Starting with 2013, the European Union (EU) and the United States of America (USA) are negotiating over what is expected to become the largest bilateral trade and investment agreement that was ever agreed on. The process counted 13 rounds of negotiations and several groups of interest that were a part of the good course of the round table talks; within the EU-US Summit of 2011, a High Level Working Group on Jobs and Growth (HLWG) was created, being designed to find new ways of improving the transatlantic trade flows and ease the investment decision implementation; this group issued two years later a Report that represented the basis for the start of the negotiations over TTIP. Assuring the sides, the negotiators of the two economic powers are the European Commission (EC) on one side and the United States Trade Representative (USTR) on the other side. In June 2013 the representatives of the EC and USTR initiated the first round of negotiations; these events were accompanied by civil society dialogues that took place mirroring the location on where the negotiations were held. After the first three negotiation rounds, an Advisory Group formed of experts and practitioners was instituted, designed to offer expertise for the diplomats involved in the TTIP talks. The end of this long process is expected to be met by December 2016, even though the 24 chapters are not fully negotiated and several aspects still need to be given a better understanding.
Keywords: TTIPEUUSinternational negotiation
1. Initial remarks
In a society that is every day affected even more by the evolution of the global markets, the two
largest economic powers of the world decided to take measures in order to keep their top trade and
investment positions and even to improve their economic performances. For these reasons, the
European Union (EU) and the United States of America (USA) decided within the G8 Summit from
2013 to launch negotiations on what is going to become the largest and the most comprehensive
bilateral trade and investment agreement that was ever agreed on.
On a timeline of 13 rounds of negotiations disposed on a period of over two years, the
representatives of both parties announced that it is expected that the negotiations over TTIP to be ended
by December 2016, while a 14th round of negotiations is going to occur by the month of July of the
current year. The process counted numerous official and ah-hoc meetings among officials and
interested parties, the representatives of the European Commission and the United States Trade
Representatives being the main negotiators on the table.
The ratification of the bilateral treaty will join the agreement and/or disagreement of the Parliament
of the EU and the Council, along with the opinions of both Houses of the Congress of the United States
and the ratification of the President of the USA. The results of implementing the provisions of TTIP are
expected to be fully known by 2025, but only in the eventuality of concluding the agreement by the end
of the current year.
2. The HLWH and the process of negotiation
EU and US are the main two parts of the largest bilateral trade relationship in the world, accounting
for more than a half of the world’s GDP and over a third of the total trade flows. For a better
enhancement of this situation, in 2007 it was created the Transatlantic Economic Council (abbreviated
as TEC), designed to focus on economic interests and to have better common decisions in regard with
the arising problems of the globalization.
Given the fact that one of the most ardent issues within these high-level talks was job creation and
the raise of the mutual investments across the Atlantic economy, a new initiative has aroused with the
EU-US Summit from November 2011: TEC was tasked to form a High Level Working Group (HLWG)
which was designed to find solutions that would engage the transatlantic economy and offer options in
this regard (EC, DG Trade, 2011). For these reasons, the newly formed High Level Working Group
was to be chaired by representatives of the two involved economies, as following: the EU was
represented by the EU Commissioner for Trade – Karel de Gucht, and US Trade Representative Ron
Kirk was the liaison for the American side of the Atlantic; the tasks of the HLWG were to identify
means of raising the investments potential and to identify the opportunities that would generate a
highest percentage of jobs and growth.
By June 2012, HLWG issued an interim report, presenting conclusions and recommendations that
would apply to both of the economies; in February 2013 a final report was issued by the High Level
Working Group on Jobs and Growth, recommending to the two transatlantic economies to launch the
negotiations on a “comprehensive trade and investment agreement” (EC, DG Trade, 2013).
The recommendation was referred to three main negotiation areas, among which can be found the
Market Access, the Regulatory Issues and the Non-Tariff Barriers and the Rules addressing Shared
Global Trade Challenges and Opportunities. The negotiations could only be launched in accordance
with the domestic procedures, given the fact that the EU is a politico-economic union formed out of 28
Member States, and the USA is a federal republic which includes 50 states. It is to be observed that the
structure of the ongoing negotiations is still keeping the structure of the three parts, as firstly
recommended by the HLWH, and includes issues grouped into 24 chapters.
