Enhancing Reading Comprehension via Metacognitive Strategy Instruction in a Chinese EFL Classroom
Table 6: Descriptive Statistics of Pre-Posttest Scores for MetaSI and Control Group
| Treatment |
Pretest Scores |
Post Scores |
|
Mean |
N(%) |
SD |
Mean |
N(%) |
SD |
| MetaSI(EG) |
High |
81.50 |
3(10%) |
0.71 |
84.78 |
12(40%) |
2.59 |
| Medium |
68.25 |
19(63%) |
4.35 |
72.89 |
15(50%) |
4.83 |
| Low |
54.00 |
8(27%) |
4.90 |
58 |
3(10%) |
1.00 |
| Total |
65.33 |
30 |
8.81 |
74.97 |
30 |
8.83 |
| TI(CG) |
High |
81.00 |
2(6%) |
0 |
82.00 |
4(13%) |
1.41 |
| Medium |
67.39 |
23(77%) |
4.57 |
67.01 |
23(77%) |
5.79 |
| Low |
55.80 |
5(17%) |
3.11 |
57.80 |
3(10%) |
2.59 |
| Total |
66.37 |
30 |
7.21 |
67.17 |
30 |
7.56 |
< Back to article
