Entrepreneurship development calls for support from various quarters and primarily the need exists to initiate a youth entrepreneurship culture and drive amongst the youth in the society. The Malaysian government launched several programs and schemes to boost SMEs activities. This study aims to study the determinants of youth entrepreneur’s business performance involved in micro SMEs in Malaysia. Specifically, the study analyses the relationship of infrastructure facility, business support facility and government policy with the performance of youth entrepreneurs. The study adopts a quantitative approach whereby a questionnaire survey was used to gather data. The questionnaires were distributed to sample selected using data by the Department of Statistics, Malaysia. Seemingly unrelated regression (SURE) was chosen as a method to allow for contemporaneous correlation among errors in these regression models. The results of this study is expected to give insight into the developing youth entrepreneur, thus, assisting the government in formulation policies for the development of youth entrepreneur specifically involved in micro SMEs.
Keywords: Youth Entrepreneurmicro SMEsinfrastructure facilitybusiness support facilitygovernment policy
Youth Entrepreneur and Micro SMEs
Youth entrepreneurship figures prominently in the development agendas of many developing countries including Malaysia. Youth constitute a resource of great potential and can contribute significantly to the development of the country. The ability to harness their potential will helps to determine Malaysia strength and resilience in pursuing social, economic and political development. Recently the government also encourages youth moving towards self-employment as part of the measure taken to overcome the issues of unemployment. Current uncertainties in global market demand and economic crisis situations have led to the need for any society or its communities at large to find opportunities in self-employment, including by the youths (Chigunta, 2001, Schoof, 2006). In Malaysia, the age for youth is defined as those between 15 and 40 years old but the main focus of development programs in the country are for those aged of 18 to 25. According to Institute of Youth Research Malaysia (IYRS), in 2014 youth population in Malaysia for aged between 15 to 30 years are 9.1 million which represent 30 per cent of the population. There is a significant demand of becoming entrepreneurs among youth. A study by The Institute of Youth Development Research Malaysia (IPPBM) on youth index scores of 4673 of Malaysia youth, the youths are found to have a relatively high score of 68.6 in 2011 which have increased significantly from the score of 51.6 in 2006 and 63.3 in 2008. Youth were currently resource of tremendous potential which can be expanded through developing youth entrepreneurs. Definition of Youth Entrepreneurship demonstrates their capability where the practical application of enterprising qualities such as initiative, innovation, creativity, and risk-taking into the work environment (either self-employment or employment in small start-up firms), using the appropriate skills necessary for success in that environment and culture. These qualities are crucial for competitiveness because new entrepreneurial initiatives raise the productivity level, increase competitive pressure, and encourage innovation. Malaysia has been able to nurture youth entrepreneurship through the Small and Medium Enterprise (SMEs) programs. Small and Medium Enterprise (SMEs) in Malaysia plays an important contributor to the development in Malaysia. According to the Economic Census 2011, Profile of Small and Medium Enterprises identify 97.3% (645,136) business establishments in the country are SMEs. Whereas according to Malaysia 11th Plan, SMEs will be given special focus as they made up 98.5% of total establishments and 59% of total employment in the economy in 2015. Malaysia has increased the participation of providing programs and fund towards developing the SMEs. During the Tenth Plan, regional economic corridors have provided several initiatives to uplift the lives of communities in surrounding areas. A number of initiatives were implemented across the regional economic corridors to enable local communities to benefit from the development taking place in the region
Over the years, Malaysia government has attributes to a number of supports programs to the SMEs sector. These includes the involvement of several government agencies, at both the federal and state levels, providing variety of programs to SMEs sector in achieving sustainable levels of growth and development. According to past literature there are five major areas of government’s support programs for SMEs in Malaysia, among which are: financial and credit assistance; technical and training assistance; extension and advisory services; marketing and market research; and infrastructure supports (Skuras et al., 2003). Others also mentioned the government assist SMEs through providing management expertise, land/building facilities, and information about the market and tax deduction (Oshikoya, 2007; Zellner,1962). Over RM9 billion in financial assistance was provided to more than 414,000 Bumiputera businesses. Programs such Amanah Ikhtiar Malaysia (AIM), TEKUN National, Malaysia Technology Development Corporation (MTDC), Malaysia Venture Capital Management Berhad, Malaysia Debt Ventures Berhad, and Multimedia Development Corporation (MDeC) are among the provider of financial assistance to Bumiputera SMEs in the development and their growth stage. Along the support and encouragement by the government and non-government organizational, youth entrepreneur also face a lot of other challenges that substantially hinder their progress, growth and subsequently their contribution to economic development.