Following the internal procedures, both EU and USA started the preparation for launching the
negotiations. The EU internal procedures in regard with the international trade agreements negotiations
request that the European Commission has to make proposals to the Member States (MS) within
negotiation directives; the agreement of the MS is presented to the Council that is entitled to give green
light to the Commission to start the negotiations. In the case of the United States, the internal procedure
for starting negotiations over an international trade agreement implies that the General Administration
has to send a notification to the Congress which has to reply with favorable or non-favorable, within a
period of 90 days.
In May 2013, in Europe, the European Parliament adopted a resolution announcing its intent to
closely monitor the process of the TTIP negotiations. On 14 of June 2013 the European Commission
officially approved the start of the negotiations over a transatlantic trade and investment partnership
with the United States of America.
On 14 of June 2013 the Council officially approves the start of the negotiations over a
comprehensive trade and investment bilateral agreement with the USA. Following this procedure, on
17 of June 2013, within the G8 Summit the negotiations over a comprehensive transatlantic trade and
investment agreement were officially launched; at this event were attending the Prime Minister of the
United Kingdom David Cameron, the President of the European Commission Jose Manuel Barroso, the
President of the United States of America Barak Obama and the President of the European Council
Herman Van Rompuy. As it can be observed, all the institutions that are currently involved for
concluding TTIP were present at the launch of the negotiations.
3. Who is negotiating
The Transatlantic Trade and Investment Agreement (TTIP) is a bilateral trade agreement which is
currently negotiated between European Union on one side and the United States of America on the
other side. The purpose of starting such a long and difficult process is the aim of the two greatest
economic powers of the world to pioneer the potential of the transatlantic market place and bring
considerable gains for both of the parties.
The significant gains that could result from reaching an agreement would include more than 119
billion a year for the EU and over 95 billion a year for the US (EC, 2013).The negotiation period was at
first estimated for two years, but even so, the political situation on both of the shores seems to interfere
on a High- Level so that the estimations of reaching an agreement within the first trimester of 2016
The negotiations are developing between two main negotiation teams, representing the interests of
the European Union on one side and the ones of the United States on the other; the frequency of these
meetings does not have a pattern, but the place where the one week of negotiations is held alternates
between the Atlantic shores (see Table 1).
The teams of negotiations are led by a Chief Negotiator, followed by individuals whose area of
expertise cover all the subjects that are to be discussed within the negotiation sessions of TTIP; the
negotiators are officials that work for the European Commission, the Council and the European
Parliament, but they also gather personnel with diplomatic expertise that act within European structures
like the European External Action Service (EEAS) or the European Council of Foreign Relations.
While being a part of the negotiating team of an international trade agreement, the negotiators will have
the status of diplomatic personnel of an international European entity.
The negotiating teams that act in the name of the United States of America are a part of the
personnel of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) which are a part of the diplomatic body of
the USA; in negotiating over TTIP their work is completed with the help of economic and other area
specialists whose expertise is relevant for the negotiation chapter relevant for TTIP.
The timing and length of a negotiation round is settled by a joint agreement of the Chief
Negotiators; they take decisions about the topics that are to be covered within a negotiation round and
make suggestions in regard with the presence in negotiations of the needed specialist and negotiators.
Depending on the items on the working agenda, a team of negotiators may not exceed 20 members; it is
important to note that the development of the negotiations implies group working sessions that are
conducted by a lead negotiator whose expertise is relevant in the given topic. These working groups are
formed out of representatives of both parties – EU and US, and work by following a common agenda
who was previously discussed by the Chiefs of the Negotiators.
Given the fact that the economic diplomacy is being rewritten with the occasion of negotiating over
TTIP, a new type of hybrid diplomacy arises, combining formal and informal meeting among
diplomats and High-Level representatives, while the area of expertise has a greater importance than in
the traditional diplomatic relations. As a proof, the Chief Negotiators of EU and US maintain a
permanent contact and establish the subjects of informal meetings that happen outside the formal
negotiation rounds; in the same manner, the homologue of the members of the negotiation teams may
keep a permanent contact, with the purpose of speeding up the occurrence of the formal rounds and
offering relevant issues to be discussed on the table.
