This study presents an analysis of the concept of social justice from the perspective of the Eastern Orthodox Christianism, showing the specificity of the Orthodox approach and the elements in common with the Western religious and lay perspective. Social justice is one of the concepts necessary to today’s religious and political vision, often used prudently in the East-European area, especially due to the fact that during the communist period it was used as a current slogan, without much coverage in practice. This concept is an essential component of the prophetic message, in the Hebrew area, but also in the Evangels’ discourse. For the Christians, social justice is a community imperative, resulting from the revealed, divine message itself. The article presents the main elements of this concept, in its historical evolution, its development in the Western, Catholic area, and its comparative approach in the Orthodox area. We have analysed the concept, both theologically, theoretically, and practically, as it can be found in the conception of the Orthodox Church and as it has been promoted by means of the social-philanthropic mission.
Keywords: Social equityChurchsocial-philanthropic missionOrthodox
The present approach also concerns the contribution that the Orthodoxy brings to the construction of
a better, juster and more humane world, by Christian humanism understanding the principle of respect
and of promotion of man and all that is his, as a special being, created in God’s image, with deep
spiritual aspirations (Clement, 1988). Consequently, the Church has the awareness that it is her duty to
bring“hope where there is despair; love and communion where there is division and hate; dignity
where human dignity has been forgotten or disconsidered”. (Daniel, Patriarch of the Romanian
Orthodox Church, 2007)
Social justice is, from a Christian perspective, a need of any human society, without which one
cannot conceive peace and social harmony. It is a fundamental right of the human being, bestowed by
the Creator, which refers to the fact that man’s dignity needs to be respected, including regarding the
access to means supporting man’s existence materially. From a Christian perspective, social justice
refers to man’s equitable access to work and to what is necessary for the daily life.
Consequently, when we talk about this concept, we refer, on the one hand, to the communities’ and
the states’ obligation of excluding noone from the possibility of earning his daily existence, and, on the
other hand, to the modality by which, when man finds it impossible to have access to these
fundamental rights, he is supported to lead a minimal existence.
At the same time, the whole social-philanthropic activity of the Church is included in the concept of
social justice, because this is the aim of the Church, to make equity easier to achieve in the
communities made up of or inhabited by Christians.
Having the calling to reveal “
maximal value to the human existence, considering it God’s most precious gift, because: “
man, in each man, the living image of God Himself, an image that finds its full meaning in Christ and is
called to find out to a deeper scope its full meaning in Christ, the perfect Image of God, the Revealer of
God to men and the Revealer of man to himself”. (***. 2006: 70)
The Western area is dominated, regarding the social doctrine of the Church, by the documents of the
magisterium, and as a historical departure point, Pope Leo XIII’s encyclical “
main reference element. The Orthodox area has no official magisterial document, yet the concept can
be found in the episcopal pastoral letters and in the holistic approach of the social policy of the Church.
(Heckel, 1978: 21).
2. Social Justice –a Contemporary Doctrinal Necessity
From a practical perspective, social justice has in view the concrete accomplishment of St. James
the Apostle’s principle, according to which “
solidarity, communion and love that need to dominate the Christian communities or the communities
inhabited by Christians, as St. Paul the Apostle said: “
with it ”(1 Cor. 12: 26) or “Bear one another’s burdens, and in this way you will fulfil the law of
Supporting those in various difficulties, deprivations and needs is an obligation for every Christian.
The fact of materially supporting one’s fellow going through a difficult period of his life is a necessity
springing from the commandment of love given by Jesus Christ our Lord, but also a practical need
having in view the stability, peace and harmony in a certain human community.
