European Proceedings Logo

Systematic Approach And Student Competencies Formation When Studying Statistics

Table 2:

Score Calculation and graphic work Interview
from 0,75 to 1,00 The work corresponds to a learning object. Its content corresponds to a given task, a work's report formed according to the University STO PGU 3.12-2018 standard (after this a standard) requirements, the report has a sufficient size, logically and informatively completed, has the necessary quantity of reference lists. There is no doubt in its actuality, statistic indicators are calculated, tables are filled, graphs are drawn, analysis is shown, conclusions are formed, there are no methodological mistakes or conceptual inaccuracies during the demonstration of completed calculations. A student answered all questions during the interview in detail, at the same time he demonstrated competent and scientific material description, deep understanding of the issue, his answers were corroborated with practical examples, during the answer a student demonstrated sufficient knowledge of lecture and additional material about the discussed object.
from 0,50 to 0,75 The same, except little methodological mistakes and conceptual inaccuracies which were found during the demonstration of completed calculations. The same, but a student did not corroborate answers with practical examples and also did not demonstrate knowledge of additional material about the discussed object.
from 0,25 to 0,50 The same, but there is some doubt about reference lists actuality, and also bad methodological mistakes and conceptual inaccuracies were found during the demonstration of completed calculations. The same, but a student answered not all questions, during the answering demonstrated surface knowledge of lecture material about the discussed object.
from 0,00 to 0,25 The same, but the work content does not correspond to a given task, a work's report did not form according to standard requirements, the report size is not sufficient, logically and informatively not completed, there is some doubt about reference lists actuality and also bad methodological mistakes and conceptual inaccuracies was found during the demonstration of completed calculations. The same, but a student did not answer most of the questions, during the answering demonstrated surface knowledge of lecture material about the discussed object.
< Back to article