The profitability management of companies is becoming a main task for all management levels: operational, tactical and strategic. The way to control the assets return through the decomposition of the return on assets factor into factors reflecting various aspects of a company is proposed in this article. This article consolidates the information in the sphere of the theory of economic analysis, mastering skills of application of modeling methods of factor systems, the assessment of the impact of quantitative and qualitative factors on the indicators which characterize the final results of economic entities activity. The Filatov model (Return on assets model) allows determining due to what factors the change in profitability occurs or how to perform the analysis of profitability. The transformed methods of factor analysis given in this article compared to the most common traditional methods allow reducing the labor intensity of particular iterations by entering the author's comparative coefficients. The Filatov model analysis (model of return on assets) and the use of the proposed methods of factor analysis for the specialists in the sphere of Economics and management will make the contribution to their base for the development of economic thinking, realization of the essence of economic processes and phenomena which occur within the activities of economic enterprises. However, the most important thing is the development of skills of quantitative assessment as well as economic interpretation along with the search for reserves in order to improve the efficiency of functioning.
Keywords: Factor analysiscompetitivenessROAROE
First of all the economic analysis is necessary in order to foresee and predict the development of economic situation and make rational (on scientific grounds) management decisions. The main tool in the comprehensive analysis of economic enterprises’ activity is factor analysis (Ansoff, 2010; Babicheva, 2012; Yakushev, 2014).
The main task of factor analysis is the study of internal causes influencing the investigated phenomenon. (Kogdenko, 2017; Kogdenko, 2019; Lyubushin & Kondrat'ev, 2017).
In the management system of various aspects of the activities of any company in modern conditions, the most difficult and responsible link is to ensure its financial stability. In order to ensure the effective functioning of companies in the long term, the role and importance of quality management decisions is increasing.
An increase in the value of return on assets increases the financial stability of an economic entity. The higher the ratio (ROA), the more profitable and competitive the company is.
The profitability ratios show the company profitability and the increase in its value to shareholders. A necessary tool for managing the company's finances is a clear understanding of the relationship of all factors affecting the overall level of its financial condition. Therefore, the research topic of this scientific work is extremely relevant.
The proposed three-factor model allows determining the impact of three factors, respectively (the return on equity, the coefficient of income coverage by equity and asset turnover) on the change in return on assets.
One of the main indicators of financial profitability is return on equity (ROE). Return on equity is, in fact, the main indicator for strategic investors. The indicator determines the efficiency of the use of capital invested by the owners of the enterprise.
The equity Income Coverage Ratio (EICR) introduced by the author is the inverse of the return on equity (Yield On Equity – YOE). The return on equity indicator (YOE) introduced by the author characterizes the
The equity income coverage ratio (EICR) gives an idea of how much sales revenue is provided by equity.
The ratio of asset turnover illustrates the efficiency of a company the resources of which it uses to produce products, showing how much revenue from sales of products falls on one investment monetary unit in the assets of a company.
The ratio of asset turnover shows the efficiency of the use of all available resources of a company, despite the sources of their attraction (Arbatskaya, 2012; Barinov & Sinel'nikov, 2000; Vojcekhovskaya, 2005). Turnover ratios are indicators of business activity of the company.
Purpose of the Study
In the author's model (Filatov's model): return on equity characterizes investment activity; return on equity coverage ratio characterizes financial activity; asset turnover characterizes operating activity.
The research purpose is to study the three-factor model of return on assets using the proposed methods of factor analysis.
The research object is construction companies (the construction of residential and non-residential buildings) of Irkutsk region of Russia.
The sources of data base on financial indicators of construction companies of Irkutsk region were presented by financial statements in accordance with Russian accounting standards: Balance sheet, December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2018; Financial results report for 2017 and 2018 (IS «BIR-Analyst», 2019).
where: * 0 – the planned 2017; ** I – actual year 2018; ***
Next, we derive the initial formula of factor analysis, which has the following form (formula 1):
The balance of deviation is presented below (formula 2):
Next, we study 10 methods of deterministic factor analysis proposed by the author.
