European Proceedings Logo

The Contribution Of Using Geometry Learning Strategies Program In The Learning-Teaching Process

Table 3:

# Reference Country Study Population Disability Age Data collection Analysis year
1 Ang et al Malaysia Heads of integration programs for SE students Learning disabilities Middle-school students National survey Factor analysis 2016
2 Barnard-Brak et al United States Approximately 5000 disabled youths, with and without intellectual disabilities Intellectual disability Youths (average age of 15) Longitudinal quantitative study Chi square 2014
3 Chirawu et al South Africa SE teachers Various disabilities Not mentioned Questionnaires Correlation 2014
4 East et al Canada Disabled adolescents, parents, doctors and teachers Physical disabilities Adolescents Interviews and focus groups Narrative qualitative study 2014
5 Esmail, Darry et al Canada Visibly and non-visibly disabled, caregivers, general public Various visible and non-visible disabilities All ages, primarily adults Interviews and focus groups Narrative qualitative study 2010
6 Kim et al Korea SE and regular education teachers Intellectual disability as well as non-disabled children Elementary school to high school Experimental array, different questionnaires pre & post being manipulated Analysis of variance 2009
7 Löfgren-Mårtenson et al Sweden Youths aged 16-21 Intellectual disability 16-21 Interviews Content analysis 2012
8 McDaniels et al USA Literature Review Intellectual disability Literature Review Literature Review Literature Review 2016
9 Minch USA SE teachers Development disability High-school Mixed methods (quantitative & qualitative) Factor analysis and frequency 2011
10 Manor-Binyamini et al Israel SE school Intellectual disability 12-21 Educational experiment Educational experiment 2013
11 Rohleder South Africa Educators that provide SHE for disabled students Learning disabilities Adolescents and young adults Interviews Narrative qualitative study 2010
12 Schaafsma, Kok et al Netherlands Caregivers Intellectual disability Age 12 and up Online questionnaires correlation 2014
13 Sinclair et al Literature Review Literature Review Developmental or intellectual disability Literature Review Literature Review Literature Review 2015
14 Wilkenfeld et al United States Teachers and guides in a center for adults with learning disabilities Developmental disability Adolescents and young adults Structured interviews Qualitative study, content analysis 2011
< Back to article

We care about your privacy

We use cookies or similar technologies to access personal data, including page visits and your IP address. We use this information about you, your devices and your online interactions with us to provide, analyse and improve our services. This may include personalising content or advertising for you. You can find out more in our privacy policy and cookie policy and manage the choices available to you at any time by going to ‘Privacy settings’ at the bottom of any page.

Manage My Preferences

You have control over your personal data. For more detailed information about your personal data, please see our Privacy Policy and Cookie Policy.

These cookies are essential in order to enable you to move around the site and use its features, such as accessing secure areas of the site. Without these cookies, services you have asked for cannot be provided.

Third-party advertising and social media cookies are used to
(1) deliver advertisements more relevant to you and your interests;
(2) limit the number of times you see an advertisement;
(3) help measure the effectiveness of the advertising campaign; and
(4) understand people’s behavior after they view an advertisement.
They remember that you have visited a site and quite often they will be linked to site functionality provided by the other organization. This may impact the content and messages you see on other websites you visit.