No Christian faithful to Christ’s teachings can be indifferent to his fellow who is in difficulty and
constraint, no authentic Christian can continue his existence without caring for his fellow and without
doing something to change his fellow’s unfortunate state. (Teşu, 2003: 6: 68)
Thus, “The Church has rejected the totalitarian and atheist ideologies, associated in the modern
times with communism or socialism. At the same time, she has rejected the individualistic capitalism
and the absolute primacy of the human labour market. The regulation of the economy only by
centralized planning perverts the basis of the social connections, its regulation only by means of the
market law cannot achieve social justice, because there are numerous human needs that cannot be met
by means of the market.” (***, 1993: 502-503)
Social justice also has in view an equitable repartition of the goods and an adequate reward of work
in society, a correct access of the people to the means needed for their daily life, and a system meant to
correct the eventual slids of certain inequitable situations.
Man’s fundamental duty given by his Creator is to work (Dufour, 2001: 455), but when he cannot
do this fundamental human act, he needs to be supported, because without work he cannot have the
daily necessities. The Church never tried to promote a certain type of social system or social-political
ideology, although there have been cases when Church people have promoted ideologies or social
systems, a fact that cannot be considered as ecclesial involvement.
There have even been cases when the promotion of the idea of social justice was considered as a
tendency of leaning towards communism or socialism, especially in Eastern Europe, regarding the
Orthodox Churches, or in South America, concerning the Catholic Church. To this day, there are
enough supporters of Samuel Huntington’s civilizational clash theory, or Max Weber’s ethical theory
(Weber, 2003), which establish a relation between economic performance and the Christian
confessional belonging, putting the Protestantism (and, among its various types, Calvinism) on the first
position in this sense, then the Catholicism, and, after that, the Orthodoxy. (Popescu, 1998: 72)
This theory is, however, not enough to make a deep analysis of the faith-related psychology and its
impact on the economic life, but is rather a theory belonging to the Cold War period, which was
with religious arguments.
Regarding communism, we need to affirm that it was not promoted by the Orthodox Churches and
even by no Christian Church at all, and it was not an offspring of Christianism, but, on the contrary,
Christianism was the fiercest adversary of communism.
The trend of certain clerics - Catholic, South-American leftists - belonging to the so-called theology
of deliverance, must be viewed in the larger social-political and economic context of that area, yet with
the mention that the Church does not dogmatize, does not ideologize any socio-political and economic
theory, and sometimes personal and even sliding are personal options of one or the other of the Church
servants, which means no commitment for the institution, since the Church, on the contrary, often took
measures when they became a must. (Dalberg-Acton, 1998: 614)
3.Social Justice – Common Hebrew-Christian Theological Patrimony
Social justice is a Hebrew-Christian concept, because although it has had an amazing development
in Christianism, the roots of this concept can be found in the work of the Hebrew prophets who
promoted social justice in their writings and activity.
We find, therefore, very topical ideas in the writings of the biblical prophets, who can constitute a
source of inspiration for the contemporary social Christian activism, but who substantiate, from a
doctrinal perspective, the Orthodox Christian teaching of faith and not only it.
From this perspective, the most eloquent example is that of Prophet Elijah, considered the first and
the most important fighter for social justice in the biblical area. The Hebrew tradition records many of
his actions; however, from the Holy Scripture, we know about his action in defence of his concitizen
Naboth, from whom King Ahab wanted to take away his property, namely a vineyard.
The prophet successfully defends the poor and powerless, whom the king was about to aggrieve,
although a king is supposed to be the first example of justice and goodness.This is just an example,
but, in numerous other situations, prophet Elijah acts as a defender of justice, which he sees as an
expression of God’s will, this is why it needs to be respected, because any infringement of it is an
impiety against the Creator (1 Kings 21:20-23).
Another example of prophet committed to the promotion of social justice is Amos, who vehemently
stands against injustice, against the exploitation of the poor, against the desire of dishonest gain, and
against aggrieving the poor and totally defenceless. He establishes a clear connection between social
injustice and the infringement of God’s will (Amos 5:7, 10-12; 6:4-7; 8:4-7). Another strong example
of promoter of social justice is Prophet John, the Lord’s Forerunner and Baptizer, who makes the
passage from the period of the Old Testament to that of the New Testament. With strong words (Mt.
