Item |
F1 |
F2 |
F3 |
F4 |
F5 |
16. Professional training...should be made available to teachers and staff… |
.757 |
|
|
|
|
12. The school should have a mental health consultant |
.699 |
|
|
|
|
15. The school should create relationships of trust (school, family, community) |
.696 |
|
|
|
|
17. Schools with protocols to help students at risk of suicide after suicide |
.678 |
|
|
|
|
13. The first step may be with a specialist... |
.525 |
|
|
|
|
10. The first official step is to appoint a crisis team …. |
.446 |
|
|
|
|
18. What is your degree of confidence in your ability …? |
|
.897 |
|
|
|
19. How prepared are you to identify a student at risk for suicide? |
|
.888 |
|
|
|
20. How prepared are you to refer a student at risk of suicide? |
|
.872 |
|
|
|
11. Zero tolerance policies in schools are the competence of school community. |
|
|
.603 |
|
|
4. A competent school community focuses on developing internal resources for students |
|
|
.570 |
|
|
7. Providing parents with information about mental health resources and checklists may constitute a violation of rights |
|
|
.554 |
|
|
6. Teachers are already overwhelmed ... A crisis team takes full responsibility for at-risk students. |
|
|
.515 |
|
|
14. Educators need details about the student's personal and emotional history before making a referral to the school's mental health resources. |
|
|
.501 |
|
|
2. Suicidal ideation is not a problem for the teacher as it does not affect the student's ability to concentrate and learn in the classroom. |
|
|
.499 |
|
|
1. The educator/teacher needs to be able to assess, diagnose and treat adolescents at risk of suicide. |
|
|
|
.740 |
|
3. If a school has a suicide prevention policy it is considered competent school. |
|
|
|
.583 |
|
5. Crisis teams in schools should include community members, and school officials. |
|
|
|
.537 |
|
8. It is important to turn to a confidant from your peers. |
|
|
|
|
.807 |
9. The most effective school communications are those that are appealing |
|
|
|
|
.564 |
Explained variation (%) |
18.9% |
11.7% |
10.6% |
6.3% |
5.2% |
Total explained variation (%) |
51.9% |
|
|
|
|
Cronbach Alpha (by dimension) |
.74 |
.86 |
.57 |
.51 |
.35 |
Cronbach Alpha (general) |
.67 |
|
|
|
|