On the whole, the past literatures have discussed similar problems facing SMEs, namely financing, human resources, information technology, managerial inefficiency, bureaucracy, market accessibility and competition. Similar problems and challenges also been identified in other countries such as India and Africa. The Trade India Newsletter (2007) reported among the challenges that SMEs in India faced were technological backwardness, poor financial conditions, and low levels of R&D, poor adaptability to changing trade trends, non-availability of technically trained human resources, lack of management skills, lack of access to technological information and lack of consultancy services. Whereas in many firms in Africa operate in an information-poor environment due to lack of adequate business support services and the poor information technological infrastructures (Oshikoya, 2007). Access to information has however not been given the same attention as other constraints to growth of SMEs like access to finance, markets, technology or training.
Although most of these studies have discussed almost similar problems, they have only examined SMEs as a single unit of analysis. The study analyses the relationship of business support program, infrastructure facility and government policy with the performance of youth entrepreneurs that involved in micro SMEs within their three years of operating the business. The analysis will employs Zeller (1962) seemingly unrelated regression (SURE) model to estimate the impact focusing on their performance in sales, competition and their profit.
Data and Methodology
The analyzed micro SMEs were obtained from Malaysia Department of Statistics database that provides entrepreneur characteristics and their business profile. A random sample was distributed to 14 states as a sampling population that includes a micro-enterprise only inclusive of 830 respondents. Probability sampling is used as the sampling design involving the individual of micro enterprise.
2.1 Descriptive Analysis
The level of education was low among the respondents for the study. Their educations qualifications are only limited to secondary schools. The success of SMEs is closely connected to education level (Staw, 1999; Meng and Liang, 1996). Several other factors (information, financing and institutional support) were also identified that have preventing SMEs to work at their full potential. However a number of program and support were given by the Malaysian government agencies through the government business support services in providing guide to suit the current needs of the SMEs and business environment. Among agencies involved are Majlis Amanah Rakyat (MARA), SME Bank Sdn Bhd (SME Bank), SME Corporation Berhad (SME Corp), Credit Guarantee Corporation (CGC) and National SMEs Development Council (NSDC). The contributions of these agencies are well recognised and have great impacts on the SMEs growth. In terms of gender, 62 per cent of the respondents were male and only 37 per cent are women with 50 per cent Malays, followed by Chinese and Indian.
2.3 Estimation Methodology
As a quantitative technique Seemingly Unrelated Regression (SUR) was chosen as it “permits equation coefficients and variance to differ, and also allows for contemporaneous correlation between the errors” (Adkins and Hills, 2011). It is a very useful technique as it allows to run three regressions with different independent variables (the performance of sales grow, return of investment and competition).
2.4 Estimation Results
The Breusch–Pagan tests of serial independence between the residuals for each SURE regression are reported at the bottom of Table
The results in Table 4 shows that infrastructure facility, business support facility and government policy has a significant and positive affect on the performance of micro SMEs. Basic utility infrastructure such as electricity, water, communication and information technology (IT) is importance in assuring the success of SMEs. The usage of infrastructure facility such as IT in SMEs is crucial as this became part of their marketing strategy in promoting services and products. SMEs that take this advantage in IT have made their business more mobile and transferable which allow for promoting technology, source and knowledge transfer.
Over the years, the government business support program have worked closely along the government policies and experienced a number of transformations to suit the current needs of the SMEs and business environment. This finding were supported by numbers of previous study that significantly showed the essentials and success of government support to SMEs (Saleh and Ndubisi, 2006; Jianzhong and Hong, 2009; Foziah, 2006; Schaper and Volery, 2004) Therefore, the contribution of the present study not only provides the insight into the performance of micro SMEs, but also divulges on how the government support program is perceived by micro SMEs and affect the performance.