3:7-8, 10, 12), he criticizes social injustice and those who commit it, showing that they are submitting
themselves to an immediate divine justice (Luke 3: 10-14).
Not doing any injustice to God’s most precious creature, namely man, is an obligation, since the
human being, created in God’s image, has inalienable rights. Then, it is only for man that God became
a man or was embodied, as we confess in the
reason, man has a special, divine dignity, and infringing it means offending the divine majesty,
infringing the Fatherly love of the heavenly Father.
The dignity of being created in God’s image, after His endless likeness (Genesis 1: 26, 28), gives
man fundamental rights, and violating them leads to God’s immediate intervention in favour of the
oppressed. Man has been created for solidarity, communion and love (Nellas, 1994: 7), man is a social
being (Breck, 2001: 269), and therefore has the duty to militate for social justice.
The human being was created by God, not to launch himself in “
but in the endless race after God’s likeness. The race after material goods is a diabolical overturn of
the race to which man has been called, of the race after perennial and absolute values, truth, good,
4.Social justice in the doctrine of the Orthodox Church
From the perspective of social involvement, the Orthodox Church has not elaborated a special Body
of Doctrine, as the Catholic Church, which has numerous papal encyclicals, or magisterial documents
regulating, from a doctrinal perspective, the ecclesial social involvement out of two reasons.
The first is that the commandment of love given by Christ comprises in it the whole foundation of
the Christian social involvement, and the second is the fact that the Orthodoxy tends rather towards the
liturgical, cultic side, devoid of excessive dogmatization and regulation.
Sure, this does not mean that there are no synodal decisions, pastoral hierarchic letters or other such
documents providing clarifications on the social involvement of the Church. The Orthodoxy considers
each problem of a human person as being also a problem of the community, and the social Orthodox
ideal is that of communion, according to the principle of the Eucharistic Communion. (Zizioulas, 1967)
From this perspective, in the social domain, the Orthodoxy promotes the Eucharistic principle of
communion and solidarity, even though the present civilization tacitly imposes that model of “
The Orthodoxy has always given prevalence to action rather than theory; consequently, it preferred
to act, without needing a Body of Doctrine meant to justify its social-philanthropic actions. The
supreme reason substantiating the ecclesial activity in favour of social equity is constituted by the
Embodiment of God’s Son and by the example of His activity in favour of man (Lk. 22: 27; Mt. 25: 31-
41), which makes “life in the Church, to which each one is called [be]: ceaseless service of Christ and
We have got used - especially in the theological, but also in the mediatic area - to considering that
the Protestant Churches and the Catholic Church are, exclusively, those making great and many
philanthropic actions, and the Orthodoxy would prefer the so-called liturgical ghetto. (Bădiliţă &
Urian, 2003: 148) There is nothing less true than this, since the Orthodoxy, especially the Romanian
one, has promoted the acts of spiritual and physical charity, social justice, as the doctrine would put it,
Yet, the Orthodoxy has had a reticence regarding the popularization of its actions, following the
principle that good actions are not made for publicity and gaining earthly pride and praises, but they
ought to be accomplished by any man, following the all-merciful example of God Himself.
As we move on in this information age, an age in which information is especially short and with a
massive emotional impact, the Orthodox Church has begun to make its social-philanthropic activity
known, with discernment and yet still with a certain discretion, precisely in order to show that she is
not at all unaware of the contemporary man’s needs and aspirations and she is by the side of her sons
and daughters during all the moments of their life, and especially during the hard ones.
The Orthodoxy is aware that it cannot solve all the social problems of humanity, it could not, even if
she wanted to, because if even the very rich States cannot eliminate social inequality, how could the
Church manage to do it, since she does not have their financial and legislative resources!
Yet, the Church continues to do what she must do and what she knows to do, what her Divine
Teacher is teaching her, namely: offer help according to her powers, according to the extent of her
believers’ involvement, to provide examples, for the people, especially for the believers, to imitate
what she does by providing such an existential paradigm.
