Abstract
Special education teacher education in Israel lasts four years. The program structure is unique to Israel and has two stages:First stage - three years of teacher education. The student-teachers considered as pre-service teachers and engage in both academic studies and teaching practice. Second stage - the fourth year of studies. The student-teachers are at the same time students and teachers. They called interns in their induction year. They differ from interns around the world that are teachers who have completed their academic studies. Special education student-teachers perceive studies, field experience and teaching in special education as stressful as a result of the combination of external pressures and personal expectations. An inner resource that can help them cope with their stressful situations in teaching is Sense of Coherence in Teaching Situations (SOCITS), a resource that was found in earlier research (
Keywords: Special education teacher educationstudent-teacherspre-service teachersinternsinduction yearSOCITS
Introduction
Special education teacher education program in Israel
Special education teacher education programs reflect the complexity and multi-dimensionality of special education. In Israel, this program lasts four years. The program's structure is unique to Israel and has two stages:
The induction year in Israel is perceived as the peak of teacher education. It is impossible to get a teaching license without a successful completion of an induction year. The student-teacher, which receives his or her teaching license, sets off as an independent professional teacher (Raingold, 2009). The focus in the induction year shifts from training in teacher education colleges – the academic field - to the work field – the schools. The theoretical terms, which the student-teacher has learnt, such as long-term planning, assessment methods and more, are no longer theoretical terms, but rather a specific reality the teacher has to define, activate and operate in it (Levinsky College of Education, 2017).
Special education student-teachers' difficulties
Teaching has been characterized as a complex and stressful occupation by its very nature even for experienced teachers (Tuval & Or, 2008; Hillel-Lavian, 2008) and as a result, for student-teachers (pre-service teachers and interns). Being a teacher is stressful across different countries and schoolteachers are among those professionals with the highest levels of job and burnout on the job stress. It is understandable, then, that levels of psychological distress have been reported to be great among student-teachers (Wong et al., 2006 in Gardner, 2010). According to many studies, special education teachers were found to experience more stress and higher levels of burnout than general education teachers (Lazuras, 2006 and Embich, 2001 in Dickerson, 2008).
The special education student-teachers are highly motivated, and most of them have chosen special education for personal reasons and for the realization of a sense of mission. Often, they take up teaching with the intent to change the system and sometimes due to the wish to undergo a remedial experience after having experienced failure in the mainstream education system (Hillel-Lavian, 2009; Ezer, Gilat & Sagee, 2011; Aloni, 2014).
The special education pre-service teachers and the interns attending academic studies, must navigate between being “students” and “teachers”, between academic tasks and their teaching requirements. This process causes difficulties. They report high level of stress with: academic performance; overload school work; challenging behaviour of learners, involvement in classroom situations and more, as the issues contributing most to their levels of stress (Oswalt & Riddock, 2007, Jacobs, 2010). The requirements of pre-service teachers include maintaining a personal and intimate relationship with their pedagogical instructor and the mentor teacher, sharing the planning of the lessons with them, and getting systematic supervision and on-site mentoring; in addition to their other responsibilities and obligations. Interns, as well as pre-service teachers, indicate similar difficulties although their experience differs from the experiences they had as pre-service teachers. The transition from the teacher education college to the new status as an intern, who is a teacher, is usually sharp. The transition occurs in the short time between the end of teacher education and the beginning of work, and psychologically, it is a giant leap (Friedman & Gavish, 2001, Glassford & Geri Salinitri, 2007). This situation requires the interns to cope with a variety of roles in school and succeed at all of them simultaneously. Furthermore, from the beginning of the school year to its end, they are expected to function professionally and abide by all rules and instructions, to perform complex tasks and assume the same responsibility as their veteran colleague (Brownell, et al. 2005; Darling-Hammond, 2010 in Hudson, 2012). In addition, despite their lack of experience, principals are expecting the interns to function effectively as agents of change in the education system (Tat, 2008; Dvir & Schatz-Oppenheimer, 2011).
SOCITS as a personal coping resource
The student-teachers' difficulties mentioned so far, arises the question - what personal resources will enable special education student-teachers (pre-service teachers and interns) to cope with the complex teaching situations?
