personal stories and thus to understand or interpret a phenomenon in terms of the meanings people bring (Denzin & Lincoln, 2008). This study will deal with the production of information from the population of teachers who have been trained in mainstream education who work with at-risk and socially excluded boys in the Israel High School of Technology, in order to understand their pedagogical challenges and emotional issues. This information will be based on semi-structured interviews.
Research population and sampling
This study was conducted in the winter of 2019-2020, which included a population of teachers working with at-risk youth at a technological high school in northern Israel. The data in this case perished from 17 teachers, aged 31-60, 12 female teachers and 5 male teachers. Their professional experience in teaching ranges from 4 to 23 years, in various fields of specialization. 15 teachers were trained for mainstream education and only two teachers were trained to work with at-risk youth.
The sampling method in this study was a homogeneous purposive sampling, with the participants selected at the discretion of the researcher and having a common set of dimensions. This sample best represents the study population, which can provide in-depth information and knowledge about the phenomenon under study, based on good expression, willingness to answer questions and share experiences and experiences (Shkedi, 2012).
Research Tools
The study conducted an in-depth semi-structured interview, in order to identify the pedagogical challenges and emotional issues of teachers trained for mainstream education working with at-risk youth in high schools in Israel. A semi-structured in-depth interview contributes to the researcher in understanding and interpreting the phenomenon being studied through in-depth discourse and generalization from individual states to general.
The semi-structured in-depth interview included 19 pre-formulated neutral questions, with the sequence of presentation not a priori and during the interview the researcher added questions based on the context and need of the interviewee’s answers. The questions contributed to a relationship based on basic trust with the interviewee, for honest answers, while maintaining the validity and credibility of the study. The interview questions addressed a variety of topics presented in the questionnaire such as teacher perception and teacher education, vocational training, emotional issues and coping, pedagogical challenges and coping with them, making contact with the learner and contributing, student support and system professional.
The referral to the participants was done in their workplace, a personal conversation was held with them in which the purpose of the interview was explained, the confidentiality was maintained and their desire to participate in the study was expressed. A personal meeting was scheduled with each participant, with each interview lasting 40-60 minutes in Hebrew. To ensure reliability and accuracy of the study, immediately after conducting the interviews, they were fully documented and even included citation of interruptions and non-verbal responses (Creswell, 1998) to maintain confidentiality, all recordings were numbered without identifying details and participants were given a fake name to disguise their identities.
Data Analysis method
The process of analyzing the data in a qualitative study is done by arranging and constructing the information collected by sorting the data into sections and regrouping them in a meaningful order that allows for interpretation (Shkedi, 2003; 2012).
Interview analysis began only after proficiency in materials read several times by the researcher, adding notes to help identify codes that emerged from the text (Strauss & Corbin, 1990) and encoding data and reaching valid and reliable conclusions (Patton, 1990; Rosenblatt & Fischer, 1993).
Next, an analysis of all the interviews was performed in order to identify topics that could be generalized, using quotes from interviews to anchor the conclusions. Interview analysis was done in two stages. In the first stage the text was coded deductively through a conceptual analysis, which included the collection of words and sentences expressing teachers' pedagogical challenges and emotional issues, and in the second stage an inductive analysis was conducted that focused on constructing categories that emerged from the interviews.
Findings
This study examined the pedagogical challenges and emotional issues of teachers trained for mainstream education working with at-risk and socially excluded youth in high school in Israel. The personal story of the teachers, came up in the analysis of the interviews and described their personal challenges in teaching work with this population, with the educational staff and the education system. The analysis of the content made from the data, raised 2 main themes: 1. Pedagogical challenges. 2. The emotional issues they face.
Pedagogical challenges
Teachers trained in mainstream education working with at-risk and socially excluded youth in high school in Israel have pointed to many pedagogical challenges on a variety of topics.
Teachers in education settings for at-risk youth are dedicated educators who make every effort to help these students, most of whom lack training and systematic professional support (Cohen-Navot et al., 2001). Students in exclusion and at-risk experience persistent failure, severe behavioral problems, feel alienated from school, often absent, involved in violence or delinquency and as a result, their teachers find it difficult to help them, accumulate failures and low ability due to lack of professional coordination between population needs and goals (Razer, 2009)
Emotional issues
Many emotions are involved in teacher work. A content analysis of the data that emerged in the study showed that general education teachers working with at-risk youth indicated many emotional issues in their work.
-
Conclusion
The essence of the teaching profession is characterized by constant confrontation with a sequence of value and educational challenges, and with an emphasis on working with special populations. The meaning of choosing teaching as a profession is to express a willingness to invest a lot, to persevere and to fight tirelessly - even if the road to success is, at times, long and includes failures. Accompaniment of teachers for at-risk youth through a support system and in addition to the support system at the Colt School, contributes significantly to the process of their coping and integration into a system designed for at-risk populations. The support of experienced teachers and especially the professional changes during their careers, contributes to their professional development and their positive professional image. At each stage of his professional development, beyond the professional assistance, it is extremely important to listen to the teacher's troubles as well as his successes, and to give him the emotional support he needs. It is important that this emotional response be given within the system by a professional team. It is also important to oblige every teacher, throughout their professional career, to develop professionally through courses or advanced training relevant to his or her professional advancement. These studies will contribute to their development and professional status: to raising the quality of their professional functioning, their satisfaction and professional image - as well as to raising their status in the public, and at the same time will contribute to preventing or postponing their erosion. There is no doubt that systemic guidance and support in school and professional development, contribute to all the circles involved in education, the system, the staff, the individual teacher and especially the student's success.
