European Proceedings Logo

A Systematic Review On The Relationship Between Organizational Justice And Turnover Intention

Table 1:

Study Study setting Sample size Study design Results
Lee et al. (2016) “G” General Hospital in “G” City 278 hospital nurses Cross-sectional study Organizational justice had a direct negative effect on turnover intention (r = -.357, p = .004).
Shahzad (2016) four different service industries (Financial Services, Banking, Pharmaceutical, and FMCG) 279 sales and marketing managers Cross-sectional study Distributive and procedural justice were negatively related with turnover intention (r = -.555 and r = -.634, p = .01 respectively).
Proost et al. (2015) four nursing houses 197 employees Cross-sectional study Organizational justice had a negative relationship with turnover intention (r = -.34, p < .01).
Khan et al. (2015) a large private university 182 employees Data on justice types are collected in time 1 and turnover intentions in time 2 (1 month later) Distributive and procedural justice were negatively related with turnover intention (r = -.17 and r = -.11, p < .05 respectively).
Biswas (2015) various organizations all over India 295 practicing managers Cross-sectional study Distributive and procedural justice were negatively correlated to intention to quit (r = -.28 and r = -.36, p ≤ .01 respectively).
Zagladi et al. (2015) 12 private colleges in Banjarmasin City 86 lecturers Cross-sectional study Using a 95% confidence level, there was a significant negative effect of organizational justice toward turnover intention (β = -.24, p = .01).
Bakri and Ali (2015) private sector banks of KPK Province 177 bankers Cross-sectional study Organizational justice had a negative relationship with turnover intention (r = -.494).
Lin (2015) 63 work units in a wide variety of industries (manufacturing, education and training services, services, information technology, and trade) 364 employees Cross-sectional study Procedural justice had a negative relationship with turnover intention (r = -.45, p < .01).
Ma et al. (2014) three branches of an air transportation group in Changsha, Shenyang, and Wulumuqi cities 212 supervisor-subordinate dyads Cross-sectional study There was a negative impact of procedural justice on turnover intention (r = -.226, p < .01).
Study Study setting Sample size Study design Results
Al Afari and Elanain (2014) three different public hospitals 448 employees Cross-sectional study There were negative relationships between distributive, interactional, and procedural justice with turnover intention (r = -.42, p < .001, r = -.37, p < .001, and r = -.40, p < .01 respectively).
Chalil and Prasad (2014) a medium sized firm in Bangalore, India 100 software professionals Cross-sectional study Distributive justice was negatively related to turnover intention (r = −.25, p < .05).
Campbell et al. (2014) 228 local government organizations from 16 administrative regions across Korea 1,407 civil servants Cross-sectional study Perceived level of procedural justice was negatively related to turnover intention (r = -.21, p < .001).
Son et al. (2014) a large university 158 mid-level employees who were enrolled as full-time students in MBA programs Longitudinal study (data was collected in two different time points) Interpersonal justice was negatively related to turnover intention (r = -.37, p < .001).
Flint et al. (2013) three call centers in the Province of New Brunswick 212 employees Cross-sectional study Perceptions of procedural justice and interpersonal justice were negatively related to turnover intention (β = -.47, p < .001, β = -.22, p < .01 respectively).
Soltis et al. (2013) two divisions of a mid-sized food and animal safety product manufacturing company 229 employees Cross-sectional study Distributive justice was negatively related with turnover intention (r = -.42).
Meisler (2013) a financial organization located in the center of Israel 368 employees Cross-sectional study Perceived organizational justice was negatively related to turnover intentions (r = -.47, p ≤ .001).
Arshadi and Shahbazi (2013) an industrial organization 309 employees Cross-sectional study Distributive justice related negatively to turnover intention (r = -.359, p < .01).
Davoudi and Fartash (2013) 15 companies in Mazandaran, a northern province of Iran 273 employees Cross-sectional study Organizational justice negatively impacts turnover intention (r = -.61, p = .000).
Campbell et al. (2013) a state’s department of family and children’s services (DFACS) 343 social workers Cross-sectional study Distributive, procedural, and interactional justice were negatively related with turnover intention (r = -.19, r = -.22, and r = -.21, p < .05 respectively).
Study Study setting Sample size Study design Results
Ngo et al. (2013) three large companies in different industries (energy, telecommunication, and manufacturing of multimedia electronics) 591 workers Cross-sectional study Procedural justice was negatively related to intention to leave (r = -.31, p < .01).
Coniglio (2013) PA faculty employed by PA educational programs in 2012 994 physician assistants (PA) faculty Cross-sectional study There was moderate association between intention to leave and distributive justice (r = -.47, p ≤ .0001).
Kim et al. (2012) 51 social welfare service centers 218 front-line social workers Cross-sectional study Organizational justice had a negative effect on intention to leave (r = -.418, p < .01).
Jepsen and Rodwell (2012) a moderate-to- large Australian local government council 301 males and 147 female employees Cross-sectional study The four types of justice (procedural, distributive, interpersonal, and informational) were negatively correlated with turnover intention for men (r = -.114, r = -.141, r = -.191, and r = -.230, respectively) and for women (r = -.274, r = -.409, r = -.322, and r = -.460, respectively).
Wang et al. (2012) 10 organizations in Beijing and Tianjin from various fields (electronics, transportation, healthcare, education and insurance) 218 supervisor-subordinate dyads Cross-sectional study Applicants’ perception of fairness to selection procedures was negatively related to their post-hire turnover intention (r = -.253, p < .01).
