European Proceedings Logo

Czech University Language Teachers’ Perspectives on the 2020 Pandemic

Table 4: Results of statistical testing for section B: Lesson

Section B: Lesson By university By teaching experience By sex
Item Kruskal-WallisANOVA p value Kruskal-WallisANOVA p value Mann-Whitney U testp value
B1: Online classes are more teacher centered than F2F classes. 0.05 0.32 0.60
B2: F2F classes are based on student interaction more than online classes. 0.26 0.76 0.38
B3: I find it harder to provoke a class discussion in online lessons. 0.22 0.74 0.86
B4: I must call students out to get a reaction. 0.88 0.51 0.56
B5: I use break-out rooms. 0.77 0.22 0.01
B6: I find it harder to improvise in online lessons. 0.63 0.52 0.13
B7: I miss the spontaneity of F2F lessons. 0.57 0.15 0.78
B8: I miss the whiteboard. 0.62 0.04 0.11
B9: I miss eye contact. 0.52 0.57 0.47
B10: I perform random checks to see if students are present. 0.26 0.09 0.54
B11: I believe students pay more attention in F2F lessons. 0.65 0.89 0.68
B12: Preparing for online lessons is more time consuming. 0.65 0.20 0.26
B13: I appreciate the opportunity to teach from anywhere. 0.39 0.35 0.49
B14: I appreciate the opportunity to share the lesson with anyone. 0.08 0.74 0.40
B15: I find online lessons static (I sit all the time without moving around). 0.71 0.65 0.71
B16: Teaching online saves time. 0.49 0.21 0.75
B17: I believe that students are happy with online learning. 0.72 0.85 0.35
B18: Overally, I am happy with online teaching. 0.64 0.41 0.59
< Back to article