European Proceedings Logo

The Competences To Explore, Present And Represent The Urban Space

Table 1:

The analysed aspect Assessment criteria Score (1-5)
Structure C1 Adequacy with the titleC2 Coherence of the paper 5
Research motivation C3 Clarity of presentation of the research problemC4 Argumentation of the research 5
Theoretical substantiation C5 Relevance of cited sources and information presentedC6 Timeliness of the sourcesC7 Completeness of the sources 4
Research methodology C8 Presentation of the time, participants, material researchC9 Description of the using of methods and toolsC10 Presentation of research design 5
Research results C11 Presentation in the text (essential aspects, details, systematization, coherence) 5
C12 Representing the results on the map (content, correctness of execution, thematic coverage of the subject, relevance) 5
C13 Representing the results on charts (content, relevance, correctness of execution) 5
C14 Presentation of the space in photographs (content, clarity, relevance) 5
Discussions C15 Situation in space (spatial relationships, city-district relationship, relationship with environmental components, etc.) 5
C16 Situation in time (evolution of the city and district) 5
C17 Geographic characterization of the studied area 5
C18 Urban development of the studied area 5
C19 Characterization of each element (TRU) 5
C20 Highlighting strengths and opportunitiesC21 Highlighting dysfunctions/ weaknesses/ threats 4
C22 Presenting measures/solution, proposals in order to eliminate the problems/ dysfunctions/ weaknesses/ threats/dangers and to optimize the functionality of the district 4
Conclusions C23 Synthesis, highlighting features and site specificity 3
Writing the scientific paper C24 Respecting the structure of a scientific paper (title, introduction, theoretical foundation, method, results, discussions, conclusions, bibliography) 2
C25 Respecting the requirements of a scientific paper (quoting sources, scientific language, systematization / organization, correctness and relevance of information, depth / coverage of details, composition of the bibliography) 5
C26 Frame and aesthetics of the paper 5
Total 87
Mean 4.57
< Back to article

We care about your privacy

We use cookies or similar technologies to access personal data, including page visits and your IP address. We use this information about you, your devices and your online interactions with us to provide, analyse and improve our services. This may include personalising content or advertising for you. You can find out more in our privacy policy and cookie policy and manage the choices available to you at any time by going to ‘Privacy settings’ at the bottom of any page.

Manage My Preferences

You have control over your personal data. For more detailed information about your personal data, please see our Privacy Policy and Cookie Policy.

These cookies are essential in order to enable you to move around the site and use its features, such as accessing secure areas of the site. Without these cookies, services you have asked for cannot be provided.

Third-party advertising and social media cookies are used to
(1) deliver advertisements more relevant to you and your interests;
(2) limit the number of times you see an advertisement;
(3) help measure the effectiveness of the advertising campaign; and
(4) understand people’s behavior after they view an advertisement.
They remember that you have visited a site and quite often they will be linked to site functionality provided by the other organization. This may impact the content and messages you see on other websites you visit.