The Orthodoxy has neither codified nor theorized its social-philanthropic mission, considering that
love to one’s fellow is an aspect inseparable from the love to God, therefore from the quality of
authentic believer, yet she is acting for the better of the society in which she is active.
The philanthropic logic of the Orthodoxy is that man is the most important being in the Universe,
and economic activity and profit follow him and are not above him, which is why the famous capitalist
the greatest gift of God for man, after life.
And while money can be made, time does fly irremediably, and cannot be brought back. The
importance of time in the Orthodoxy is given by the fact that it is the framework in which life, the
knowledge of God and the practice of His likeness take place. (Lorenz, 1996: 34)
The emergence of a new civilizational paradigm given by the industrialization age, caused major
social-economic changes, challenging the Church to an adequate answer, since
namely capital and a new form of work, salarized work, characterized by oppressive production
rhythms... determined only by the criterion of profit-increase efficacy had emerged. (Ică & Marani,
In the West, the Catholic Church, with an early experience in the capitalist economic development,
but also in the effects of secularism and globalization, more marked than in the East, according to its
juridist and doctrinal organizational spirit, theorized its social doctrine by means of the encyclicals:
by Pope Pius XI in the year 1931); Pope John XXIII’s
(1963); Pope Paul VI’s
These documents express the Catholic social doctrine from an official perspective, being norms for
the Catholic Church, and many of the ideas here have been used as well even by Eastern theologians,
yet without being appropriated by the Orthodox Churches, as they also bear the specific mark of the
Catholic theology, which in some aspects differs from the Orthodox one.
The Orthodoxy views responsibility to our fellows’ needs and even the very need for social equity
as coming from the notion of God’s image (Lossky, 1993: 144) and from freedom as an inalienable
divine gift. (Stăniloae, 1995: 80) There is, and we need to highlight this as well, a common, ecumenical
action, too, regarding social justice worldwide, involving all the Christian confessions and a testimony
in this sense are the various and increasingly numerous ecumenical reunions and common actions, or
the documents of the World Council of Churches.
This main forum of ecumenical Christian dialogue, in which the Orthodox Churches are members,
has a specialized department for social mission, and in its important documents, the social problems
and the issue of social equity are always present.
As a theologian at the Archiepiscopate of Târgovişte, I would like to highlight that the social
activity of this eparchy has in view the intensification, from one year to the next, of the social
involvement, in order to support the attainment of a social equity as wide as possible.
Thus His Eminence Father Archbishop and Metropolitan
Theology and Education Sciences of “
emitted on the occasion of our Lord’s Birth and Resurrection, or in the messages issued on various
occasions, approached, each time, a complex set of social problems, from the concrete issues of
poverty, and social inequity to the problems of the abandoned or lonely children, or the diseased and
the elderly from social institutions. (***, 2002-2016)
Social justice represents a fundamental theological concept for the teaching of faith of the Orthodox
Church, as, actually, of the whole contemporary Christian theology, being very important for today’s
It refers to the ecclesial activity meant to support the realization of social justice in our world, by
means of solidarity and love, in a concrete manner by helping those in need, but also by creating a just,
correct and harmonious social atmosphere.
The Christian social justice has nothing violent or revolutionary in it, like the social Marxist politics,
but aims to revolutionize the social paradigm by means of inner change, transfiguration and
spiritualization, but also by promoting solidarity, by giving rise to a community effort meant to help
those in need.
The transformation of the social framework, often affected by inequity, is achieved according to the
Christian conception and action by means of the Church, by a common sacramental, spiritual and
philanthropic action, which has in view our fellows’ welfare.
The Orthodoxy brings this vision, as a gift and contribution, for our world, which has had enough of
the utopic or inefficient ideologies and models that have generated conflicts or tensions and have nor
managed to create a correct, just, harmonious social climate, capable of giving hope and faith.