References
- Abdor, S. (2008). Professional development of teachers and the place of academic training institutions as partners in these processes - a review of literature and research findings from around the world and from Israel. Mofet Institute - Inter-College Research Authority. [Hebrew]
- Cohen-Navot, M., Ellenbogen-Perkovitz, S., & Reinfeld, T. (2001). Open and Covert Dropout among Youth - Research Report. JDC-Brookdale Institute and the Knesset. [Hebrew]
- Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Sage.
- Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2008). The landscape of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.
- Donmoyer, R., & Kos, R. (1993). At-Risk Students: Insights from/about Research. In R. Donmoyer, & R. Kos (Eds.), At-Risk Students: Portraits, Policies, Programs and Practices (pp. 7- 36). State University of New York Press.
- Etzion, D. (1983). Human burnout - theory and research at a crossroads. Tel Aviv University, Faculty of Management. [Hebrew]
- Friedman, Y., & Lotan, A. (1993). Stress and burnout in teaching - factors and prevention methods. Henrietta Szold Institute. [Hebrew]
- Ginat. (2011). The laws of emotion are overt and covert. "Ed Ahinouch", 1, 42-45. [Hebrew]
- Hargreaves, A. (2000). Mixed emotions: Teachers' perceptions of their interactions with students. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16(8), 811–826.
- Kelchtermans, G. (2011). Vulnerability in Teaching: The Moral and Political Understanding of Teacher’s Work: Professional Learning and Development in Schools and Higher Education (pp. 65-82). Springer.
- Kfir, D., Abdur, S., Reingold, R., & Heishrik, M. (2008). Initial training and professional development of teachers - continuous and ongoing process model. [Hebrew]
- Maagan, D. (2017). An integrative model for explaining absences, internal mobility and leaving the system among teachers in Israel. (Thesis for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy). Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan. [Hebrew]
- Maslach, C., Schaufeli, W. B., & Leiter, M. P. (2001). Job burnout. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 397-422.
- Ministry of Labor, Welfare and Social Services in Israel. (2018). Children and Youth at Risk. https://www.molsa.gov.il/Populations/Youth/ChildrenAtRisk/Pages/MT01_01.aspx [Hebrew]
- Nias, J. (1999). Teachers' moral purposes: Stress, vulnerability, and strength. In R. Vandenberghe, & A. M. Huberman (Eds.), Understanding and preventing teacher burnout: A sourcebook of international research and practice (pp. 223–237). Cambridge University Press.
- Oplatka, J. (2011). Service Providers or Educators. Ed Ahinuh, 86, 46-49. [in Hebrew]
- Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.
- Ministry of Education, State of Israel. (2020). Pedagogical Director, Division A, Education and Children and Youth at Risk. https://cms.education.gov.il/EducationCMS/Units/YeledNoarBesikun/ machlakot/batey_sefer_misgarot/meyuchadot.htm
- Pines, A. M., Aronson, E., & Kafry, D. (1981). Burnout: From Tedium to Personal Growth. The Free Press.
- Razer, M. (2009). "Lo Notshim" (Hebrew) - a dynamic model for training teachers to work with students at risk and social exclusion within the framework of the school. Social Education Work Session (29). (Special issue on educational-therapeutic work with youth at risk and in distress, pp. 59-77). [Hebrew]
- Richman, J. M., & Bowen, G. L. (1997). School Failure: An Ecological-Interventional-Developmental Perspective. In M. W. Fraser (Ed.), Risk and Resilience in Childhood (pp. 95-116). NASW Press.
- Rosenblatt, P. C., & Fischer, L. R. (1993). Qualitative family research. In P. G. Boss, W. J. Doherty, R. LaRossa, W. R. Schumm, & S. K. Steinmetz (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theories and methods: A contextual approach (pp. 167-177). Plenum.
- Schmid, H. (2006). Definition of risk and distress. Report of the public committee for the examination of the situation of at-risk and socially excluded children and youth. [Hebrew]
- Shkedi, A. (2003). Words that Try to Touch - Qualitative Research, Theory and Application. Ramot [Hebrew]
- Shkedi, A. (2012). The meaning behind the words: Methodology in qualitative research - in practice. Ramot Press, Tel Aviv University. [Hebrew]
- Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. M. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Sage Publications, Inc.
- Tzur, S. (2001). The burnout of teachers in special education schools in which students are involved Mentally retarded, and students with behavioral problems. Final thesis submitted as partial fulfillment of the requirements for an A.M. in Educational Leadership for the School of Education. University of Alabama.
- World Labor Organization. (n.d.). Retrieved on August 1, 2020, from https://www.ilo.org/global/lang--en/index.htm
Copyright information
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
About this article
Publication Date
31 March 2021
Article Doi
eBook ISBN
978-1-80296-103-4
Publisher
European Publisher
Volume
104
Print ISBN (optional)
-
Edition Number
1st Edition
Pages
1-536
Subjects
Education, teacher, digital education, teacher education, childhood education, COVID-19, pandemic
Cite this article as:
Zikry, F., & Ceobanu, C. (2021). Risk Circuits In Israel's Youth At-Risk Education System. In I. Albulescu, & N. Stan (Eds.), Education, Reflection, Development – ERD 2020, vol 104. European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences (pp. 415-425). European Publisher. https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2021.03.02.42