| Score |
Estimated position of a term paper |
| Project |
Interview |
| Quality of preparation and forming of main sections of the project’s explanation note |
Degree of an author’s contribution into conclusions and recommendations based on project results forming |
Degree of studying goals received by a student and realization of studying objects |
Level of professional competence mastering demonstrated during the interview |
| from 30 to 40 |
Statistical indicators are calculated, graphic material is formed, analysis is demonstrated, conclusions are formed, explanation note is made according to standard requirements textually and electronically. |
Conclusions are competent and reasonable, the quantity of reference lists is sufficient, and there is no doubt in its actuality, singularity level after a plagiarism checking is more than 80 %. |
During the questions answering a student demonstrated good knowledge about the conceptual discipline set, all statistical indicators are methodologically correct calculated. |
During the questions answering a student demonstrated very good ability to gather, to analyze and process statistical data, to interpret the main, and to predict social and economic indicators changing. |
| from 20 to 30 |
The same, but the analysis is not shown. |
The same, but a singularity level after a plagiarism checking is 75–80 %. |
The same, but only more than 75 % of statistical indicators are methodologically correct calculated. |
The same, but during the questions answering a student demonstrated sufficient ability to gather, to analyze and process statistical data, to interpret the main, and to predict social and economic indicators changing. |
| From 10 to 20 |
The same, but the analysis is not shown, the explanatory note is made with some standard requirements breaches. |
The same, but conclusions are not competent enough; there is a doubt in reference list actuality, a singularity level after a plagiarism checking is 70–75 %. |
The same, but a student did not demonstrate a good knowledge about the conceptual discipline set, more than 50 % of statistical indicators are methodologically correct calculated. |
The same, but during the questions answering a student demonstrated bad ability to gather, to analyze and process statistical data, to interpret the main, and to predict social and economic indicators changing. |
| From 0 to 10 |
The same, but the analysis is not shown, conclusions are not formulated, the explanatory note is made with gross standard requirements breaches. |
The same but there are no conclusions or they are not competent enough, there is a doubt in reference list actuality, a singularity level after a plagiarism checking is less than 70 %. |
The same, but a student did not demonstrate a good knowledge about the conceptual discipline set, less than 50 % of statistical indicators are methodologically correct calculated. |
The same, but during the questions answering a student did not demonstrate an ability to gather, to analyze and process statistical data, to interpret the main and to predict social and economic indicators changing. |