One of the personal coping resources that can answer this question is the concept SOCITS which is based on previous research of the authors (Bracha & Hoffenbartal, 2015; Bracha & Bocos, 2015). SOCITS was defined following Antonovsky's concept - SOC (1998):
"It defines the extent to which the student-teacher has a sense of confidence in the predictable, familiar teaching situations, and the belief that one can cope so that teaching situations will be managed in the best way. SOCITS has three components: Comprehensibility: (cognitive component) the extent to which the student-teacher perceives teaching situations as cognitively meaningful and predictable. Manageability: (behavioural component) the extent to which the student-teacher perceives the available resources as satisfactory in the attempt to meet the demands placed by both external and internal stimuli in teaching situations' problems. Meaningfulness: (motivational-emotional component): the extent to which the student-teacher feels teaching situations are emotionally meaningful and that at least some of the daily requirements pose more of a challenge than a heavy burden (Bracha and Hoffenbartal, 2015, p.723)".
In a pioneer research, SOCITS was found among student-teachers as a personal coping resource (Bracha & Hoffenbartal, 2015). Another research, among special education pre-service teachers, revealed a primary process of development, of change of SOCITS and its' components, between first and third year of their studies (Hoffenbartal & Bocos, 2015). Regarding interns, SOCITS was found as a buffer and a predictor to interns' burnout (Bracha & Bocos, 2015).
These researches indicate that SOCITS and its components influence the student-teachers.
Since this concept is new, more researches are required to understand it and its' components among different student-teachers population; in different teacher education programs; between different teacher education years and along teachers' professional development etc.
Problem Statement
SOCITS and its' components was found as a personal coping resource that influence the student-teachers. Yet, this concept is new and there is little knowledge about it and changes occurring in it. Furthermore, no comparison was conducted between the years of study (first year, fourth year) therefore; there is no knowledge about the changes in this sense.
Research Questions
The research questions and hypothesis were:
Does SOCITS and its' components, among special education student-teachers, change between first year and fourth year of teacher education?
What are the differences in the manifestations of SOCITS, including all its components, among special education student-teachers in this research?
Purpose of the Study
This research will focus on the special education student-teachers and its' aim is to examine changes of special education student-teachers SOCITS' (Sense of Coherence in Teaching Situations), between first year and fourth year of their studies.
Research Methods
In order to answer the research goal, a mixed methods approach was adopted.
The research participants
The research participants were from a college in the centre of Israel, from two groups: (1) 57 special education first year student-teachers (pre-service teachers). (2) 50 special education fourth year student-teachers (interns) (N=107).
The research tools
-
SOCITS questionnaire (Hoffenbartal & Bracha, 2016).
-
Reflective diaries - the special education pre-service teachers were instructed to write reflections on their teaching practice as a part of their academic duties.
-
Semi-structured interviews - included two kinds of questions: one major open-ended question and focus questions regarding SOCITS and its' components. This tool was chosen because special education interns do not have to write dairies.
Both tools enabled the researchers to deeply understand the SOCITS of the participants, and changes that can occur in it.
Findings
The findings will be presented with regard to the research approach and tools:
Analysis of SOCITS questionnaire - quantitative tool.
Analysis of the participants' statements regarding SOCITS as a global concept and of each of its' components: Comprehensibility, Manageability and Meaningfulness – qualitative tool.
Analysis of SOCITS questionnaire
The research question was - Does SOCITS and its' components, among special education student, teachers, change between first year and fourth year of teacher education?
The analysis yielded that the means of the global score of SOCITS and the means of the three components of SOCITS are higher among special education interns in the fourth year compared to first year special education pre-service teachers, as can be seen in figure

The difference is statistically significant for the global score and approaches significance for manageability as can be seen in table
Analysis of reflective diaries and semi-structured interviews
Two approaches of content analysis were performed: Data driven approach was used for the reflective diaries of first year special education pre-service teachers. The categories that were identified emerged from the data itself, meaning - no pre-determined categories were defined. Driven thematic analysis was used for the semi-structured interview of the special education interns in the fourth year. The categories of the analysis were determined in advance regarding SOCITS and its' components. (Creswell, 2014). The qualitative results constituted another layer in the understanding of the student-teachers' SOCITS, including all its' components. The qualitative research yielded manifestations testifying to explicit differences in SOCITS and its' components between first year special education pre-service teachers and fourth year special education interns, as can be seen in table
Conclusion
The results of this research, that examined the changes in SOCITS and its components, pointed to a change in SOCITS among special education student- teachers, in the comparison between first year and fourth year of teacher education.
