The purpose of this study is to identify the learning style and it relationship with student engagement. Many reveal that static in existing learning style or not willing to adopt others learning style has become one of the reasons for decreasing students’ engagement. To increase student engagement, instructor must identify first the needs of student, then proceed with match the student learning style and instructor’s delivery method. The Visual-Auditory-Kinaesthetic (VAK) is selected due to present purposes; VAK is the simplest learning style. The findings from this research may provide valuable insight in suiting or matching the best learning styles with the study environment, then help to increase the level of student engagement and, hence improve students’ academic performance. The objective of this study is to identify the relationship between VAK learning styles and student engagement, and 2) to recognize the learning styles that preferred among business student in private university. Data were collected from respondent by using the questionnaire method. The data was tested for its construct reliability and correlation was conducted to test the hypothesis. The findings show that Visual learning style has stronger relationship with student engagement.
Keywords: VAKlearning stylestudent engagementprivate universityMalaysia
Student engagement reflects student motivation towards their learning process (Skinner & Belmont, 1993). In previous literature, student engagement able to improve students’ achievements ( Klem & Connell, 2004). This scenario telling that it is crucial for higher institution to have high level of student engagement.
Learning style plays a major role in attracting or stimulating students engagement; it might help the students to improve their study achievement. (Bryson & Hand, 2007). The success of students’ learning style depends on how well the students adapt and respond to the learning environment (MacKeracher, 2004). In view of instructor, they are advised to utilize a dynamic learning instructing in order to obtain the best result (McLaughin et al., 2014). This paper uses VAK learning style. VAK is a well-known learning style theory and is accepted globally due to its benefits in all levels of learning and training (Gholami & Bagheri, 2013). VAK learning styles include Visual, Auditory, and Kinaesthetic. Oxford (1995) outlined that Visual learning style associates to eye-related behaviour such as 1) reading books, any written manuscripts, or 2) watching visual channels including videos. He also referred Auditory as an individual that engage with oral-related activities. Those individuals are more attractive to discussion session, enjoy to participate in conversation and work group. Kinsella (1995) highlighted that Kinaesthetic learning style are involve with physical movement. For example, a field trip visit, where in this event, the learners are required to do some actions such as do interview, do some observations and make report. It can be said that Kinaesthetic learner focuses on hands on learning style.
Many higher institution faced a problem related to student engagement (Taylor & Parsons, 2011). In addition, some scholars in pedagogical reveal that the lower the student engage in a classroom, the lesser the impact of student achievement in class. It shows that voluntarily participation in class is highly needed (Dasari, 2009; Zainal Abidin Sayadin, 2007; Tani, 2005); the instructor/ teacher or lecturer needs to play a smart role in gaining students’ participations in class. In recent years, disengagement between students and learning activities in the class has become an issue within Malaysia context (Dasari, 2009; Thang & Azarina Alias, 2007; Zainal Abidin Sayadin, 2007). Previous scholars referred this disengagement behaviour as ‘negative passive behaviour’ (Siti Maziha & Nik Suryani, 2011). Siti and Nik highlight that this negative behaviour refers to student that choose to be quiet, avoid from involve in any of class activities, and have no study interest at all. Surprisingly, Lim (2017) also highlights that this negative passive behaviour may due to the teaching style (one way teaching). Again, instructor skill plays a role in suiting students’ need and students’ learning style. Hence, it assists to gain more numbers of student to be engaged in the class as well as the activities within class. Therefore, this paper aims to investigate the relationship between learning style and student engagement in context Malaysia private university in east coast Peninsular Malaysia.
In this paper a research question is developed. This research question is the keystone for this paper. The research question (RQ) is as follow:
This research question is derived to explore on how learning style able to improve the student engagement; the answer from this RQ1, may provide the direction of relationships for each of these VAK learning style. This is important due to identify which of these learning style able to improve student engagement. Furthermore, it is important as well to prove that VAK learning style able to improve student engagement; to support findings in previous literature.
Purpose of the Study
The exploration of VAK learning style within student engagement area may provide some benefits in terms of theoretical and practical perspective. From context of theoretical, it would expand the existing literature and enrich it with various findings pertaining to exercising VAK learning style in stimulating student engagement. Meanwhile, in aspect practical, this paper may suggest to higher institution the best alternative to be practiced in the classroom as a way to improve level of student engagement.
Self-administered survey is used in this research. The survey were distributed to two well-known private universities in east coast Peninsular Malaysia: Pahang. The two universities are DRB Hicom University and Universiti Tenaga Nasional. The respond were received from 342 respondents; 150 from DRB Hicom University and 192 from Universiti Tenaga Nasional. This research uses Pearson Bivariate Correlation due to its focus that is to find the relationship between two variables. The two variables are learning style and student engagement. This Bivariate analysis able to analyse data objectively and systematically, ultimately produce less likely biased and more consistency result. This result able to explain the decision in detail and are generally useful.
In consistent with the findings in literature review, several hypotheses were developed. The hypotheses are as follows:
H1: There is relationships between Visual learning styles and student engagement.
H2: There is relationships between Auditory learning styles and student engagement.
H3: There is relationships between Kinaesthetic learning styles and student engagement.
Findings from this research reveals the analysis on the relationship between Learning Style and Student Engagement. The Correlation Table displays the result of this relationship.
Assessment on relationship between Learning Style and Student Engagement.
In this section, it illustrates the findings on correlation between Learning Style and Student Engagement. Table below shows the detail.
All the hypotheses were supported. All p-values are less than 0.0, indicating that the correlation between all learning styles (Visual, Auditory, Kinaesthetic) and student engagement are highly significant.
