Adolescence has been characterized as a developmental period sensitive to risky behavior engagement. Previous research suggests that risky behaviors are connected to low academic performance and school dropout. Adolescent Risk-taking Behavior Scale (ARQ-b) (
Keywords: Risk-takingbehavioradolescentslinguistic validation
Risk-taking behavior is defined in various ways in the literature, but is commonly accepted that it refers to engagement in behaviors that are associated with undesired psycho-social outcomes at individual, group or society levels (Irwin, 1993). Moore & Gullone (1996) defined risk-taking as „
Adolescence is described in the literature as a fragile developmental period marked by changes in several domains: biological, cognitive, social and affective (Steinberg, 2005; Choudhury, Blakemore & Charman, 2006). The prevalence of risk-taking behaviors is high in the adolescence years (Arnett, 1992; Irwin, 1993; Gullone, Moore, Moss & Boyd, 2000; Rai et al., 2003). During these years, some of the risk-taking behaviors are considered to be developmentally appropriate and this specific category of behaviors is known in the literature as
Extensive research attempted to identify connections between various external and internal factors and risk-taking behaviors in adolescence. A series of internal factors were linked to risk-taking behavior in adolescence such as biological factors (
The discrepancies in conceptualization and definition of risk-taking behavior led to the development of several measurement instruments and assessment techniques of the variables related to this concept. Some of the available measures were considered less efficient, due to their limitation to a singular type of risk-taking behavior, such as substance use or sexual risky behaviors (Moore & Gullone, 1996). Furthermore, most of the available measures were relying on a list of researcher nominated risk-taking behaviors. This type of measurement approach might not always reflect the state of the phenomenon, due to the fact that adolescents may have a completely different definition of risk-taking behaviors, as opposed to adults (Moore & Gullone, 1996). In order to address the above mentioned measurement-related issues, Gullone, Moore, Moss & Boyd (2000) developed the Adolescent Risk-taking Questionnaire (ARQ), using a contrasting focus compared to previous approaches (which were directed from researcher towards the targeted group) (Moore & Gullone, 1996; Gullone, Moore, Moss & Boyd, 2000). Hence, the development of ARQ was initiated based on the reports of a large sample of adolescents, in which they were asked to nominate up to four behaviors considered risky by them (Gullone, Moore, Moss & Boyd, 2000). Subsequently, a series of procedural steps followed and the questionnaire was revised in order to obtain the final version (for details see Gullone, Moore, Moss & Boyd, 2000).
ARQ (Gullone, Moore, Moss & Boyd, 2000) is a self-reporting measure, developed to assess risk-taking behavior in adolescence and it delivers a comprehensive bidimensional insight on: (a) risk-behavior engegement and (b) adolescent perceptions of riskiness regarding specific behaviors. The questionnaire comprises two distinct scales, each measuring one of the above mentioned dimensions of risk-behavior in adolescence. The scales can be used and interpreted separately. ARQ encompasses four subscales, each assesing a specific category of risk-behavior (Gullone, Moore, Moss & Boyd, 2000): (1) thrill-seeking behavior (
Taking into account that at the time the present research was conducted, we did not succeed to identify scientifically validated measures of risk-taking behavior, linguistically appropriate for the Romanian adolescent population, there was a need to deliver such instruments, in order to facilitate the measurement of risk-taking engagement and the associated variables, in a Romanian sample.
The process of linguistic validation of ARQ - Behavior scale (ARQ-b) (Gullone, Moore, Moss & Boyd, 2000) was guided by the following research questions:
Is the Romanian translated version of ARQ-b (Gullone, Moore, Moss & Boyd, 2000) conceptually equivalent to the original English version of the instrument?
Is the Romanian translated version of ARQ-b (Gullone, Moore, Moss & Boyd, 2000) a psychometrically sound measure of risk-taking behavior in adolescent Romanian population?
Purpose of the Study
The purpose of this study is to deliver a linguistic validated Romanian version of the ARQ - Behavior scale (ARQ-b) (Gullone, Moore, Moss & Boyd, 2000) in order to assess the risk-taking behaviors of adolescents in general and of the public school students in particular. The translated version might be used to identify factors which could be linked to the educational outcomes of the Romanian adolescents. The Romanian translated ARQ-b may assist reaching a more effective understanding of the adolescent risk-behavior engagement phenomenon and its’ associated variables, such as the academic level, motivation to attend school or the intention of school abandonment.