The Orthodox Christian has in his conscience the image of the Final Judgement, which, all of it, as it
is presented by the evangelist Matthew, has, as its criterion of judgement, the care for our fellow, the
way we have manifested our help to our fellows. From this perspective, the Orthodox Christian knows
that his salvation, his eternal happiness is related to the solidarity and love for our fellow who is here in
need, in trouble or in suffering.
The present study has wished to highlight the general features of the Orthodox conception on social
justice and the practical way of accomplishing this desideratum, in the light of my Romanian Orthodox
theological, scientific and administrative activity in the framework of the Archiepiscopate of
- *** (1993). The Catechism of the Catholic Church. Bucharest: EARCB.
- *** (2002-2016). Church Almanac of the Archiepiscopate of Târgoviște. Târgovişte: Ed. Arhiepiscopiei Târgoviştei.
- *** (2006). The Social Doctrine of the Church. Compendium. vol. II. Bucarest: EARCB.
- Bădiliţă, C., Urian, T. (2003). The Nostalgy of Europe. A Volume in Honour of Alexandru Paleologu. Iasi: Polirom.
- Breck, J. (2001). The Sacred Gift of Life. Cluj-Napoca: Ed. Patmos.
- Clement, O. (1988). Confessing in a Secularized Society. “Contacts”, p. 144.
- Dalberg-Acton, J. E. (1998). Essays în Religion, Politics and Morality: Selected Writings of Lord Acton. ed. J.F. Fears, III. Indianapolis: Liberty Classics.
- Daniel, Patriarch of the Romanian Orthodox Church. (2007). Discourse on the Occasion of the Official Resuming of the Classes at the Faculty of Orthodox Theology at Al. I. Cuza University of Iași. 15 October 1990) apud *** (2010). The Awarding of the Title of Doctor Honoris Causa to His Beatitude Father Patriarch Daniel by Al. I. Cuza University of Iași, Laudatio. Iaşi: Doxologia. p.7.
- Dufour, L. X. (2001). Biblical Theology Vocabulary. Bucharest: EARCB.
- Heckel, R. (1978). Self-Reliance. Pontifical Commission on Justice and Peace. Vatican City.
- Ică, jr., I., Marani, G. (2001). The Social Thinking of the Church. Sibiu: Deisis.
- Lipovetsky, G. (2007). Paradoxical Happyness. Essay on the Hyperconsumption Society. Iaşi: Ed. Polirom. Lorenz, K. (1996). Civilized Man’s Eight Deadly Sins. Bucharest: Humanitas.
- Lossky, V. (1993). The Mystical Theology of the Eastern Church. Bucharest: Anastasia.
- Mihăiţă, N. (2005). Archbishop and Metropolitan. Christian Missiology. Bucharest: Asa.
- Nellas, P. (1994). Deification in Christ. Sibiu: Deisis.
- Popescu, D. (1998). Christ, Church, Society. Bucharest: EIBMBOR.
- Sorescu, V. (1997). The Orthodox Religion, Guide for the Believers. Bucharest: Saeculum I.O.
- Stăniloae, D. (1995). God’s Immortal Image. vol. I. Bucharest: Cristal.
- Teşu, I. C. (2003). Richness and Poverty in the Light of Christian Spirituality. Bucharest: Credinţa Strãmoşeascã. Weber, M. (2003). The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. Bucharest: Humanitas.
- Zizioulas, J. (1967). La vision echaristique du monde et l’homme contemporain. Contacts, XIX(57), 83.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
About this article
04 October 2016
Print ISBN (optional)
Communication, communication studies, social interaction, moral purpose of education, social purpose of education
Cite this article as:
Ghibanu, I. (2016). Social Justice from the Perspective of the Contemporary Orthodox Christianism. In A. Sandu, T. Ciulei, & A. Frunza (Eds.), Logos Universality Mentality Education Novelty, vol 15. European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences (pp. 389-396). Future Academy. https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2016.09.50