In sum, the finding confirms that VAK learning style associates with student engagement. This indicates that VAK might be a tool that can be used in a classroom to transform from the negative passive behaviour to positive active behaviour. If no action taken to shifting from negative to positive behaviour, it may dragging the students generate a pool of passive students.
This present study provides significant note that diversified in teaching skills are needed to enhance student engagement. Following this, the process of identifying students’ needs in aspect of learning outcome need to be considered. This process then is expect to assist higher institution to get a perfect match between teaching skill and learning style. This relationship is essential in generating student engagement.
The present finding reveals that Visual has the strongest relationship with student engagement as compared others. But this relationship alone is not concrete enough in describing that Visual is the most preferred VAK learning style. The lacking in this paper, no further analysis had been done in identifying which of the VAK learning style is most preferred by the student.
In relation with the note mentioned in limitation, this paper suggests that it is important to identify which of the VAK learning style is most preferred by the student.
Alhamdulillah, praise to ALLAH for His blessing and guidance along this project as well as for giving us the chance to do this research. This publication is only with HIS willing and help, Masha Allah. Yet, we would not manage to get this far without the help and assist from many people. First of all, we would like to expressed our greatest gratitude and thank to our supervisor, Noor Awanis Muslim, who give us an opportunity to do this research project and also for all her support, mentoring and guidance. Her high motivation and new ideas always helped us to gain huge knowledge and meaningful experience throughout this project as well as for the completion of our dissertation. We also like to acknowledge with much appreciation the crucial role of the respondent who gave us their precious time and cooperation in helping us throughout the data collection process. Not to forget, our deepest thank you to the librarians in UNITEN for their most support and great help. Without them, maybe it hard for us to finding out our desired and wanted journal. Last but not least, my special appreciation and gratitude goes to our beloved parents, family and friends. Millions of thank you for your precious support, understanding and motivation in helping us completing this project greatly. Final thank you, we would like to express our deepest thank you and appreciation to all who have provided us with the possibility to complete this research paper, even the names are not mentioned here but your existent in our project journey are more than enough. We are so thankful to have all of you in our research milestone. This is the best ever present we received throughout our study life in university. Thank you UNITEN.
- Bryson, C., & Hand, L. (2007). The role of engagement in inspiring teaching and learning. Innovations in education and teaching international, 44(4), 349-362.
- Dasari, B. (2009). Hong Kong students’ approaches to learning: Cross-cultural comparisons. US-China Education Review. 6(12), 46-58Brown, H. D. (2000). Principles of language teaching and learning, (4th ed.). White Plains, NY: Longman.
- Gholami, S., & Bagheri, M. S. (2013). Relationship between VAK learning styles and problem solving styles regarding gender and students’ fields of study. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 4(4), 700-706.
- Kinsella, K. (1995). Understanding and empowering diverse learners in ESL classrooms. In J. M. Reid (Ed.) Learning styles in the ESL/EFL classroom (170-194). New York: Heinle and Heinle Publishers.
- Klem, A. M., & Connell, J. P. (2004). Relationships matter: Linking teacher support to student engagement and achievement. Journal of school health, 74(7), 262-273.
- Lim, W.N (2017). Improving student engagement in higher education through mobile-based interactive teaching model using socrative. Global Engineering Education Conference.
- MacKeracher, D. (2004). Making sense of adult learning, (2nd ed.). Canada: University of Toronto Press Incorporated.
- McLaughlin, J. E., Roth, M. T., Glatt, D. M., Gharkholonarehe, N., Davidson, C. A., Griffin, L. M., ... & Mumper, R. J. (2014). The flipped classroom: a course redesign to foster learning and engagement in a health professions school. Academic Medicine, 89(2), 236-243.
- Oxford, R. L. (1995). Gender differences in language learning styles: What do they mean? In J. M. Reid (ED.).Learning styles in the ESL/EFL classroom (34-46). New York: Heinlr and Heinle Publishers.
- Siti Maziha, M. & Nik Suryani, N.A.R. (2011). Classroom Participation Patterns: A Case Study of Malaysian Undergraduate Students. International Journal for Educational Studies, 3(2), 145-158.
- Skinner, E. A., & Belmont, M. J. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal of educational psychology, 85(4), 571
- Tani, M. (2005). Quiet, but only in class: reviewing the in-class participation of Asian students. Retrieved from Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia Incorporated (HERDSA) website: http://conference.herdsa.org.au/2005/pdf/non_refereed/030.pdf
- Thang, S.M., & Azarina Alias (2007). Investigating readiness for autonomy: A comparison of Malaysian ESL undergraduates of three public universities. Reflections on English Language Teaching, 6(1), 1-18
- Taylor. L., & Parsons, J. “Improving Student Engagement.,” Current Issues Education, 14(1), 1–33, 2011.
- Zainal Abidin Sayadi. (2007). An Investigation into First Year Engineering Students’ Oral Classroom Participation: A Case Study”. Unpublished Master Thesis. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: UTM [Universiti Teknologi Malaysia].
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
About this article
31 July 2018
Print ISBN (optional)
Business, innovation, sustainability, environment, green business, environmental issues, industry, industrial studies
Cite this article as:
Muslim, N. A., Balqis, A. F., Nasyit, M. A., Syuhada, N., Khatijah, S., & Nadhirah, N. (2018). Vak Learning Style And Student Engagement: A Perspective From Malaysia Private University. In N. Nadiah Ahmad, N. Raida Abd Rahman, E. Esa, F. Hanim Abdul Rauf, & W. Farhah (Eds.), Interdisciplinary Sustainability Perspectives: Engaging Enviromental, Cultural, Economic and Social Concerns, vol 44. European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences (pp. 573-577). Future Academy. https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2018.07.02.61