Analysis of Nonverbal Communication Ability in Relation to Cohesion of the Representative Women’s Basketball Team – U16
Table 1: Table 1.
| Item |
Surname and name |
Score obtained |
Nonverbal |
Nb. of |
Seniority |
| no. |
T (F/C) |
competence |
selections |
| 1. |
P.I. |
33 (15/18) |
High |
2 |
6 |
| 2. |
V.F.C. |
30 (13/17) |
High |
2 |
5 |
| 3. |
S.A. |
29 (15/14) |
High |
2 |
3 |
| 4. |
R.A. |
27 (13/14) |
High |
1 |
5 |
| 5. |
O.A. |
28 (13/15) |
High |
2 |
5 |
| 6. |
N.A.R. |
32 (15/17) |
High |
5 |
6 |
| 7. |
M.R.M. |
33 (15/18) |
High |
1 |
3 |
| 8. |
A.A. |
33 (15/18) |
High |
3 |
3 |
| 9. |
M.D. |
30 (14/16) |
High |
4 |
6 |
| 10. |
P.B.T. |
30 (15/15) |
High |
2 |
5 |
| 11. |
F.A. |
31 (16/15) |
High |
5 |
7 |
| 12. |
D.V. |
30 (13/17) |
High |
2 |
6 |
| 13. |
G.A. |
31 (14/17) |
High |
5 |
8 |
| 14. |
M.M. |
33 (17/16) |
High |
2 |
6 |
| 15. |
C.M. |
29 (12/17) |
High |
5 |
5 |
| 16. |
N.A. |
27 (12/15) |
High |
5 |
6 |
| 17. |
K.A. |
28 (13/15) |
High |
5 |
5 |
| 18. |
C.A. |
31 (14/17) |
High |
4 |
4 |
| 19. |
P.M.L. |
30 (16/14) |
High |
3 |
8 |
| 20. |
P.A. |
31 (16/15) |
High |
3 |
8 |
< Back to article
