ECONOMIC SECURITY VIOLATION IN THE FINANCIAL MARKET OF RUSSIA AND CRIMINAL LAW

In the Russian Federation, financial security is a new economic and legal category. Financial security is one of the elements of economic security and effective national security is directly related to the financial system. Crimes in the financial market decrease the level of economic growth of the country, being barriers to trade and increasing the burden on the national budget; difficulties arise for foreign economic activities. It seems relevant to develop criminal law countermeasures aimed at improving the national economic security. The article describes an algorithm for the qualification of unlawful acts, which can contribute to the effective investigation of the financial crimes. The article also examines signs of crimes committed in the financial markets. The results obtained indicate the importance of reforms to improve the criminal legislation, update the conceptual apparatus and laws on the digital space in the financial market, including cryptocurrencies and electronic money. The examples of financial crimes, which are more characterized by deliberate falsity of information provided are provided.


Introduction
A description of crimes in the financial markets of the Russian Federation will be incomplete without studying the limits and possibilities of criminal law measures and analyzing criminal law characteristics of these crimes. A detailed analysis of each corpus delicti is beyond the scope of this article. It would be more correct to characterize financial crimes as a specific isolated group of criminal encroachments, highlighting the inherent features of certain elements of the corpus delicti (Frunza, 2015).
Financial security is one of the elements of economic security and effective national security is directly related to the financial system (budgets and other institutions), the ability of this system to provide the government with financial resources to perform internal and external functions. Financial security is conditions for the development of the object of relations, as well as the process of creating and maintaining this object; the ability of the financial sector to meet relevant needs, continuously developing and operating with minimal violations (Gallagher et al., 2014).
All of the above indicates the need to analyze various measures to combat crimes in the markets and the need to study and generalize research results of other scientists to make decisions on existing problems.

Problem Statement
Traditionally, in the doctrine of criminal law, the corpus delicti is defined as a set of elements that characterize the objective and subjective signs of a crime. These elements include the object, the objective side, the subject, and the subjective side (Sarco, 2016).
Generic and specific objects are reflected in the titles of sections and chapters of the Special Part of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. As for the financial crimes, the generic object is economic relations (Section VIII), the specific object is property relations (Chapter 21) and legal economic relations (Chapter 22).
The difficulties are associated with the definition of the direct object of the crimes under consideration, listed in Chapter 22. Despite the fact that they are located in one chapter, these crimes are diverse, which is due to the diversity of economic relations. Financial crimes are united by a variety of public relations, which is a set of services provided by financial institutions, including insurance services, services provided in the securities market, investment, leasing. This area outlines the range of subjects, which are represented by certain assets, including financial instruments.
Financial activities are an integral part of the economic life, due to the presence of commoditymoney relations, aimed at the creation, distribution, redistribution and use of funds (Velichko et al., 2015). From a substantive point of view, a financial activity is a movement of both equity and debt capital (Karabanova, 2018).
The crimes affect various activities in the financial markets. Some of them are related to property relations (Articles 159, 1591, 1595, 160 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation establish liability for fraud, including in the field of lending and insurance, as well as for misappropriation or embezzlement); violations of the established procedure for conducting certain activities (Articles 1701, https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2021.11.210 Corresponding Author: Valery Filippovich Tsepelev Selection andpeer-review under  Cryptocurrency as an object of financial crimes can be characterized as a digital asset, a kind of digital currency created and controlled by the cryptographic protection methods (Sidorenko, 2018).
Scientists have discussed the issue of criminal prosecution for crimes involving cryptocurrencies and other virtual assets (Babina & Tarasenko, 2018). Until now, there is no legal regulation of the turnover of cryptocurrencies.
This or that asset may be the direct subject of a crime if it is classified as an object of civil rights mentioned in Article 128 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. Cryptocurrencies are not referred to these objects, which does not prevent some specialists from referring it to things, property rights or other property objects (Sidorenko, 2018).  (Dodd, 2005).
The above formulation of the subject of crime is quite reasonable, since the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation proceeded from the existing legal regulation, the provisions of https: //doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2021.11.210 Corresponding Author: Valery Filippovich Tsepelev Selection and peer-review under  The second subject of these crimes is information. In the dispositions of a number of articles on financial crimes (Articles 1591(Articles , 1701(Articles , 1721(Articles , 185-1853(Articles , 1856 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation), the terms "data" and "information" are used along with the term "information". Being synonymous, they can create difficulties in law enforcement activities.
The criminal law doctrine distinguishes between mandatory and optional signs of information.
Among the mandatory signs are truthfulness of information and ability to be an object of regulatory legal relations in economic activities. The form and value of information that are important for a number of economic crimes are optional signs (Zhilkin, 2019). From the point of view of subjective signs, these crimes are committed by professional participants in economic activities, which is due to the specifics of the financial markets (borrowers, https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2021.11.210 Corresponding Author: Valery Filippovich Tsepelev Selection and peer-review under

Research Questions
The subject of the article is the theoretical, legal, organizational support of criminal law opposition in the financial markets.
The theoretical and legal support involves the analysis of rules on the financial crimes, including the use of the Internet and cryptocurrencies.

Purpose of the Study
The purpose is to describe legal relations in the financial market and effective criminal law protection measures.

Research Methods
The main research methods are as follows: the method of analysis of legal acts, the method of content analysis used for comparing concepts from different branches of law, and the expert assessment method.

Findings
The results obtained indicate the importance of reforms to improve the criminal legislation, update the conceptual apparatus and laws on the digital space in the financial market, including cryptocurrencies and electronic money.

Conclusion
The criminal-law characteristics of crimes committed in the financial markets indicate the complex structure of these violations, help to understand their nature and contribute to the improvement of law enforcement, especially in terms of qualifying crimes.