SOCITS as a global coping resource
The findings emerging from the questionnaires, personal reflective diaries and personal interviews testified to a significant change in SOCITS' level. The conclusion drawn is that SOCITS changes between the years. Thus, when the special education interns in this study will come across stressful situations in teaching, it will be clear to them that they possess the internal resource to cope with their difficulties. They will feel that they know how to choose the appropriate coping strategy and will be highly motivated to cope more than special education first year pre-service teachers will.
SOCITS' components
This research examined the change of each of SOCITS three components – Comprehensibility, Manageability and Meaningfulness, in the comparison between special education first year and fourth year student-teachers.
It was found that the difference regarding the level of Manageability, of the three components, is statistically approaches significance. It can be concluded that the sense of Manageability in teaching situations changes between the years. Therefore, when the special education interns in this study will be required to cope with difficulties in classroom management, they will feel, more than the special education first year pre-service teachers, that they have the resources to meet the demands in teaching situations and manage them. In contrast to the quantitative results, the qualitative results indicated a change in each of the three components. Meaning – there are changes in the sense of Comprehensibility and Meaningfulness in teaching situations. Thus, when the special education interns in this study will be required to cope with daily teaching situations, they will perceive these requirements as cognitively predictable and meaningful. They will treat them as a challenge more than a heavy burden.
In light of these results, a farther research in different population and along teacher professional development, will expend the understanding of the changes in SOCITS as a coping resource.
References
- Aloni, N. (2014). Meaning in Life: in education. In teaching and in learning.. The Mofet Institute Journal,, 41(5)
- Antonovsky, A. (1998). The salutogenic model as a significant theory in health promotion.. Megamot,, 41
- Bracha, E.Bocos, M. (2015). A Sense of Coherence in Teaching Situations as a Predictor of First Year Teaching Interns’ Burnout. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences,, 41, 180-187
- Bracha, E.Hoffenbartal, D. (2015). The Existence of Sense of Coherence in Teaching Situations Among Student-teachers. Procedia - Social and Behavioural Sciences,, 41, 722-729
- Brownell, M.Ross, D.Colón, E.McCallum, C. (2005). Critical features of special education teacher preparation. A comparison with general teacher education.. Journal of Special Education,, 41(4), 25-242
- Creswell, J.W, . (2014). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches.
- Dickerson, K Y. (2008). Stress and Self-Efficacy of Special Education and General Education Student Teachers During and After the Student Teaching Internship. Dissertation submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy. Retrieved from:, 1969-1, Retrieved from: http://repository.tamu.edu/bitstream/handle/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-2699/DICKERSON-DISSERTATION.pdf?sequence=1 (15.6.2017)
- Dvir, N.Schatz-Oppenheimer, O. (2011). Looking in the mirror: the process of constructing interns' professional identities as reflected in their narratives. In: Schatz-Oppenheimer,
- Ezer, H.Gilat, I.Sagee, R. (2011). am all alone in this story” – Young people Israel cope with stressful situations. Tel Aviv: The MOFET Institute. (In Hebrew).
- Fisherman, S. (2005). School Absorbing the Beginning Teacher. Research Report: Intern's Integration into Teaching. Researchers':, Retrieved from: www.orot.ac.il/M-ed/educational (14.6.2017). (In Hebrew).
- Friedman, . (2001). The novice teacher: the difficulties, the support, and the adjustment. Jerusalem: The Henrietta Szold Institute. (In Hebrew).
- Fulton, K.Yoon, I.Lee, C. (2005). Induction into learning communities. Washington D.C.; National Commission on Teaching and America's Future. Retrieved from:, Retrieved from: http://hub.mspnet.org/index.cfm/11975. (14.6.2017).