By 2016, a number of 13 rounds of negotiations have occurred, the EC estimating that by July 2016
a 14th round of negotiations (Garcia Bercero, 2016) will take place, having as a main objective the
work of consolidation in all areas. Given this data, the initial term for concluding the negotiations was
already elapsed, furthering the potential enhancement of the both transatlantic economies; on a general
view, with the TPP already concluded and bilateral initiatives of economic cooperation among the
newborn global economies, TTIP should reassure its initial purpose of keeping the top positions as
world economic powers both for EU and USA and conclude the negotiations by the end of 2016 the
4. The civil society dialogues
One of the mandatory procedures that the European legislation imposes when the European
Commission is proposing a negotiation for an international trade and investment agreement is the civil
society dialogues. The purpose of such a dialogue is for the EC to reveal topics of interest for the
relevant members and receive feedback that shall be used within the negotiations. The civil society
interests are represented within this dialogue by members of the NGO’s, business owners, members of
the agriculture groups and/or industry (EC, DG Trade, 2013).
In the case of TTIP this type of gatherings were not missing; there were held with an increased
frequency at the beginning of the negotiations, for as long as the topics discussed had a more general
character; once the negotiations over TTIP became more technical, the dialogues with the civil society
became less frequent.
The civil society dialogues could occur during the negotiation sessions, or at the end of a week of
talk on the round table; in the case of TTIP, representatives of both parties, and usually the Chief
Negotiators were the ones offering information to the interested members of the civil society about the
topics discussed or that were about to be touched during the next sessions.
By April 2016 when the 13th round of negotiations over TTIP took place in New York, USA there
were a number of 8 civil society communication sessions. The location of these gatherings is mirroring
the one of where the negotiations take place, alternatively in Europe and North America. The timing of
these civil society gatherings in parallel with the negotiation rounds and the Advisory Group meetings
can be consulted in the Annex 1.
5. The negotiation rounds and the Advisory Group
The first three rounds of negotiation were expected to familiarize the negotiators with the subjects
that were to be negotiated, with the issues that were to arise and with the negotiating potential of their
rivals. The end of the negotiations on the three rounds marked the end of the initial phase of
negotiations. The subsequent negotiations didn’t follow the general character of the previous ones; the
working groups were formed, individual topics were negotiated and the first text proposals were made,
representing the interests of both of the parties. As the negotiations advanced, the talks around the
TTIP text evolved to an in-depth analysis, with text proposals and text removals where the role of a
group of experts was increasingly necessary.
The Contents of TTIP follows the general three main parts and 24 chapters as established by the
HLWG: Market Access, Regulatory Cooperation and Rules. The negotiations comply with these three
main areas, but the working groups are negotiating the technical issues for each paragraph of each
The Market Access tries to improve the existing legislation and find ways to improve the chances of
the EU companies to get a better access on the transatlantic market; TTIP encourages the increase in
imports and exports of goods and services in and outside the European Union and to help businesses to
invest more easily in the United States.
The Regulatory Cooperation is designed to ease the administrative rules and regulations to be
obeyed when importing or exporting on the shores of the Atlantic; the main problems consist in
technical details and checking procedures that usually have different names but similar requirements.
This chapter aims on a reciprocal rules recognition and standard match for both economic powers
The Rules part is set in order to issue new rules for the benefit of the small companies, trade unions
and consumer and green groups, along with the non-governmental organizations (ONG). The rules will
be set in order to access more easily energy and raw materials, to invest within a protected legal
framework and save time and money on paperwork when dealing with the customs rules.
An important aspect of the evolution of the negotiations over TTIP was the creation of an Advisory
Group on January 2014, only after three rounds of negotiations have occurred. The purpose of this
group is to offer expertise to the negotiators in the areas where technical issues overlap the competency
of the diplomats that take part within the negotiation sessions. The consultative role of the 14 members
is given by their area of expertise, from industry to sustainability or public health, business
environment and services.
The Advisory Group has unlimited access to the negotiation confidential paperwork, so that their
expertise will not only be given as having the source of the public declarations made by EU and USA
negotiators. The meetings are being presided by the EU Chief Negotiator Ignacio Garcia Bercero, who
is also organizing gatherings in-between the one-week negotiations, in order to gain expertise related to
the negotiated topics (EC, 2016). This Group will be working officially for two years, or, in the
eventuality that an agreement over TTIP will not be made, until the end of the negotiations.