Data collection was conducted online. Permission from the high-school institutional board was obtained in order to disseminate the link for data collection among the students. Participants (N=24), 14 to 19-year-old high-school students (
The Adolescent Risk-taking Questionnaire (Gullone, Moore, Moss & Boyd, 2000) is a 22-item self-reporting scale, each item specifying an individual risk-taking behavior. For both Behavior scale and Perception scale that are included in the questionnaire, the items are organised into four subscales, each one corresponding to a category of risk-taking behavior, such as: thrill-seeking, rebellious risk, reckless risk and antisocial risk (Gullone, Moore, Moss & Boyd, 2000). Thrill-seeking behavior subscale includes actions generally socially accepted, with potential consequences of low severity (Gullone, Moore, Moss & Boyd, 2000). Rebellious risk subscale and Antisocial risk behavior subscale comprise behaviors which can generate threatening social or legal consequences upon the individual and his/her social environment (Gullone, Moore, Moss & Boyd, 2000). Behaviors enveloped by the Reckless risk subscale are considered the most dangerous in terms of potential consequences upon the individual (Gullone, Moore, Moss & Boyd, 2000). The Total risk behavior score can be computed by adding up the ratings for all the items of the scale.
Respondents are asked to rate the incidence with which they engage in a list of 22 specific behaviors, from 0 - which corresponds to „Never done”, to 4- which stands for „Done very often” (Gullone, Moore, Moss & Boyd, 2000). ARQ has demonstrated good psychometric properties in the studies done so far. Thus, the authors reported internal consistency coefficients greater than .8 (Gullone, Paul & Moore, 2000). Test-retest reliability coefficients ranged between .6 and .8 (Gullone, Paul & Moore, 2000). The confirmatory factor analysis validated the four-factor structure of the instrument, for both Behavior and Perception scale (Gullone, Paul & Moore, 2000).
The translation was unfolded according to the literature recommendations (Tsang, Royse & Terkawi, 2017). First, the items of the scale were translated from the source language (
In the next phase (
First, a preliminary internal consistency analysis was conducted for the original and the translated versions of the scale (N=24). Further, the internal consistency analysis was replicated on a larger sample (N=260 adolescents from 4 public high schools in Cluj-Napoca, Romania;
The descriptive results are presented in Table
The preliminary reliability analysis (N=24) revealed Cronbach’s alpha values for the Romanian translated version of ARQ-b of α whilst for the original English version of ARQ-b, α Due to the limited number of participants of the initial sample, further reliability analysis followed on a larger sample (N=260). Cronbach’s alpha values (N=260) of the Romanian translated ARQ-b ranged from .85 to .68, with two coefficients holding values below .7,
The results of the Spearman's correlation analysis (N=24) highlighted a strong, positive correlation between the Romanian translated ARQ-b and original English ARQ-bTotal scores (
The results of the Wilcoxon test failed to reveal significant differences between the Romanian ARQ-b ranks and the English ARQ-b ranks for Total scores (Z=-.858,
The present study aimed to provide a psychometrically valid Romanian translated version of the Adolescent Risk-taking Questionnaire - Behavior Scale (Gullone, Moore, Moss & Boyd, 2000).
The results on the process of the linguistic validation, even though on a small sample, indicate that Romanian ARQ-b is a reliable measure of risk engagement in adolescence. The internal consistency of the overall scale was found acceptable in the preliminary psychometric analysis. Moreover, the results of the reliability analysis on the larger sample revealed good reliability of the overall scale, implying that the Total score was an appropriate measure of risk-behavior engagement in adolescents. These results are in line with the results highlighted by Gullone, Paul & Moore (2000), who reported good reliability values of ARQ. Similar values were found regarding the internal consistencies of Rebellious risk subscale and Reckless risk subscale. However, two of the subscales,
The correlation coefficients of the items pairs held values ranging from moderate to very strong correlations and some diversity among the values of Spearman coefficient can be observed. Hence, item-to-item correlation analysis revealed very high values for some pairs of items, such as item number 2, 12, or 22 and lower correlation values for items number 3 or 4. This variance may be due to the cultural universality (or perfect linguistic equivalence) of some of the underlying concepts (
The results obtained in this linguistic validation study may support a better understanding of the factors that hinder positive developmental outcomes in adolescents in general, and in specific high school settings reporting low school performance in students, for example, or high rates of school abandonment the (
Additionally to the particular sensitivity of adolescents to risk behavior engagement, (Arnett, 1992; Gullone, Moore, Moss & Boyd, 2000; Rai et al., 2003), it has been also noted that specific risk-behaviors can lead to serious long-term consequences on physical and mental health (McCambridge, McAlaney & Rowe, 2011). Thus, it is essential to investigate in-depth the phenomena and to further develop interventions to diminish it.