Ho (2012) a variety of organization (foreign private sector, local private sector, government- linked companies, civil service/ government sector, non-profit organizations) 305 full-time employees Cross-sectional study Interactional, distributive, and procedural justice were negatively related with turnover intention (r = -.37, r = -.51, and r = -.38, p < .01 respectively).
Poon (2012) five large universities 168 white-collar employees who were enrolled as part-time students in MBA programs Cross-sectional study Distributive and procedural justice were negatively related to turnover intention (r = -.44, p < .001 and r = -.20, p < .01 respectively).
Bernhard-Oettel et al. (2011) seven Belgian organizations (food manufacturing industry and retail industry) 559 respondents Cross-sectional study Perception of fairness associates negatively with turnover intention (r = -.49, p < .01).
Study Study setting Sample size Study design Results
Cantor et al. (2011) commercial motor vehicle (CMV) drivers 604 drivers survey was distributed in the fourth quarter of 2008 through the first quarter of 2009 A driver’s procedural fairness and distributive justice perceptions contributed negatively to their intention to quit (β = -.423 and β = -.196, p < .01 level respectively).
Buttner et al. (2010) the business school faculty professional labor market 182 professionals Cross-sectional study Interactional and procedural justice were negatively related with turnover intention (r = -.41 and r = -.30, p < .001 respectively).
Cole et al. (2010) U.S. Air Force Material Command (AFMC) 869 military personnel and civil servants Cross-sectional study The four types of organizational justice (procedural, distributive, interpersonal, and informational) were negatively correlated with turnover intention (r = -.18, r = -.17, r = -.19, and r = -.13, p < .01 respectively).
Ponnu and Chuah (2010) various organizations across industries 172 employees Cross-sectional study The negative correlations between turnover intention with both procedural and distributive justice were highly significant (r = -.612 and r = -.641, p < .01 respectively).
Silla et al. (2010) an organization pertaining to the public sector 697 Spanish employees Cross-sectional study Fairness was negatively related to intention to quit (r = -.30, p ≤ .01).
Tremblay (2010) five different Army units administered in 2007 and 2008 1,443 Canadian Forces personnel Cross-sectional study Fairness perception was negatively related to turnover intention (r = -.21, p < .01).
de Jong and Schalk (2010) organizations in four sectors (retail, manufacturing, health care, and education) 299 Dutch temporary workers Cross-sectional study Perceived fairness was negatively related to intention to quit (r = -.31, p < .001).
Haar and Spell (2009) a wide variety of industries 184 employees Cross-sectional study Distributive justice was significantly correlated with turnover intentions (r = -.50, p < .01).
More and Tzafrir (2009) 62 teams of a pharmaceutical company in Israel, UK, and Hungary 205 employees Cross-sectional study The four types of justice (distributive, procedural, interpersonal, and informational) were negatively correlated with turnover intention (r = -.37, r = -.37, r = -.30, and r = -.39, p < .01 respectively).
Study Study setting Sample size Study design Results
Elanain (2009) five large organizations representing service and industrial product organizations 350 employees Cross-sectional study Distributive justice had a negative relationship with turnover intention (r = -.41, p < .01).
Kuvaas (2008) 64 local savings banks in Norway 593 employees Cross-sectional study Interactional and procedural justice were negatively related with turnover intention (r = -.31 and r = -.35, p < .01 respectively).
Paré and Tremblay (2007) Quebec members of the Canadian Information Processing Society (CIPS) who represent a wide variety of IT jobs and organizational settings 394 Canadian IT professionals Cross-sectional study There was a negative relationship between perceived procedural fairness and turnover intention (β = -.24, p < .05).
Ansari et al. (2007) Nine multinational companies which were primarily dealing in semiconductor, medical products, and automobile components 224 managers Cross-sectional study Procedural justice climate had a negative relationship with turnover intention (r = -.46, p < .01).
Ahuja et al. (2007) a company in the computer and software services industry 171 IT professionals Cross-sectional study Fairness of rewards had a negative relationship with turnover intention (r = -.38, p < .01).
Loi et al. (2006) law firms 514 practicing solicitors Cross-sectional study Procedural and distributive justice were negatively related to intention to leave (r = -.40 and r = -.36, p < .001 respectively).
Byrne (2005) a single division of a hospital in the western region of the United States 150 full-time employees (nurses, technicians, and therapists) Cross-sectional study Procedural and interactional justice were negatively related with turnover intention (r = -.32 and r = -.37, p < .01 respectively).
Chawla and Kelloway (2004) two organizations that had undergone a merger 164 employees Cross-sectional study Procedural justice climate had a negative relationship with turnover intention (r = -.40, p < .001).
Aryee et al. (2002) a public-sector organization in Bilaspur, Madhy Pradash state in India 179 supervisor-subordinate dyads Cross-sectional study Distributive, procedural, and interactional justice were negatively correlated with turnover intention (r = -.45, r = -.31, and r = -.43, p < .01 respectively).
Study Study setting Sample size Study design Results
Aryee and Chay (2001) a large public-sector union 187 members Cross-sectional study Procedural and distributive justice were negatively related with turnover intention (r = -.30 and r = -.21, p < .01 respectively).
< Back to article