Crt. no. |
Indicators |
Frequency scale (%) |
Very good |
Good |
Sufficient |
Insufficient |
1. |
Appropriate use of the specific inclusive education terminology |
68,48 |
31,52 |
0 |
0 |
2. |
The knowledge of the specificity, etiology and symptomatology of the different categories of deficiencies |
61,95 |
25 |
13,05 |
0 |
3. |
Observing the conditions of the curricular design specific to inclusion |
55.44 |
29.35 |
15.21 |
0 |
4. |
The knowledge of the principles specific to inclusive education |
79.34 |
20.66 |
0 |
0 |
5. |
The adaptation of theory to concrete cases |
66.32 |
25 |
9.78 |
0 |
6. |
Providing conclusive, relevant examples |
56.53 |
30.43 |
13.04 |
0 |
7. |
Exploiting the psycho-pedagogical theories to explain concrete cases or situations |
60.86 |
27.18 |
11.96 |
0 |
8. |
The validity of the achieved intervention plan |
53.26 |
29.34 |
17.40 |
0 |
9. |
The ability of critical analysis, differentiation, generalization |
55.44 |
26.08 |
17.39 |
1.09 |
10. |
The possibility of argumentation, counter- argumentation |
46.74 |
30.44 |
20.65 |
2.17 |
11. |
Observing the stages of presentation and analysis of a case |
70.65 |
23.91 |
4.35 |
1.09 |
12. |
The ability to personalize the teaching process according to the type of deficiency |
51.09 |
28.26 |
19.56 |
1.09 |
13. |
The originality of approaching the training situations specific to an inclusive class |
55.43 |
33.70 |
9.78 |
1.09 |
14. |
The manifestation of a proactive attitude towards integrated children |
85.87 |
14.3 |
0 |
0 |
15. |
The organization and proper structuring of the portfolio |
86.96 |
10.87 |
2.17 |
0 |