The data provided through the translated version of ARQ-b might support Romanian researchers to understand more effectively adolescent risk-behavior engagement. Furthermore, the scale might assist Romanian specialists in the field of education in understanding risk-behavior engagement of adolescents in relation to (a) school performance and (b) several psycho-social characteristics of adolescent high-school students and to further devise intervention strategies that promote optimal educational functioning of adolescents.
Withal, this study has some limitations. First, a convenience small sample of adolescents was employed in the preliminary analysis in which the two versions of the scale were compared. Second, the majority of respondents were females. The gender bias might be a reflection of the majority of feminine population in Romania (Holdcroft, 2007; National Institute of Statistics, 2013). The gender variable can be controlled in the future studies. Future investigations need to be carried out on the psychometric characteristics of the ARQ-b Romanian translated, as well as the relationship of risk-engagement in Romanian adolescents and other associated factors.
- Arnett, J. (1992). Review: Reckless behavior in adolescence: A developmental perspective. Developmental Review, 12, 339-373.
- Choudhury, S., Blakemore, S. J., & Charman, T. (2006). Social cognitive development during adolescence. Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 1(3), 165-174.
- Furby, L., & Beyth-Marom, R. (1992). Risk-taking in adolescence: A decision-making perspective. Developmental Review, 12(1), 1-44.
- George, D., & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference. 11.0 update (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn& Bacon.
- Gullone, E., Moore, S., Moss, S., & Boyd, C. (2000). The adolescent risk-taking questionnaire: Development and psychometric evaluation. Journal of Adolescent Research, 15(2), 231-250.
- Gullone, E., Paul, J., & Moore, S. M. (2000). A validation study of the adolescent risk-taking questionnaire. Behaviour Change, 17(03), 143-154.
- Holdcroft, A. (2007). Gender bias in research: how does it affect evidence based medicine? Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 100(1), 2-3.
- Irwin, C.E., Igra, V., Eyre, S., & Millstein, S. (1997). Risk‐taking Behavior in Adolescents: The Paradigma. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 817(1), 1-35.
- Irwin, C.E., Jr. (1993). Adolescence and risk taking: How are they related. In N. J. Bell & R. W. Bell (Eds.), Adolescent risk taking (pp. 7-28). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
- Irwin Jr, C.E., & Ryan, S.A. (1989). Problem behavior of adolescents. Pediatrics in review, 10(8), 235-246.
- Irwin, C.E., & Millstein, S.G. (1986). Biopsychosocial correlates of risk-taking behaviors during adolescence: Can the physician intervene? Journal of Adolescent Health Care, 7(6, Suppl), 82-96.
- McCambridge, J., McAlaney, J., & Rowe, R. (2011). Adult consequences of late adolescent alcohol consumption: a systematic review of cohort studies. PLoS Med, 8(2), e1000413.
- Moore, S., & Gullone, E. (1996). Predicting adolescent risk behavior using a personalized cost-benefit analysis. Journal of youth and adolescence, 25(3), 343-359.
- National Institute of Statistics (2013). Anuarul statisic al României 2013. INSSE. Retrieved 25 April 2016 from http://www.insse.ro/cms/ro/content/anuarul-statistic-al-romaniei-2013.
- Rai, A. A., Stanton, B., Wu, Y., Li, X., Galbraith, J., Cottrell, L., ... & Burns, J. (2003). Relative influences of perceived parental monitoring and perceived peer involvement on adolescent risk behaviors: An analysis of six cross-sectional data sets. Journal of Adolescent Health, 33(2), 108-118.
- Sales, J.M., & Irwin Jr, C.E. (2013). A Biopsychosocial Perspective of Adolescent Health and Disease. In Handbook of Adolescent Health Psychology (pp. 13-29). Springer New York.
- Steinberg, L. (2005). Cognitive and affective development in adolescence. Trends in cognitive sciences, 9(2), 69-74.
- Tsang, S., Royse, C. F., & Terkawi, A. S. (2017). Guidelines for developing, translating, and validating a questionnaire in perioperative and pain medicine. Saudi journal of anaesthesia, 11(Suppl 1), S80.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
About this article
18 December 2019
Print ISBN (optional)
Teacher, teacher training, teaching skills, teaching techniques, special education, children with special needs
Cite this article as:
Chiș, A., & Rusu, A. S. (2019). Romanian Translation And Linguistic Validation Of The Adolescent Risk-Taking Behavior Scale (Arq-B). In V. Chis, & I. Albulescu (Eds.), Education, Reflection, Development – ERD 2017, vol 41. European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences (pp. 249-258). Future Academy. https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2018.06.30