The assets return of the construction industry of Irkutsk region in 2018 compared to 2017 increased by almost 1 % (0.87 %) from 1.46 to 2.33 %.
The Filatov three-factor model shows the impact on the return on assets of investment of a company and business activity (financial and operating activities). Thus, the return on total capital (assets) of a company directly determines both the general profitability and attractiveness of investment.
The return on assets according to the Filatov model depends on 3 factors: the level of equity return, income coverage with owns funds and asset turnover speed. Therefore, the directions of the increase in the return on assets are determined.
Deterministic modeling of the systems of factor is the basis to quantify the role of each factor in changing the performance indicator (Meredith & Mantel, 2003; Sydsæter & Hammond, 2002; Thompson, William, & Strickland, 1990). This analysis is extremely relevant for practical application in market relations due to the fact that factor deterministic analysis is aimed at the identification of the impact of factors on the value of the effective indicator of the excluding error of interest (Biglova, 2017; Certo, 2003; Heizer, 2004). The author presented in this study the transformed methods of factor analysis compared to the most common traditional methods which can reduce the complexity of several particular iterations by entering the comparative coefficients proposed by the author.
The Filatov model is the essential indicator of the investment and business activities of a company and the assessment of its overall competitiveness.
The article is carried as a part of the scientific project of the Siberian branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences No. XI.174.1.4 «Activation of internal potential of development of regions of resource specialization (on the example of the Baikal region)».
- Ansoff, I. (2010). Strategic management: St. Petersburg: Peter.
- Arbatskaya, E. A. (2012). Approaches to assessing the competitiveness of the enterprise. Bulletin of Irkutsk state academy of economics 1, 118–121.
- Babicheva, N. E. (2012). Theoretical and methodological bases of the economic analysis of development of the organizations on the basis of the resource approach. Moscow: Finance and credit.
- Barinov, V. A., & Sinel'nikov, A. V. (2000). Development of the organization in a competitive environment. Manageement in Russia and abroad, 6, 3–13.
- Biglova, A. A. (2017). Factors affecting financial results. Economy, 58, 26–30.
- Certo, S. C. (2003). Modern management. Prentice Hall.
- Filatov, E. A. (2018). Deterministic factor analysis of three-factor DuPont model using Filatov methods. RPTSS, 45, 364–372. https:// doi.org/
- Heizer, J. (2004). Principles of operations management. Prentice Hall.
- Kogdenko, V. G. (2017). Economic analysis. Analysis of integrated reporting. Moscow: UNITY-DANA.
- Kogdenko, V. G. (2019). Predictive (predictive) and prescriptive (prescriptive) analysis: theoretical aspects. Econ. anal.: theory and pract., 18(7(490)), 1243–1255.
- Lyubushin, N. P., & Kondrat'ev, R. Yu. (2017). Modern concepts and approaches in economic analysis of borrowers ' creditworthiness. Financial analytics: problem and solution, 10(12), 1324–1345.
- Meredith, J. R., & Mantel, S. J. (2003). Project management: a managerial approach. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
- Sydsæter, K., & Hammond, P. (2002). Essential mathematics for economic analysis. Prentice Hall, 684 p.
- Thompson, A. A., William, E. F., & Strickland, A. J. III. (1990). Readings in strategic management. Richard D. IRWIN, Inc.
- Vojcekhovskaya, I. A. (2005). Problems of competitiveness in the modern economy. Problem of modern economy, 1, 107–111.
- Yakushev, A. A. (2014). Methodology of assessment of competitiveness management: theory and practice. Proceedings. of the Irkutsk state econmy academy 4(96), 153–161.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
About this article
07 December 2020
Print ISBN (optional)
Management, human resources, resource efficiency, investment, infrastructure, research and development
Cite this article as:
Filatov, E. A. (2020). Factor Analysis Of Roa Of The Construction Industry Of Irkutsk Region. In A. S. Nechaev, V. I. Bunkovsky, G. M. Beregova, P. A. Lontsikh, & A. S. Bovkun (Eds.), Trends and Innovations in Economic Studies, Science on Baikal Session, vol 96. European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences (pp. 236-242). European Publisher. https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2020.12.31