- Gardner, S. (2010). Stress Among Prospective Teachers: A Review of the Literature.. Australian Journal of Teacher Education,, 35-8
- Glassford, L A.Salinitri, G. (2007). Designing a successful new teacher induction program: An assessment of the Ontario experience,. 2003-2006. Journal of Educational Administration and Policy,, 60-1
- Lavian, Hillel.R, . (2008). Master Weavers – The complexity of the teachers' role in special education.. Issues in Special Education and Rehabilitation, 41(1)
- Lavian, Hillel.R, . (2009). You and I will change the world - Student teachers’ motives for choosing special education., 41(2)
- Hoffenbartal, D.Bracha, E. (2016). How do pre-service teachers feel? Describing the development of a Sense of Coherence. in Teaching Situations – SOCITS questionnaire.The European Proceedings of Social & Behavioural Sciences EpSBS,18,, Retrieved from: http://www.futureacademy.org.uk/files/images/upload/ERD2016FA026F.pdf (15.6.2017)
- Hoffenbatal, D Bocos.M, . (2015). The Development of a Sense of Coherence. in Teaching Situations among Special Education Pre-service Teachers. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences,, 41, 240-246
- Hudson, P. (2012). How Can Schools Support Beginning Teachers? A Call for Timely Induction and Mentoring for Effective Teaching.. Australian Journal of Teacher Education,, 41(7), Retrieved from: http://dx.doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2012v37n7.1(14.6.2017).
- Jacobs, M. (2010). Teaching Learners with Learning Difficulties in mainstream Primary Schools: the Educators’ Sense of Coherence. Dissertation Submitted in Accordance with the Requirements for the Degree Magister Societies Scientiae. Retrieved from:, 10172011-110958, Retrieved from: http://etd.uovs.ac.za/ETD-db/theses/available/etd-10172011-110958/unrestricted/JacobsM.pdf (15.6.2017).
- Levinsky College of Education, (2017), Retrieved from: http://www.levinsky.ac.il/mini/Education/?cmd=mini.406 (15.6.2017).
- Alhija, Nasser-Abu.Fresco, F.B, .Reichenberg, R. (2011). The Process of Induction – an overview. In: Schatz-Oppenheimenr,
- Oswalt, S B.Riddock, C C. (2007). What to do about being overwhelmed: graduate students, stress and university services.. College Student Affairs Journal,, 41(1), 24-44
- Raingold, R. (2009). The novice teacher and programs for successful absorption.. Panim,, 41, Retrieved from: http://www.itu.org.il/Index.asp?ArticleID=14146&CategoryID=1544&Page=1(14.6.2017)
- Schatz-Oppenheimenr, O.Maskit, D.Zilberstrom, S. (2011). Being a Teacher on the Induction Route. Tel Aviv: Mofet Institute,, 55-
- Shimoni, S.Gonen, C.Yaakobi, T. (2006). Dear Teacher, Would You Like to Continue Teaching Next Year? Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the AERA,
- Strong, M. (2009). Effective Teacher Internship and Mentoring, Assessing the Evidence.
- Tat, H C. (2008). Secondary school principals' expectations of beginning teachers in Hong Kong.. Journal of the International Society for Teacher, 41(1)
- Tuval, S.Or, A. (2006). Inclusion in school – mission impossible? Social representations of inclusion and stratification in the education system.. Issues in Special Education and Rehabilitation,, 41(2), 5-18
Copyright information
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
About this article
Publication Date
28 June 2018
Article Doi
eBook ISBN
978-1-80296-040-2
Publisher
Future Academy
Volume
41
Print ISBN (optional)
-
Edition Number
1st Edition
Pages
1-889
Subjects
Teacher, teacher training, teaching skills, teaching techniques, special education, children with special needs
Cite this article as:
Bracha, E., & Hoffenbartal, D. (2018). Changes In Socits - Sense Of Coherence In Special Education Teaching Situations. In V. Chis, & I. Albulescu (Eds.), Education, Reflection, Development – ERD 2017, vol 41. European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences (pp. 304-312). Future Academy. https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2018.06.37