Malaysian SMEs also face many other challenges that have been highlighted by many previous literatures. The performance of micro SMEs is positive and significantly affect by the government policy which include dissemination of information about the market, rules and regulations information and taxation information. However the results unable to identify key challenges that occur since the study do not categorized the challenges individually.
Micro SMEs has grown and play a vital role in Malaysia economic development. Concentration and attention of research on micro SMEs should be intensified as there is lack of literature in Malaysia that concentrated on the study of micro SMEs. The finding clearly supported the argument that the performance of micro SMEs in Malaysia is very much affected by the condition of infrastructure facility (i.e. basic utility infrastructure such as electricity, water and information technology facility), business support facility (i.e. entrepreneurship program by government agencies, management expertise) and government policy (i.e. information about the market, rules and regulations information and tax information). Further research may look on the individual factor of each in order to enhance the existing program and supported program by the government. More intense dissemination of information and collaboration opportunity should also be supported by state government.
The author likes to thank Niche Research Grant Scheme (NRGS) for providing funding to do the study on Talent Development and Youth Entrepreneurship.
- Abdullah, M.A.(1999). The accessibility of the government-sponsored support programmes for small and medium-
- sized enterprises in Penang. International Journal of Urban Policy and Planning(Cities), 16(2), 83-92.
- Adkins, L. C. and Hill, R. C. (2011). Using Stata for Principles of Econometrics, 4th Edition. New Jersey, United States: Wiley.
- Chigunta, F. (2001) Youth Livelihoods and Enterprise Activities in Zambia. Report to IDRC, Canada
- Foziah, I.and Aziz, L. (2006). Entrepreneurs’ awareness of bank borrowing offered by government Agencies and commercial bank in Malaysia. In Abdul Aziz Ab. Latif (Eds), Contemporary Readings on Entrepreneurship And Small Business Management (72 - 87). Malaysia : Universiti Malaysia Kelantan.
- Hashim, M.K., Mahajar, A.J. and Ahmad, S.(2003).Innovative practices of Malaysian firms: Some evidence from
- Enterprise 50 winners. Malaysian Management Review, 38(2), 19-27.
- Jianzhong, X. and Hong, F. (2009).An Empirical Study of Usage of External Business Services by Chinese SMEs.
- Journal of Enterprise Information, 22(4), 423-440.
- Meng, L. A. and Liang, T. W. (1996). Entrepreneurs, Entrepreneurship and Enterprising Culture. Paris : Addison-
- Oshikoya T, and Hussain N.(2007). Information technology and the challenge of economic development in Africa.
- Development Information Service Division (DISD): University of Copenhagen, Denmark and International
- Books, Addis Ababa
- Skuras, D., Caldas, J.C., Meccheri, N., Psaltopoulos, P., and Viladomiu, L. (2003). Institutional support to strategic
- business orientations: an empirical analysis of rural business in four countries of southern Europe. European Business Review. 15(4), 235-244.
- Saleh, A.S. and Ndubisi, N.O. (2006). SME development in Malaysia: domestic and global challenges. University of Wollongong Economics Working Paper Series, WP 06-03.
- Schoof, U. (2006). Stimulating youth entrepreneurship: Barries and incentives start-ups by young people. SEEDWorking Paper, No. 76.
- Staw, M.(1991). Psychological dimensions of organization behavior. Sydney: McMillan.
- Schaper, M. and T. Volery. (2004). Entrepreneurship and small business: A Pacific Rim perspective. Milton, Queensland: John Wiley and Sons Australia Ltd.
- SMIDEC 2002. SMI Development Plan (2001–2005). Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Percetakan Nasional Malaysia Berhad.
- Zellner A. (1962). An efficient method of estimating seemingly unrelated regression equations and tests of aggregation bias. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 57 (9), 500-509.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
About this article
22 August 2016
Print ISBN (optional)
Sociology, work, labour, organizational theory, organizational behaviour, social impact, environmental issues
Cite this article as:
Khan, S. J. M., Noor, N. S. M., & Anuar, A. R. (2016). Performance among Youth Entrepreneur in Malaysia Micro SMEs. In & B. Mohamad (Ed.), Challenge of Ensuring Research Rigor in Soft Sciences, vol 14. European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences (pp. 621-627). Future Academy. https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2016.08.88