It is to be noticed the diplomatic importance of this Advisory Group, the presence of representatives
of a varied area of topics that come to accomplish the work of the EU negotiators and increase the level
of trust and communication among the teams. This represents a new dimension of the economic
diplomacy, completed with an ad-hoc diplomatic tendency, designed to reach a better result for the
6. The ratification process
The European Parliament and the Council are the institutions which are responsible from the side of
the European Union with the ratification of the international trade and investment agreements. The
proposal comes from the European Commission, which is also the institution that has the attribution of
negotiating on an international level. The will of the Member States of the EU is being represented by
the European Council, together with the European Parliament that also holds the legislative power of
In the case of the United States of America, the ratification of an international trade and investment
agreement that was negotiated, belongs to the Congress with its both houses – Senate and the House of
Representatives that have the privilege of controlling the development of the procedures to be followed
by all the 50 federal states (National Foreign Trade Council, 2014).
In the eventuality of reaching an agreement, the full benefits of TTIP are expected to be detected not
earlier than 10 years after its full implementation. The immediate effect of TTIP will be the reducing of
the trade barriers among the two powers, fact that will improve the market access of the two economies
to the transatlantic market, from where will benefit not only the European companies, but also to the
7. Final remarks
The increased dimensions of the two economies that mainly operate on the transatlantic market – the
EU and the USA, will determine the economies that are not a part of the TTIP trade deal to comply
with the newly implemented standard regimes, resulting in the creation of a collateral effect consisting
in an immediate economic growth towards the new entered actors.
The effect of implementing TTIP it is considered to be similar to the one that implementing the EU
Single Market was, fact that not only influenced the Member States position in the European trade, but
also the one of the USA when trading with the EU.
By negotiating a so considered free trade agreement that will reunite the transatlantic market and
make it singular on the world, the EU and the US try to prevent the effects that other trade and
investment agreements would have over their economies. Agreements like the Trans-Pacific
Partnership or the bilateral free trade agreements that the emerging Asian economies are negotiating
within the ASEAN framework represent a threat to the wellbeing of the transatlantic existing economy;
by agreeing over TTIP, both EU and US operate like taking safeguard about the steadiness of the
global trade and investment and their positive implications within it.
EU and USA are still negotiating over what is expected to be the largest bilateral economic
agreement of the world; but the economic instability of the EU of the last years and the political issues
of the USA from the presidential elections put an uncertain turn in the evolution of the negotiations; so
far, TTIP already passed the due date for concluding, and a fruitful end is not expected by the end of
2016, even though a 14th round of negotiations is expected to be announced by the end of June of the
current year. This situation turns on questions about EU and USA reaching an agreement over TTIP in
time to enhance both economies and safeguard their importance on a global market.
- European Commission, DG Trade (2011). EU and US boost economic partnership. Brussels, available at http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/press/index.cfm?id=757.
- European Commission, DG Trade (2013). Final Report High Level Working Group on Jobs and Growth, available at http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2013/february/tradoc_150519.pdf.
- European Commission (2013). Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership. The Economic Analysis Explained (pp. 6-7), available at http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2013/september/tradoc_151787.pdf.
- Garcia Bercero, I. (2016). Conclusion of the 13th TTIP Negotiation Round, available at http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2016/april/tradoc_154480.pdf.
- European Commission, DG Trade (2013). Civil Society Dialogue: TTIP – update on first round, available at http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/press/index.cfm?id=945.
- European Commission (2016). Register of Commission Expert Groups and other similar entities. Group Details – Commission Expert Group, available at http://ec.europa.eu/transparency/regexpert/index.cfm?do=groupDetail.groupDetail&groupID=2988&NewSe arch=1&NewSearch=1.
- National Foreign Trade Council (2014). The European Union and TTIP: How does it work?, available at http://www.nftc.org/default/trade/European%20Union%20and%20TTIP.pdf.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
About this article
04 October 2016
Print ISBN (optional)
Communication, communication studies, social interaction, moral purpose of education, social purpose of education
Cite this article as:
Gutu, I. (2016). EU and US, Reaching an Agreement over TTIP?. In A. Sandu, T. Ciulei, & A. Frunza (Eds.), Logos Universality Mentality Education Novelty, vol 15. European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences (pp. 448-455). Future Academy. https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2016.09.58